Amazon 7 #51 December 4, 2007 Quote I made nothing up pin head Note to self........a safe term to use for people who do not agree with you and not get banned Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #52 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote I made nothing up pin head Note to self........a safe term to use for people who do not agree with you and not get banned Only after you have been called a liar by a liar"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #53 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote I made nothing up pin head Note to self........a safe term to use for people who do not agree with you and not get banned Only after you have been called a liar by a liar You have yet to prove him wrong.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #54 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote I made nothing up pin head Note to self........a safe term to use for people who do not agree with you and not get banned Only after you have been called a liar by a liar You have yet to prove him wrong. I provided the site sir."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #55 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote I made nothing up pin head Note to self........a safe term to use for people who do not agree with you and not get banned Only after you have been called a liar by a liar You have yet to prove him wrong. I provided the site sir. You provided several sites. Trouble is, none of the sites you provided actually rebutted his call. Just like the site you provided me earlier didn't in any way support your claim about 96,000 excess highway deaths.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #56 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote I made nothing up pin head Note to self........a safe term to use for people who do not agree with you and not get banned Only after you have been called a liar by a liar You have yet to prove him wrong. I provided the site sir. You provided several sites. Trouble is, none of the sites you provided actually rebutted his call. Just like the site you provided me earlier didn't in any way support your claim about 96,000 excess highway deaths. You usually miss what you want to"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #57 December 4, 2007 >I made nothing up pin head >Grow up Your one warning. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedy 0 #58 December 4, 2007 QuoteDiet (among other things) affects HDL/LDL ratios, and foods that contain a lot of trans fatty acids (for example) increase your LDL level. There has been numerous studies that show diet has very little influence on chlosterol levels, also the ratio of HDL/LDL. I suppose I will have to dig deeper in order to find out that McDonalds finance all the studies I have read about. Dave Fallschirmsport Marl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #59 December 4, 2007 QuoteNo, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quoteso, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read them.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #60 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteNo, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quoteso, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read themQuote You also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,150 #61 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quoteso, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read themQuote You also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it Since you provided no evidence at all that anyone else made it up, any reasonable person would conclude that you made it up. Easy, really. Just because you've been caught is no reason to become obnoxious.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #62 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote No, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quote so, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read them Quote You also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it Since you provided no evidence at all that anyone else made it up, any reasonable person would conclude that you made it up. Easy, really. Just because you've been caught is no reason to become obnoxious. Oh ya, now you are back to your typical moves, moving the target or changing the context. Glad to see you are back. I thought maybe you were sick or worse"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #63 December 4, 2007 QuoteYou also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it I don't give a flying fuck about whether your response is civil. I just want you to source your statement, because I think you made it up. Now, you say that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community but have provided absolutely zero evidence to show that he is now or has ever been "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I say you just made it up. Want to prove me wrong? SOURCE IT. Show me who in the GW community ever "reviled Hansen as a nut case". If you say he really is "reviled as a nut case" then it should be easy - if you just made it up, well, then I can see why you would be stalling so much.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #64 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, I did not make it up. did you? So who reviles him as a nutjob? As I showed, he still very much believes in man-made global warming. I guess he flops more than Kerry and Clinton then As an extra present for you rush, here's the Hansen article that your original Heartland quote was talking about. If you take the time to read it, you will see absolutely nothing in it that suggests Hansen ever stopped believing in man made GW. In fact the entire article is about methods of reducing man made GW. Tell me, why would the GW community "revile as a nutjob" a man who has consistently been at the forefront of the GW movement for the last 25 years?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #65 December 4, 2007 I am still looking for the info. I may have the specific person incorrect but again I am still looking. Regardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. In the mean time. See how some of those mentioned here are being treated today. (I make no claim as I have not gotten that far yet) http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=9469"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #66 December 4, 2007 QuoteRegardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. Another lie. Here's my original claim, post #31 of this thread. QuoteQuoteThis once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! As you can see, the thing that I am claiming you have made up is that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I repeat this very same claim in post's #33, #36, #42, #49, #59, #63, #64 and now this one. It is a flat out lie that I have changed my claim at any point in this thread. You were the one who tried to change what you said - claiming you said that he "was (at the time)" when it is written in black and white for all to see that you actually said "is now". But that's irrelevant, since you still haven't shown that he has ever been reviled.