willard 0 #1 August 24, 2007 How else could it possibly be explained? www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,294359,00.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #2 August 24, 2007 Don't you go frettin' now. I'm sure some of the "Big Bang is fact" types will have a conclusive explanation in no time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #3 August 24, 2007 QuoteDon't you go frettin' now. I'm sure some of the "Big Bang is fact" types will have a conclusive explanation in no time. Yeah... Them darn scientisists....Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #4 August 24, 2007 QuoteDon't you go frettin' now. I'm sure some of the "Big Bang is fact" types will have a conclusive explanation in no time. Not necessary. Anything that's not forbidden is likely to happen somewhere in the universe.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #5 August 25, 2007 Quote Don't you go frettin' now. I'm sure some of the "Big Bang is fact" types will have a conclusive explanation in no time. But...but...but the fact that nothing can be seen there is supreme evidence that FSM is actually there! He doesn't WANT to be seen, so we don't see him...only nothingness. What more proof could you want???? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #6 August 25, 2007 Quote Quote Don't you go frettin' now. I'm sure some of the "Big Bang is fact" types will have a conclusive explanation in no time. But...but...but the fact that nothing can be seen there is supreme evidence that FSM is actually there! He doesn't WANT to be seen, so we don't see him...only nothingness. What more proof could you want???? Well, for once I am inclined to agree with you... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #7 August 27, 2007 QuoteDon't you go frettin' now. I'm sure some of the "Big Bang is fact" types will have a conclusive explanation in no time. Or we could throw away our massive amoun ts of consistent evidence, and the results of experiments such as COBE which match with incredible accuracy the predictions of big bang theory and instead just accept that god made everything and these little oddities are just his fatherly way of messing with our minds. Yeah, lets do that.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #8 August 27, 2007 >Yeah... Them darn scientisists.... Yep. They still haven't explained how the earth can be a sphere when it looks perfectly flat to me - and the bible says you can see the whole earth from the top of a tree or a mountain. But I guess those things don't fit into their little so-called "consensus" that the planet is round, so they reject it! Fortunately there are still flat earthers out there willing to look at ALL the evidence without being biased by the liberal press into believing the secular religion of round earthism. (Want to hear something scary? There are people who put globes in their homes in places of honor and practically have their kids pray to it!) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mockingbird 0 #9 August 28, 2007 Bill, I see your bible hermeneutic still needs some work! Blue skies & happy jitters ~Mockingbird "Why is there something rather than nothing?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
