rushmc 23 #26 July 13, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Because he did not dohas not YET been found guilty of anything illeagal? So, we can't let the system run for him huh? I thought the system, that you defend so hard for Libby, says he is inocent until found guilty and hell man, he hasn't even been charged? So which is it ? Should the system be allowed to run or not? Hhhhmmmmmm? Just correcting your logic, mate. (1) We don't know if he's done anything illegal or not. Which is why you support fishing trips like what happened to Libby and was tried on Rush Limbaugh!! (by the way, a court found that Florida could not do that to Rush so since it went through the system are you OK with that??)(2) He can be dismissed without having been found guilty by a court.Sure, but what does that have to do with the context of this thread? (Oh, I remember, you like misdirection and misleading off topic posts) A "Caesar's wife" kind of thing. If I remember right all are inocent in this country until proven otherwise. But, I know for you it is how serious the charge is because that is what turns your crankSo, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,588 #27 July 13, 2007 Quote So, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing Neither was Janet Reno. So I guess you're OK with that, too, right? Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #28 July 13, 2007 Quote So, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing Is lying to Congress illegal? It seems he's done that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #29 July 13, 2007 Quote Quote So, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing Neither was Janet Reno. So I guess you're OK with that, too, right? Wendy W. Now you're talking about politics. Most of people screaming Gonzalez's ouster seem intent on trying to make this about something much more serious than partisanship. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #30 July 13, 2007 Quote Quote So, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing Is lying to Congress illegal? It seems he's done that. I love this one"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #31 July 13, 2007 Quote Quote Quote So, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing Is lying to Congress illegal? It seems he's done that. I love this one I'm unclear why you think it funny when the AG lies to Congress. By John Solomon Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, July 10, 2007; A01 As he sought to renew the USA Patriot Act two years ago, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales assured lawmakers that the FBI had not abused its potent new terrorism-fighting powers. "There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse," Gonzales told senators on April 27, 2005. Six days earlier, the FBI sent Gonzales a copy of a report that said its agents had obtained personal information that they were not entitled to have. It was one of at least half a dozen reports of legal or procedural violations that Gonzales received in the three months before he made his statement to the Senate intelligence committee, according to internal FBI documents released under the Freedom of Information Act. The acts recounted in the FBI reports included unauthorized surveillance, an illegal property search and a case in which an Internet firm improperly turned over a compact disc with data that the FBI was not entitled to collect, the documents show. Gonzales was copied on each report that said administrative rules or laws protecting civil liberties and privacy had been violated. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #32 July 13, 2007 Here is a "fair and balanced" opinion from FOX News.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #33 July 13, 2007 Quote Quote Quote So, why is he still in office? Cause he aint even been charged let along proven guilty of anything Dam the hypocrisy here (not to mention the irony) is amazing Neither was Janet Reno. So I guess you're OK with that, too, right? Wendy W. Now you're talking about politics. Most of people screaming Gonzalez's ouster seem intent on trying to make this about something much more serious than partisanship. Maybe it's because people don't like a dishonest AG. www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Play/17459/1/TDS-Gonzo-Comey.wmv/ From his own mouth.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #34 July 13, 2007 Maybe its also because, live Cheney, he's not part of the Legislative, Judiciary or Executive branches....Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #35 July 14, 2007 QuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. All I'm hearing is that he may, or may not have consulted with the President, who dismissed several AGs. ....and...So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #36 July 14, 2007 QuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. All I'm hearing is that he may, or may not have consulted with the President, who dismissed several AGs. ....and... I'm trying to figure that one out, myself...especially seeing as how, in '93, Clinton/Reno fired 93 of them...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #37 July 14, 2007 Quote Quote Because he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. All I'm hearing is that he may, or may not have consulted with the President, who dismissed several AGs. ....and... It is starting to get to them. How many investigation, acusations and charges have we seen? And they can't get a big one yet."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #38 July 14, 2007 So I see how you guys REALLLY see morality ... and all that crap you lay at Clintons feet about lieing... but you are just peachy keen when Gonzales does it.. even some of his subordinates grew a set of balls and told the truth... Party of Morality.. RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.. Good to know you fully support liars.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #39 July 14, 2007 Quote So I see how you guys REALLLY see morality ... and all that crap you lay at Clintons feet about lieing... but you are just peachy keen when Gonzales does it.. even some of his subordinates grew a set of balls and told the truth... Party of Morality.. RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.. Good to know you fully support liars.. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #40 July 14, 2007 QuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #41 July 14, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming. Okay, that's probably one of the rare instances where you gave me a straight answer. If that is what happened, why is the press not making an issue with it? In fact, why aren't members of Congress at their usual shrill level about it? Seriously, even Katie Couric isn't talking about this. I think there could be a piece missing from your assessment.