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #67 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Regardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. Another lie. Here's my original claim, post #31 of this thread. Quote Quote This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! As you can see, the thing that I am claiming you have made up is that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I repeat this very same claim in post's #33, #36, #42, #49, #59, #63, #64 and now this one. It is a flat out lie that I have changed my claim at any point in this thread. You were the one who tried to change what you said - claiming you said that he "was (at the time)" when it is written in black and white for all to see that you actually said "is now". But that's irrelevant, since you still haven't shown that he has ever been reviled. And now you ignore post #65. Nice Fact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. I understand"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #68 December 4, 2007 QuoteFact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. Are you for fucking real? Are you honestly trying to be taken seriously? Post #31 is my very first post on this thread - lets see what it says shall we? QuoteQuoteThis once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! Read it. Comprehend it. Fucking understand it! I was then, and have forever since been claiming that the thing you made up is the thing that I fucking quoted, namely (how many fucking times do I have to repeat this?) that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the fucking GW community! How god-damned difficult is that to understand! That is what I claimed that you made up. That is what I've been claiming you made up. That is always what I have claimed you made up. You have not posted any quotes or links that show you did not make it up. You have not proved that you did not make it up. Any attempt by you to claim that you have proved you have not made it up is a lie. Any attempt by you to claim that I have in any way changed my claim of what you made up is a lie. Are we fucking clear?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #69 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Fact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. Are you for fucking real? Are you honestly trying to be taken seriously? Post #31 is my very first post on this thread - lets see what it says shall we? Quote Quote This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! Read it. Comprehend it. Fucking understand it! I was then, and have forever since been claiming that the thing you made up is the thing that I fucking quoted, namely (how many fucking times do I have to repeat this?) that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the fucking GW community! How god-damned difficult is that to understand! That is what I claimed that you made up. That is what I've been claiming you made up. That is always what I have claimed you made up. You have not posted any quotes or links that show you did not make it up. You have not proved that you did not make it up. Any attempt by you to claim that you have proved you have not made it up is a lie. Any attempt by you to claim that I have in any way changed my claim of what you made up is a lie. Are we fucking clear? Oh ya I dont believe you but it clear"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #70 December 4, 2007 Quote Oh ya I dont believe you but it clear Jesus fucking Christ man! If I had wanted to say that you had made up the entire post then why would I have quoted only one specific line of it, and then in all of my following posts repeat that one specific line and that line only requesting that you prove you did not make it up. Seriously, If I'd meant to say that you'd made up your entire post then why wouldn't I have just clicked "quote" instead of taking the trouble to cut and paste that one single specific line of your post and put the reply tags around it? Don't you think that it's a massive fucking co-incidence that I cut and pasted only that one specific line of your post into my reply if you claim that I only later changed my goal posts to saying that you made up that one specific line? Fucking hellSometimes I honestly wonder if you speak english. Like, at all.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 3 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kallend 2,150 #61 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quoteso, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read themQuote You also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it Since you provided no evidence at all that anyone else made it up, any reasonable person would conclude that you made it up. Easy, really. Just because you've been caught is no reason to become obnoxious.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #62 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote No, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quote so, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read them Quote You also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it Since you provided no evidence at all that anyone else made it up, any reasonable person would conclude that you made it up. Easy, really. Just because you've been caught is no reason to become obnoxious. Oh ya, now you are back to your typical moves, moving the target or changing the context. Glad to see you are back. I thought maybe you were sick or worse"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #63 December 4, 2007 QuoteYou also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it I don't give a flying fuck about whether your response is civil. I just want you to source your statement, because I think you made it up. Now, you say that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community but have provided absolutely zero evidence to show that he is now or has ever been "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I say you just made it up. Want to prove me wrong? SOURCE IT. Show me who in the GW community ever "reviled Hansen as a nut case". If you say he really is "reviled as a nut case" then it should be easy - if you just made it up, well, then I can see why you would be stalling so much.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #64 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, I did not make it up. did you? So who reviles him as a nutjob? As I showed, he still very much believes in man-made global warming. I guess he flops more than Kerry and Clinton then As an extra present for you rush, here's the Hansen article that your original Heartland quote was talking about. If you take the time to read it, you will see absolutely nothing in it that suggests Hansen ever stopped believing in man made GW. In fact the entire article is about methods of reducing man made GW. Tell me, why would the GW community "revile as a nutjob" a man who has consistently been at the forefront of the GW movement for the last 25 years?