billvon 3,120 #76 August 30, 2007 >And if the "child" initiates that discussion? You're kidding, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #77 August 30, 2007 Quote>And if the "child" initiates that discussion? You're kidding, right? I would never joke about such a minor matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
georgerussia 0 #78 August 31, 2007 I was always sure that most of those who are strongly against gay marriage are gay themselves. And the real reason they are against it is that they promised their gay partner to marry, and now do not want to. After all, if you are not gay, why should you be against?* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. * Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
georgerussia 0 #79 August 31, 2007 Quote (the average among heterosexuals is seven – still six more than we were designed for). This one is really funny. Just SEVEN?!? And this is even AVERAGE? What a shame.* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. * Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #80 August 31, 2007 Quote This one is really funny. Just SEVEN?!? And this is even AVERAGE? What a shame. With all the "conservatives" out there who are a major turn off to most women with their positions on what constitutes a "relationship".... it DEFINITELY brings the average down for most guys overall. That is one of the reasons they HATE Bill Clinton so much.. he actually got BLOWJOBS.....OMGJust not enough Ann Coulters to go around for them to marry since premarital sex is a HIGH CRIME.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
georgerussia 0 #81 August 31, 2007 Quote Uh - no. If you drive up to an undercover cop on a street corner, lean out of your car and offer them money for "some fun" - you may get arrested. Even if you later claim "I meant - let's go to a baseball game!" This is correct. However if you plea "not guilty" and keep silent, you'll be fine as long as you did not mention sex and money together. The important point here is that you must not claim or explain anything, even baseball game (especially if you have no idea whether any baseball games were happening at that time somewhere). A lot of people happened to screw up almost perfect case just by opening their mouth.* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. * Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
georgerussia 0 #82 August 31, 2007 Quote With all the "conservatives" out there who are a major turn off to most women with their positions on what constitutes a "relationship".... it DEFINITELY brings the average down for most guys overall. Oh, so they mean this is average for conservatives? Then I'm sorry, this number looks actually pretty high then, as most of them seems to be involved with anything else but women.* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. * Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #83 August 31, 2007 Quote Quote This one is really funny. Just SEVEN?!? And this is even AVERAGE? What a shame. With all the "conservatives" out there who are a major turn off to most women with their positions on what constitutes a "relationship".... it DEFINITELY brings the average down for most guys overall. That is one of the reasons they HATE Bill Clinton so much.. he actually got BLOWJOBS.....OMGJust not enough Ann Coulters to go around for them to marry since premarital sex is a HIGH CRIME.. Lets see... women like Bo Derek, Janine Turner, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Monica Crowley, Debbie Schlussel.... Compared to.... Barbara Streisand, Helen Thomas, Hillary Clinton, Teresa Kerry, Madeleine Albright, Janet Reno, Andrea Dworkin, Nancy Pelosi, Susan Estrich... .... yup, it's all those liberal guys getting the action...but looks like it's for pity's sake in regards to the women.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #84 August 31, 2007 Aw come on Mike.. I am SURE you might be able to find a few more women who fit on the liberal side of the aisle... that you left out of that list that are under 50 years old??? Shall I add Phylis Schlafly to yours... since you want good CONSERVATIVE women Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #85 August 31, 2007 With all the "conservatives" out there who are a major turn off to most women with their positions on what constitutes a "relationship".... it DEFINITELY brings the average down for most guys overall. Quote That is one of the reasons they HATE Bill Clinton so much.. he actually got BLOWJOBS.....OMG Too bad his wife was such a tight ass that she wouldn't climb under the desk. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #86 August 31, 2007 Quote Too bad his wife was such a tight ass that she wouldn't climb under the desk Well its good we got the thread back on track.. no wonder the conservatives are looking for so much action in the mens bathrooms Guess that explains it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #87 August 31, 2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjGu8D64cuE Keith Olberman re-enactment, based on the police transcript. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydyvr 0 #88 August 31, 2007 QuoteIf a person flirts online with a girl online pretending to be 14 but with the sexual knowledge of a sailor, arranges a meeting, shows up, talks, and then leaves, was there a crime? Yes, intent is a crime in this case, along with the nekkid pictures most of those losers sent in advance. Many of those predatory fuckheads got 4 years and up, and I'm glad about it. . . =(_8^(1) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydyvr 0 #89 August 31, 2007 QuoteCompared to.... Barbara Streisand, Helen Thomas, Hillary Clinton, Teresa Kerry, Madeleine Albright, Janet Reno, Andrea Dworkin, Nancy Pelosi, Susan Estrich... Are you claiming Janet Reno is a woman? . . =(_8^(1) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #90 August 31, 2007 Quote Quote Compared to.... Barbara Streisand, Helen Thomas, Hillary Clinton, Teresa Kerry, Madeleine Albright, Janet Reno, Andrea Dworkin, Nancy Pelosi, Susan Estrich... Are you claiming Janet Reno is a woman? I'll take his word...I don't need to see any evidence. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #91 August 31, 2007 QuoteQuoteIf a person flirts online with a girl online pretending to be 14 but with the sexual knowledge of a sailor, arranges a meeting, shows up, talks, and then leaves, was there a crime? Yes, intent is a crime in this case, .' What is the name of this thought crime? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #92 August 31, 2007 Quote What is the name of this thought crime? Arthur.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbrown 26 #93 September 1, 2007 And now he's resigning from the Senate. another "family values" caught with his dick in a - oh, never mind..... I could give a shit about what he's done if his partei hadn't acted like such a bunch of assholes about anybody else doing the same thing for so many years. The Nazis had a lot of closet cases too, even as they were shipping the ones who got caught off to the camps. Good riddance I say, out with the garbage and in with the new, even if it's just fresher garbage. Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydyvr 0 #94 September 1, 2007 QuoteWhat is the name of this thought crime? Intent to permanently fuck up a childs life? . . =(_8^(1) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #95 September 2, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteIf a person flirts online with a girl online pretending to be 14 but with the sexual knowledge of a sailor, arranges a meeting, shows up, talks, and then leaves, was there a crime? Yes, intent is a crime in this case, .' What is the name of this thought crime? It is not a thought crime. A criminal act has 2 elements: criminal intent, and an overt act in furtherance of the criminal intent. In the absence of either element, no crime exists. If an intended crime is attempted, but not completed, it is a criminal attempt. Generally speaking, intent alone, without an overt act in furtherance of that intent, is not a crime. Neither is an act, alone, if not motivated by criminal intent. Sometimes it's debatable whether the person had the criminal intent, or whether his act was an actual attempt to further the intent. For those instances, we have a device to determine what it was: trial by jury. An imperfect device, to be sure, but woe to those who live in countries where it's not available. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #96 September 3, 2007 QuoteQuote (the average among heterosexuals is seven – still six more than we were designed for). This one is really funny. Just SEVEN?!? And this is even AVERAGE? What a shame. Mammalian species with multiple partners generally have males larger than females. Species with one partner generally have males and females of the same size. Which suggests that humans evolved (or were created, if you prefer) with multiple partners as the expectation.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
georgerussia 0 #97 September 3, 2007 Quote What is the name of this thought crime? 288(a) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS ACTS WITH CHILD UNDER 14 YEARS* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. * Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #98 September 5, 2007 QuoteSometimes it's debatable whether the person had the criminal intent, or whether his act was an actual attempt to further the intent. For those instances, we have a device to determine what it was: trial by jury. An imperfect device, to be sure, but woe to those who live in countries where it's not available. Quite imperfect, as shown here. More like trial by mob with rope. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #99 September 5, 2007 Well it sounds like it will go on.. he is reconsidering his decision to resign.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20593999/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #100 September 5, 2007 Quote Well it sounds like it will go on.. he is reconsidering his decision to resign.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20593999/ heh - party politics have entered the ring. If he was a Representative instead of a Senator I think the GOP would pay him to get out of Dodge now, but the fear of losing that seat along with the White House next year has a way of changing morality codes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
