akarunway 1 #1 September 24, 2007 Just read this from another link I posted. Any thoughts?>http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/Reality_Check_-_FAA.pdf?docID=2581I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #2 September 24, 2007 While I agree that private jets need to share the burden, I think it's hilarious that the author thinks that it's mostly "Hollywood" types and Donald Trump that only fits into that category.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #3 September 24, 2007 Looks like they swallowed the ATA propaganda.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #4 September 24, 2007 I guess they believe all the Lefty Liberals fly around in private jets so... MAKE EM PAY. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 898 #5 September 24, 2007 interesting group... CAGW Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #6 September 24, 2007 No wonder the Right Wingers here love this group so much.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 898 #7 September 24, 2007 impressive work they did with the whole tobacco lobbying though...very much so. and yet THEY are worried about government spending??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #8 September 24, 2007 Conservative think tanks nowadays are really good at justifying ANYTHING that supports the military-industrial complex and a way to support them by having nice little wars. ANYTHING beyond that is wastefull government. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