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #65 December 4, 2007 I am still looking for the info. I may have the specific person incorrect but again I am still looking. Regardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. In the mean time. See how some of those mentioned here are being treated today. (I make no claim as I have not gotten that far yet) http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=9469"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #66 December 4, 2007 QuoteRegardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. Another lie. Here's my original claim, post #31 of this thread. QuoteQuoteThis once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! As you can see, the thing that I am claiming you have made up is that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I repeat this very same claim in post's #33, #36, #42, #49, #59, #63, #64 and now this one. It is a flat out lie that I have changed my claim at any point in this thread. You were the one who tried to change what you said - claiming you said that he "was (at the time)" when it is written in black and white for all to see that you actually said "is now". But that's irrelevant, since you still haven't shown that he has ever been reviled.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #67 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Regardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. Another lie. Here's my original claim, post #31 of this thread. Quote Quote This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! As you can see, the thing that I am claiming you have made up is that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I repeat this very same claim in post's #33, #36, #42, #49, #59, #63, #64 and now this one. It is a flat out lie that I have changed my claim at any point in this thread. You were the one who tried to change what you said - claiming you said that he "was (at the time)" when it is written in black and white for all to see that you actually said "is now". But that's irrelevant, since you still haven't shown that he has ever been reviled. And now you ignore post #65. Nice Fact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. I understand"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #68 December 4, 2007 QuoteFact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. Are you for fucking real? Are you honestly trying to be taken seriously? Post #31 is my very first post on this thread - lets see what it says shall we? QuoteQuoteThis once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! Read it. Comprehend it. Fucking understand it! I was then, and have forever since been claiming that the thing you made up is the thing that I fucking quoted, namely (how many fucking times do I have to repeat this?) that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the fucking GW community! How god-damned difficult is that to understand! That is what I claimed that you made up. That is what I've been claiming you made up. That is always what I have claimed you made up. You have not posted any quotes or links that show you did not make it up. You have not proved that you did not make it up. Any attempt by you to claim that you have proved you have not made it up is a lie. Any attempt by you to claim that I have in any way changed my claim of what you made up is a lie. Are we fucking clear?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #69 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Fact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. Are you for fucking real? Are you honestly trying to be taken seriously? Post #31 is my very first post on this thread - lets see what it says shall we? Quote Quote This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! Read it. Comprehend it. Fucking understand it! I was then, and have forever since been claiming that the thing you made up is the thing that I fucking quoted, namely (how many fucking times do I have to repeat this?) that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the fucking GW community! How god-damned difficult is that to understand! That is what I claimed that you made up. That is what I've been claiming you made up. That is always what I have claimed you made up. You have not posted any quotes or links that show you did not make it up. You have not proved that you did not make it up. Any attempt by you to claim that you have proved you have not made it up is a lie. Any attempt by you to claim that I have in any way changed my claim of what you made up is a lie. Are we fucking clear? Oh ya I dont believe you but it clear"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,596 #70 December 4, 2007 Quote Oh ya I dont believe you but it clear Jesus fucking Christ man! If I had wanted to say that you had made up the entire post then why would I have quoted only one specific line of it, and then in all of my following posts repeat that one specific line and that line only requesting that you prove you did not make it up. Seriously, If I'd meant to say that you'd made up your entire post then why wouldn't I have just clicked "quote" instead of taking the trouble to cut and paste that one single specific line of your post and put the reply tags around it? Don't you think that it's a massive fucking co-incidence that I cut and pasted only that one specific line of your post into my reply if you claim that I only later changed my goal posts to saying that you made up that one specific line? Fucking hellSometimes I honestly wonder if you speak english. Like, at all.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 3 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
rushmc 23 #62 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote No, I said he was (at the time). Liar. "This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case." Just can't help yourself eh? Quote so, you called me a liar and I called you ass on it. You said I made shit up and I called your ass on that too. You haven't "called" me on anything, unless by "calling" you mean just saying "did not did not did not!!!" You have provided ZERO, ZIP, NADA, THE BIG GOOSE EGG evidence that anyone, anywhere, anytime in the GW community EVER reviled Hansen as a nutcase. If you think that any of your links actually provide evidence for that claim then, quite simply, you haven't bothered to read them Quote You also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it Since you provided no evidence at all that anyone else made it up, any reasonable person would conclude that you made it up. Easy, really. Just because you've been caught is no reason to become obnoxious. Oh ya, now you are back to your typical moves, moving the target or changing the context. Glad to see you are back. I thought maybe you were sick or worse"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #63 December 4, 2007 QuoteYou also said I MADE SHIT UP now didnt you! At that point you cleared yourself of getting a civil response from me. Live with it I don't give a flying fuck about whether your response is civil. I just want you to source your statement, because I think you made it up. Now, you say that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community but have provided absolutely zero evidence to show that he is now or has ever been "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I say you just made it up. Want to prove me wrong? SOURCE IT. Show me who in the GW community ever "reviled Hansen as a nut case". If you say he really is "reviled as a nut case" then it should be easy - if you just made it up, well, then I can see why you would be stalling so much.