Recommended Posts
steve1 5
I'm confused - is your primary goal the activity, or the product - ie
do you hunt because you want the meat and the rest?
or do you use the meat and the rest because you want to hunt?
I don't care much either way, but I'm in the first camp (I take pleasure in hunting, but it's not the goal) and only marginally understand the second camp other than at least they aren't wasting the meat.
Hunting is romanticized by many. I don't agree, but it doesn't bother me either.
reply)
......................................................................
I think I am confused by some of your words too. So, I'll try to explain this better if I can. I'm not trying to romanticize anything here. Every hunter I know goes afield with a set of ethics in his head. These ethics guide his actions.
Using a high powered rifle to go out and kill something involves a lot of responsibility. Hopefully someone has the right sense of values and uses the right kind of judgment while hunting, and particularly prior to pulling the trigger on something. There's plenty of hunters out there who may not have the right kind of ethics in their head. Many have earned the name, "Slob Hunter".
I respect the critters I hunt. They are more than just so many hamburgers or steaks, in my mind. They are a living creature who ranks far higher (in my mind) than a domesticated cow or chicken. I think wildlife deserves to be killed quickly and cleanly and not wasted. To do otherwise is not showing any kind of respect. I also think there needs to be some challenge involved, or why hunt? I guess we can inject all kinds of complicated thinking into this, but this pretty much sums up my thinking on this....
BTW if you are ever interested in someone who trains horses who hunt, and ground tie, as well as being absolutely sure of themselves in all terrains and conditions contact me, I will forward you the number for Tony Brewer, of Formac Stables.
Formac is the home of nearly every champion gaited horse, and Tony is the head apprentice to Mr. Connell
The hunting horses have become his side line, due to his needs for such a horse, in order to track down loose high value horses for others.
The horse he showed me was Crazy Horse, and it was an amazing animal, it went 72 hours straight on the trail, and after feed and water, was ready to go again.
It is like having the Humvee of horses.
There is a good chance something truly amazing might be taken.
steve1 5
kbordson 8
I have several friends that have done "canned" hunts. Trophies up on the walls... stories of braveness and cunning I find them distasteful and sad (and canned predator hunts even moreso). There was no "hunt." As you said, those are "livestock" and not wild. I think you can enjoy the meat, but you lose big points on bragging rights.
PLFXpert 0
JohnRich 4
QuoteFinger-printing & DNA samples should be pre-requirements for it.
For what? For going on a canned hunt? Why?
QuoteQuoteFinger-printing & DNA samples should be pre-requirements for it.
For what? For going on a canned hunt? Why?
because anyone who considers butchering a captive animal 'hunting' is a sick fuck, and quite possible sociopathic.
JohnRich 4
Quoteanyone who considers butchering a captive animal 'hunting' is a sick fuck, and quite possible sociopathic.
So people who work in slaughterhouses to stock our grocery stores with fresh meats are possibly sociopaths?
Or would it be okay as long as they didn't call it "hunting"?
QuoteQuoteanyone who considers butchering a captive animal 'hunting' is a sick fuck, and quite possible sociopathic.
So people who work in slaughterhouses to stock our grocery stores with fresh meats are possibly sociopaths?
Or would it be okay as long as they didn't call it "hunting"?
Correct. They are doing a job. It is possible that there may be one or two sickos in that industry that do it because they get off on killing, but I am sure the majority of slaughterhouse workers do not put stuffed longhorns on their den wall.
Finding your prey is an integral part of hunting. If you already have the beast in your possession it is not hunting; it is farming.
JohnRich 4
QuoteQuoteOr would it be okay as long as they didn't call it "hunting"?
Correct. They are doing a job. It is possible that there may be one or two sickos in that industry that do it because they get off on killing, but I am sure the majority of slaughterhouse workers do not put stuffed longhorns on their den wall.
Finding your prey is an integral part of hunting. If you already have the beast in your possession it is not hunting; it is farming.
So if they called it "harvesting" instead of "hunting", then you would be okay with canned hunts?
JohnRich 4
QuoteIf there is a legitimate purpose for the slaughter that's fine. Putting a trophy on your wall is not, to my way of thinking a legitimate reason; for the pure joy of killing something even less so.
That's the point I was getting to: As long as the meat is used, then you're really not opposed to the practice of canned hunts, other than the name used for the technique. So the controversy is really all about the name, rather than the actual practice.
"Alaska sure beats Montana for hunting these days. Maybe we could all meat up there."---------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOL. Pun intended?
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites