0
Lucky...

Bush uses sixth veto to reject health-labor bill

Recommended Posts

Must be the reason Ken Lay's political contributions were:
REPUBLICAN:91% DEMOCRAT:2% OTHER 7%.

In other words, you are simply wrong.



I mean come on man. Some one else uses the "who contributes to who" line and you po po it implying that means nothing. NOW, that it supports YOUR position to do so there is some meaning to it.

FLOP:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Must be the reason Ken Lay's political contributions were:
REPUBLICAN:91% DEMOCRAT:2% OTHER 7%.

In other words, you are simply wrong.



I mean come on man. Some one else uses the "who contributes to who" line and you po po it implying that means nothing. NOW, that it supports YOUR position to do so there is some meaning to it.

FLOP:D

TOO is not the same as TO or TWO. DAM is not the same as DAMN. Don't complain if people can't understand your gibberish writing.

Apparently you've forgotten! Ken Lay was the head of Enron - a BIG GOP and BUSH supporter.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flip

Nice PA's by the way

I read a couple of threads a day or two ago. Spelling was similar to mine. However, you agreed with the posts so no comment.

Nice
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Flip

Nice PA's by the way

I read a couple of threads a day or two ago. Spelling was similar to mine. However, you agreed with the posts so no comment.

Nice



Watch out for that twist in your bood you were telling us about earlier today.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Must be the reason Ken Lay's political contributions were:
REPUBLICAN:91% DEMOCRAT:2% OTHER 7%.

In other words, you are simply wrong.



I mean come on man. Some one else uses the "who contributes to who" line and you po po it implying that means nothing. NOW, that it supports YOUR position to do so there is some meaning to it.

FLOP:D


TOO is not the same as TO or TWO. DAM is not the same as DAMN. Don't complain if people can't understand your gibberish writing.

Apparently you've forgotten! Ken Lay was the head of Enron - a BIG GOP and BUSH supporter.

This is what desperation looks like, folks.
Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Flip

Nice PA's by the way

I read a couple of threads a day or two ago. Spelling was similar to mine. However, you agreed with the posts so no comment.

Nice



Watch out for that twist in your bood you were telling us about earlier today.



See, you just enjoy playing the ass. And you are DAM good at it by the way
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

the enron exec's stayed at the white house as guests of clinton's. got millions funneled to enron from the clinton administration.



www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/enron.asp

You've been fooled by the right wing propaganda machine.
And DICK c's secret energy meetings have still not come under the microscope have they? A nice little story> http://www.thenation.com/doc/20020415/nichols;)"Cheney's prognosis was flawed; within days, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission agreed to price caps and the markets calmed down. But Cheney was undeterred in his drive to deliver for Enron."
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Regardless of how you spin it price caps are just plain wrong but, kallend claimed a right wing spin was all that put Clinton with the enron thing. I think he has been proven wrong.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Regardless of how you spin it price caps are just plain wrong but, kallend claimed a right wing spin was all that put Clinton with the enron thing. I think he has been proven wrong.

Here's another nice little read for ya.;) http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cheney's_Energy_Task_ForceRead it in its entirety now.
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont have time to read it now. If Cheney did something illeagal then I would support jailing him, as I would Bush. My point remains, Clinton is not clean here as kallend asserted
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Replying multiple times to the same post shows a certain tenacity (or is it obsession?).:P

However, I guess you didn't read the Snopes debunking of the myths, or just ignored it because of your CDIF mentality.

And there is the LITTLE matter that Ken Lay, Enron's big boss, contributed over 40 times as much to GOP campaigns as to Dem. campaigns. Want to know where allegiances lie - FOLLOW THE MONEY, right from Enron to the GOP.
www.campaignmoney.com/biography/ken_lay.asp

Ditto for convicted Enron felon Jeff Skilling:
www.campaignmoney.com/biography/jeff_skilling.asp

yep, big DEM folks, those Enron folks.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Regardless of how you spin it price caps are just plain wrong but, kallend claimed a right wing spin was all that put Clinton with the enron thing. I think he has been proven wrong.

Here's another nice little read for ya.;) http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cheney's_Energy_Task_ForceRead it in its entirety now.


That reminds me, why is it that Scalia hasn't been kicked off the bench yet? I guess actual impropriety doesn't hold as much weight as the appearance of impropriety.
Also, this was always one of my favorite maps to bring out during the "it's not about oil" discussions.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/IraqOilFrgnSuitors.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Replying multiple times to the same post shows a certain tenacity (or is it obsession?).:P

However, I guess you didn't read the Snopes debunking of the myths, or just ignored it because of your CDIF mentality.

And there is the LITTLE matter that Ken Lay, Enron's big boss, contributed over 40 times as much to GOP campaigns as to Dem. campaigns. Want to know where allegiances lie - FOLLOW THE MONEY, right from Enron to the GOP.
www.campaignmoney.com/biography/ken_lay.asp

Ditto for convicted Enron felon Jeff Skilling:
www.campaignmoney.com/biography/jeff_skilling.asp

yep, big DEM folks, those Enron folks.



Obsession is the right word most likely :P and, I am not nor have I ever said that the GOP is not involved but, Your post implied this whole debaclk lay in the laps of the GOP, that, is not the case
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I dont have time to read it now. If Cheney did something illeagal then I would support jailing him, as I would Bush. My point remains, Clinton is not clean here as kallend asserted



For your next class in REALITY...( I know its gonna be tough for you)

Compare and Contrast the difference in the rise in energy prices under the Clinton Administration and what has occured under the Bush Administration



And as a bonus point comment on which president has ties to the oil business or.. PART of the oil business

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0