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #64 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, I did not make it up. did you? So who reviles him as a nutjob? As I showed, he still very much believes in man-made global warming. I guess he flops more than Kerry and Clinton then As an extra present for you rush, here's the Hansen article that your original Heartland quote was talking about. If you take the time to read it, you will see absolutely nothing in it that suggests Hansen ever stopped believing in man made GW. In fact the entire article is about methods of reducing man made GW. Tell me, why would the GW community "revile as a nutjob" a man who has consistently been at the forefront of the GW movement for the last 25 years?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #65 December 4, 2007 I am still looking for the info. I may have the specific person incorrect but again I am still looking. Regardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. In the mean time. See how some of those mentioned here are being treated today. (I make no claim as I have not gotten that far yet) http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=9469"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #66 December 4, 2007 QuoteRegardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. Another lie. Here's my original claim, post #31 of this thread. QuoteQuoteThis once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! As you can see, the thing that I am claiming you have made up is that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I repeat this very same claim in post's #33, #36, #42, #49, #59, #63, #64 and now this one. It is a flat out lie that I have changed my claim at any point in this thread. You were the one who tried to change what you said - claiming you said that he "was (at the time)" when it is written in black and white for all to see that you actually said "is now". But that's irrelevant, since you still haven't shown that he has ever been reviled.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #67 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Regardless, you change your claim of what "I made up" I did not but you ignore that. Another lie. Here's my original claim, post #31 of this thread. Quote Quote This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! As you can see, the thing that I am claiming you have made up is that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the GW community. I repeat this very same claim in post's #33, #36, #42, #49, #59, #63, #64 and now this one. It is a flat out lie that I have changed my claim at any point in this thread. You were the one who tried to change what you said - claiming you said that he "was (at the time)" when it is written in black and white for all to see that you actually said "is now". But that's irrelevant, since you still haven't shown that he has ever been reviled. And now you ignore post #65. Nice Fact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. I understand"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #68 December 4, 2007 QuoteFact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. Are you for fucking real? Are you honestly trying to be taken seriously? Post #31 is my very first post on this thread - lets see what it says shall we? QuoteQuoteThis once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! Read it. Comprehend it. Fucking understand it! I was then, and have forever since been claiming that the thing you made up is the thing that I fucking quoted, namely (how many fucking times do I have to repeat this?) that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the fucking GW community! How god-damned difficult is that to understand! That is what I claimed that you made up. That is what I've been claiming you made up. That is always what I have claimed you made up. You have not posted any quotes or links that show you did not make it up. You have not proved that you did not make it up. Any attempt by you to claim that you have proved you have not made it up is a lie. Any attempt by you to claim that I have in any way changed my claim of what you made up is a lie. Are we fucking clear?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #69 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Fact remains you claimed I made up the info in that one one post. I did not and I have proved it to you. so, you move the target. Are you for fucking real? Are you honestly trying to be taken seriously? Post #31 is my very first post on this thread - lets see what it says shall we? Quote Quote This once hero of you position is now reviled as some kind of nut case. Hah! Dude, you've just made that up! Read it. Comprehend it. Fucking understand it! I was then, and have forever since been claiming that the thing you made up is the thing that I fucking quoted, namely (how many fucking times do I have to repeat this?) that Hansen is "reviled as a nut case" by the fucking GW community! How god-damned difficult is that to understand! That is what I claimed that you made up. That is what I've been claiming you made up. That is always what I have claimed you made up. You have not posted any quotes or links that show you did not make it up. You have not proved that you did not make it up. Any attempt by you to claim that you have proved you have not made it up is a lie. Any attempt by you to claim that I have in any way changed my claim of what you made up is a lie. Are we fucking clear? Oh ya I dont believe you but it clear"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #70 December 4, 2007 Quote Oh ya I dont believe you but it clear Jesus fucking Christ man! If I had wanted to say that you had made up the entire post then why would I have quoted only one specific line of it, and then in all of my following posts repeat that one specific line and that line only requesting that you prove you did not make it up. Seriously, If I'd meant to say that you'd made up your entire post then why wouldn't I have just clicked "quote" instead of taking the trouble to cut and paste that one single specific line of your post and put the reply tags around it? Don't you think that it's a massive fucking co-incidence that I cut and pasted only that one specific line of your post into my reply if you claim that I only later changed my goal posts to saying that you made up that one specific line? Fucking hellSometimes I honestly wonder if you speak english. Like, at all.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
