Para_Frog 1 #1 December 6, 2007 Let's revisit the hypocracy thread about conservatives. Scumbag BTW - He blames the right wing conspiracy. SFGate He had images as part of, uh, research - ala Pete Townshend. I guess since he's a liberal, and not preaching family values, there is no outrage. Right?- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #2 December 6, 2007 >I guess since he's a liberal, and not preaching family values, there is no outrage. If the charges are valid he's still a scumbag. He's just not a hypocrite, unless he's been going on about family values. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #3 December 7, 2007 Quote I guess since he's a liberal, and not preaching family values, there is no outrage. Right? If you don't think that there's anything wrong with it, then it's ok, so I've been told. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,595 #4 December 7, 2007 QuoteI guess since he's a liberal, and not preaching family values, there is no outrage. Right? If (like in the recent conservative threads) he'd been caught having gay sex then there would probably be no outrage, since he, unlike the conservatives, wouldn't be a hypocrite by being gay. However, there is a massive difference between being gay and being a consumer of child porn. That's just sick all on its own. So to be quite honest, the whole premise of your thread is complete bollocks.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #5 December 7, 2007 Let see, he is a , well, this is what the articel says. "On KGO, however, his liberal rantings have found a substantial following in the nation's most left- leaning region, making him one of the few "progressive" talkers to succeed on a long term basis. In fact, some observers wondered why Ward was not a part of Air America's initial lineup. ===================================== ....a "progresive" so we know he is NOT a "right wing nut". Although "liberal loon" might be a phrase used if the media there was say, well, conservative? and, the Bush admin is going after him because he is vocal against Bush??? Dont believe me ? Listen to the link provided Look, I could care less what his views are. If he was anti gay or not. Does not matter at all. I am a little amazed the way this thread defened him (you know, because he is not a hypocrit the crime is not near as serious) but, not really surprised. (again assuming the charges are upheld) As billvon said, if the charges hold he is scum just like anybody would be. The message they give or the stance they take makes the crime no less or no more important. I only post this to may see the how differently media views thier own vs conservatives Quite striking really. Edited to add. Why was the gay issue brought up to begin with??? His crime is child porn, correct? So the gay thing and right wing hypocrit shot came out because...?????? Oh ya, he is not liberal "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lefty 0 #6 December 7, 2007 Quote"On KGO, however, his liberal rantings have found a substantial following in the nation's most left- leaning region, making him one of the few "progressive" talkers to succeed on a long term basis. In fact, some observers wondered why Ward was not a part of Air America's initial lineup. I always thought the term "progressive" was complete BS anyway. What exactly are they progressing towards?Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful. -Calvin Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azdiver 0 #7 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuote"On KGO, however, his liberal rantings have found a substantial following in the nation's most left- leaning region, making him one of the few "progressive" talkers to succeed on a long term basis. In fact, some observers wondered why Ward was not a part of Air America's initial lineup. I always thought the term "progressive" was complete BS anyway. What exactly are they progressing towards?Insanitylight travels faster than sound, that's why some people appear to be bright until you hear them speak Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #8 December 7, 2007 "Bernie Ward, a popular liberal San Francisco radio talk show host and former Catholic priest, has been indicted on federal child pornography charges, authorities said today." Well, another one for the RC hall of shame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #9 December 7, 2007 Quote"Bernie Ward, a popular liberal San Francisco radio talk show host and former Catholic priest, has been indicted on federal child pornography charges, authorities said today." Well, another one for the RC hall of shame. Your point?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #10 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuote"Bernie Ward, a popular liberal San Francisco radio talk show host and former Catholic priest, has been indicted on federal child pornography charges, authorities said today." Well, another one for the RC hall of shame. Your point? You slept through all the Catholic priest child molestation cases?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #11 December 7, 2007 Quote"Bernie Ward, a popular liberal San Francisco radio talk show host and former Catholic priest, has been indicted on federal child pornography charges, authorities said today." Well, another one for the RC hall of shame. Fixed that for ya. Does your hatred ever end? This loon belongs to the liberals, not the Catholic Church. Own up. _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #12 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuote"Bernie Ward, a popular liberal San Francisco radio talk show host and former Catholic priest, has been indicted on federal child pornography charges, authorities said today." Well, another one for the RC hall of shame. Fixed that for ya. Does your hatred ever end? This loon belongs to the liberals, not the Catholic Church. Own up. Funny how quick it went to the conservative hypocrite comment but, what I seem to remember is the R's eating thier own in situations like this while the D's re-elect them"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #13 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuote"Bernie Ward, a popular liberal San Francisco radio talk show host and former Catholic priest, has been indicted on federal child pornography charges, authorities said today." Well, another one for the RC hall of shame. Fixed that for ya. Does your hatred ever end? This loon belongs to the liberals, not the Catholic Church. Own up. The pattern with kiddies seems to be with RC priests, but live in denial if you wish. Here's an idea - you tell us how many liberal talk show hosts have been convicted on kiddie-sex charges, and I'll report on how many RC priests have gone the same route.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #14 December 7, 2007 Wow, that's a real sharp comeback. I don't deny the Catholic Priest molestation scandal. If you're an honest person, you would compare the percentage of pedophile priests to the percentage of pedophiles as a whole. This man is not a Catholic Priest. He jumped ship and joined your team and you know it. _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #15 December 7, 2007 >What exactly are they progressing towards? Energy independence. Reduction of pollution. Equality for all regardless of their gender, race or sexual orientation. Stuff like that. Conservatives (by the dictionary definition) prefer more traditional values, which is to say not as much change and more reliance on the way things worked in the past. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diablopilot 2 #16 December 7, 2007 Sorry dude, I gotta go with Kallend on this one.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrophyHusband 0 #17 December 7, 2007 Quote>What exactly are they progressing towards? Energy independence. Reduction of pollution. Equality for all regardless of their gender, race or sexual orientation. Stuff like that. Conservatives (by the dictionary definition) prefer more traditional values, which is to say not as much change and more reliance on the way things worked in the past. maybe those are the things that you personally want, and there's nothing wrong with that, but from what i can tell they want socialism, nanny states and redistrbution of wealth. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KidWicked 0 #18 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad?Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #19 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? If you approve of the nanny state, probably not..."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #20 December 7, 2007 Its like this.. if he is guilty.. and found so in a Court of Law...... off to Federal Pound Him in the Ass prison... no hypocrisy at all..no matter what you want to believe . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ExAFO 0 #21 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TrophyHusband 0 #22 December 7, 2007 you're not serious are you? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #23 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do?Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites airtwardo 7 #24 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #25 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. So, you equate liberalism with moral action. Somehow, I don't think that was your intended result.Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
rushmc 23 #19 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? If you approve of the nanny state, probably not..."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #20 December 7, 2007 Its like this.. if he is guilty.. and found so in a Court of Law...... off to Federal Pound Him in the Ass prison... no hypocrisy at all..no matter what you want to believe . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ExAFO 0 #21 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TrophyHusband 0 #22 December 7, 2007 you're not serious are you? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #23 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do?Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites airtwardo 7 #24 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #25 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. So, you equate liberalism with moral action. Somehow, I don't think that was your intended result.Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Amazon 7 #20 December 7, 2007 Its like this.. if he is guilty.. and found so in a Court of Law...... off to Federal Pound Him in the Ass prison... no hypocrisy at all..no matter what you want to believe . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #21 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TrophyHusband 0 #22 December 7, 2007 you're not serious are you? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #23 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do?Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites airtwardo 7 #24 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #25 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. So, you equate liberalism with moral action. Somehow, I don't think that was your intended result.Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
TrophyHusband 0 #22 December 7, 2007 you're not serious are you? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KidWicked 0 #23 December 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteredistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do?Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites airtwardo 7 #24 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #25 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. So, you equate liberalism with moral action. Somehow, I don't think that was your intended result.Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
airtwardo 7 #24 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KidWicked 0 #25 December 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote redistrbution of wealth. Why is that bad? What's mine is mine. Not yours. But when the majority of wealth is held by a disproportionately small number of people, and that causes considerable suffering to the majority, why not redistribute wealth to some degree? Wouldn't that be the moral thing to do? no....that would be the liberal thing to do. So, you equate liberalism with moral action. Somehow, I don't think that was your intended result.Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