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #42 July 14, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming. Okay, that's probably one of the rare instances where you gave me a straight answer. If that is what happened, why is the press not making an issue with it? In fact, why aren't members of Congress at their usual shrill level about it? Seriously, even Katie Couric isn't talking about this. I think there could be a piece missing from your assessment. to avoid repetition: www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2881993#2881993 And then there are his completely contradictory statements about the role of Deputy AG McNulty in the firings of the US attorneys.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #43 July 14, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming. Okay, that's probably one of the rare instances where you gave me a straight answer. If that is what happened, why is the press not making an issue with it? In fact, why aren't members of Congress at their usual shrill level about it? Seriously, even Katie Couric isn't talking about this. I think there could be a piece missing from your assessment. to avoid repetition: www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2881993#2881993 And then there are his completely contradictory statements about the role of Deputy AG McNulty in the firings of the US attorneys. Again, there is little to anything to be found about this in the broad view. Procedural or technical violations beging "reported" does not equal what he worded as "...verified case..." What I think is funny about all of this is that nobody gave a sh*t about AG Gonzales when he replaced Ashcroft. It wasn't until the press reported (in a small amount btw) about the President dismissing some AGs, and since then it's been pretty much one guy, Sen. Schumer leading the chant at the wailing wall. The rest have literally been "sheep to the slaughter"...people are just yelling, "He's bad! He's Bad!" All because of what a couple reporters and one Senator are saying. Not even the politics behind it is strong, there's been no avalanche of condemnation outside of a few Senators. If there was something of substance at this point, it would have broke out by now.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #44 July 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system??"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #45 July 15, 2007 You are forgetting WHERE the stuff came from that the Supremes have shot down as unconstitutional.... his "legal" opinions on how to treat prisoners... how to treat enemy combatants.... what the administration can do to circumvent the constitution..... you can lay most of that crap right at his feet. He is the worst kind of YES MAN.. coing up with unconstitutional ways for the Administration to circumvent our laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites birdlike 0 #46 July 15, 2007 Quote The guy has no respect for the Constitution, nor the civil liberties of Americans. How has he not been kicked out of office? I agree. I was about to say that we'd be even better off with Janet Reno but then I realized... that'd just be fuckin' crazy! She was a Constitution-shreddin' fuckin' psychopath!Spirits fly on dangerous missions Imaginations on fire Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #47 July 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #48 July 16, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Because he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming. Overwhelming? Wow! I await the trial that will convict him. If that does not happen then he has followed in the footsteps of your hero"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #49 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #50 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count? I think you missed this bit: Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
Amazon 7 #45 July 15, 2007 You are forgetting WHERE the stuff came from that the Supremes have shot down as unconstitutional.... his "legal" opinions on how to treat prisoners... how to treat enemy combatants.... what the administration can do to circumvent the constitution..... you can lay most of that crap right at his feet. He is the worst kind of YES MAN.. coing up with unconstitutional ways for the Administration to circumvent our laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
birdlike 0 #46 July 15, 2007 Quote The guy has no respect for the Constitution, nor the civil liberties of Americans. How has he not been kicked out of office? I agree. I was about to say that we'd be even better off with Janet Reno but then I realized... that'd just be fuckin' crazy! She was a Constitution-shreddin' fuckin' psychopath!Spirits fly on dangerous missions Imaginations on fire Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #47 July 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #48 July 16, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Because he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming. Overwhelming? Wow! I await the trial that will convict him. If that does not happen then he has followed in the footsteps of your hero"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #49 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #50 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count? I think you missed this bit: Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
rushmc 23 #48 July 16, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Because he did not do anything illeagal? I'm still waiting to find out what it is, exactly he did wrong. Lying to Congress is OK with you? The evidence for that is overwhelming. Overwhelming? Wow! I await the trial that will convict him. If that does not happen then he has followed in the footsteps of your hero"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #49 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #50 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count? I think you missed this bit: Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
kallend 2,148 #50 July 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBecause he did not do anything illeagal? This fact (at this point despite your greatest hopes) that he has not been convicted of anything illeagal. Come on kallend, this is for the courts to decide. Just like they did with Libby. You defended that procedure vehomanlty. Do you now have a change of heart in the justice system?? Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. Gonzales is an embarrassment to his position. It is inappropriate for someone who lies in congressional hearings, who advises the president to circumvent the Constitution and who considers the Geneva Conventions "quaint" to be the AG of the USA. Even though I disagreed with Ashcroft, he was an honorable man. Gonzales is not. Ooook, so running someone out of office politically is ok when it agrees with your postion. In this case a court and trial does not count? I think you missed this bit: Libby resigned prior to being convicted. Agnew resigned prior to being convicted. Nixon resigned prior to being charged. Delay resigned prior to being convicted. This thread is about resignation, not conviction. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
