juanesky 0 #26 July 10, 2007 Isn't it nice that on a proved child molester, an University professor has no better response but "so and so lied". I'll remember this pearl of wisdom next time I see a post in regards to the state of education in the US. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #27 July 10, 2007 >Equally as much as Gerry Studds was a child molester . . . ?? Really? Was he convicted of such a crime? That's news to me. All I ever heard about was his relationship with a 17 year old page (legal age of consent was 16) but I surely could have missed something. He was censured for that since the house figured it showed a breach of duty. >the difference is that the Repubs *do* make their people resign . . . ?? The republican who was reprimanded for his relationship with a 17 year old page the same time (Crane) won the republican primary a year later. Apparently repubs of the time DID approve of such things. (Which isn't so strange; no crime had been committed.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #28 July 10, 2007 QuoteQuote Equally as much as Gerry Studds was a child molester before and during his run in Congress - the difference is that the Repubs *do* make their people resign, while the Dems applaud theirs when they refuse to. Gonzales has been caught lying and hasn't resigned. Cheney has been caught lying and hasn't resigned. Rumsfeld was caught lying and didn't resign. It remains to be seen what the party will make Vetter will do, doesn't it? Can't find an example from Congress, so you go to the executive? Weak sauce, Doc... weak sauce...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #29 July 10, 2007 Quote>Equally as much as Gerry Studds was a child molester . . . ?? Really? Was he convicted of such a crime? That's news to me. All I ever heard about was his relationship with a 17 year old page (legal age of consent was 16) but I surely could have missed something. He was censured for that since the house figured it showed a breach of duty. >the difference is that the Repubs *do* make their people resign . . . ?? The republican who was reprimanded for his relationship with a 17 year old page the same time (Crane) won the republican primary a year later. Apparently repubs of the time DID approve of such things. (Which isn't so strange; no crime had been committed.) Shall I look up the number of Libs here in the forum calling Foley a child molester for sending emails to pages over the age of consent? Again, typical Lib double standards...fine for me but not for thee.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #30 July 10, 2007 Quote>Equally as much as Gerry Studds was a child molester . . . ?? Really? Was he convicted of such a crime? That's news to me. All I ever heard about was his relationship with a 17 year old page (legal age of consent was 16) but I surely could have missed something. He was censured for that since the house figured it showed a breach of duty. >the difference is that the Repubs *do* make their people resign . . . ?? The republican who was reprimanded for his relationship with a 17 year old page the same time (Crane) won the republican primary a year later. Apparently repubs of the time DID approve of such things. (Which isn't so strange; no crime had been committed.) And Neither has Gonzales been even indicted. But is ok, because you back Kallends beliefs"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dorbie 0 #31 July 10, 2007 These vocal puritanical types seem to be caught in compromising positions with enough regularity to make one suspect that it's an indicator for deviance. The guy's a stinking hypocrite of the lowest kind. If he wants to get caught in a hooker's little black book that's his business but he should STFU when it comes to pronouncements on sin & family values. Given his track record on the aforementioned issues he should be disqualified from public office on the grounds that he's just too much of a skunk even amongst skunks. There's something uniquely vile about someone who does this and then mentions God, sin & family and the forgiveness he's already received in an ass covering apology after being caught red handed. Shame on Louisiana if the reelect the douche. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #32 July 10, 2007 >Again, typical Lib double standards...fine for me but not for thee. That is a perfect description of _both_ parties, actually. Republicans are for family values and law and order - unless it's one of their own. Then they'll defend a man convicted of perjury, and say how it's horrible - HORRIBLE! - that people are destroying this good, upstanding citizen. Democrats are always talking about how they're the party of the middle class and thus not part of K street - until a democratic rep is found with $100K in his freezer. Then it's "innocent until proven guilty." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dorbie 0 #33 July 10, 2007 Quote Again, typical Lib double standards...fine for me but not for thee. Do you even see the irony of writing that in this thread? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #34 July 10, 2007 Quote Isn't it nice that on a proved child molester, an University professor has no better response but "so and so lied". I'll remember this pearl of wisdom next time I see a post in regards to the state of education in the US. Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #35 July 10, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuote Equally as much as Gerry Studds was a child molester before and during his run in Congress - the difference is that the Repubs *do* make their people resign, while the Dems applaud theirs when they refuse to. Gonzales has been caught lying and hasn't resigned. Cheney has been caught lying and hasn't resigned. Rumsfeld was caught lying and didn't resign. It remains to be seen what the party will make Vetter will do, doesn't it? Can't find an example from Congress, so you go to the executive? Weak sauce, Doc... weak sauce... Oh that's lame. YOUR post referred to Republicans being so quick to resign in disgrace as opposed to Democrats. I gave you a laundry list of proven Republican liars who didn't resign. I fail to see that their office is relevant.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #36 July 10, 2007 Your ORIGINAL post spoke of a CONGRESSMAN... my answer spoke of a CONGRESSMAN .... nice try, but no prize.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #37 July 10, 2007 QuoteYour ORIGINAL post spoke of a CONGRESSMAN... my answer spoke of a CONGRESSMAN .... nice try, but no prize. You're grasping at straws. The TITLE of the thread is "Another sinner in DC". I don't care a hoot which branch of government the sinner belongs too.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #38 July 11, 2007 Quote Quote Isn't it nice that on a proved child molester, an University professor has no better response but "so and so lied". I'll remember this pearl of wisdom next time I see a post in regards to the state of education in the US. Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10 Which topic? The one about you making unproven claims? Perhaps we should use your posts in the "When is a speed up a slow down" thread as the standard for staying on topic... or not.BTW He does raise a valid point. Oh yeah, love the Gonzalez, Cheney, Rumsfeld lied bit. Perhaps you should post some quotes and then imply they were intentional lies. That's always fun. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #39 July 11, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Isn't it nice that on a proved child molester, an University professor has no better response but "so and so lied". I'll remember this pearl of wisdom next time I see a post in regards to the state of education in the US. Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10 Which topic? The one about you making unproven claims? I guess you are the expert on the topic of unproven claims.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #40 July 11, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Isn't it nice that on a proved child molester, an University professor has no better response but "so and so lied". I'll remember this pearl of wisdom next time I see a post in regards to the state of education in the US. Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10 Which topic? The one about you making unproven claims? I guess you are the expert on the topic of unproven claims. Clearly that was a joke. Sorry you seem to have such a hard time with that one. Now some people around here just seem to be pathological liars. They make unsupportable claims and then seem incapable of owning up when their bullshit is exposed. Scary. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #41 July 11, 2007 Ahh, but apparently the professor is ok with an adult having sex with a child, that does not irk him as much as someone lying. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #42 July 11, 2007 Quote Ahh, but apparently the professor is ok with an adult having sex with a child, that does not irk him as much as someone lying. Making up absurd claims about me doesn't help your case. Try sticking to facts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #43 July 11, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Isn't it nice that on a proved child molester, an University professor has no better response but "so and so lied". I'll remember this pearl of wisdom next time I see a post in regards to the state of education in the US. Why don't you try to stay on topic, since you are so quick to criticize others. Irony score 10/10 Which topic? The one about you making unproven claims? I guess you are the expert on the topic of unproven claims. Clearly that was a joke. . Clearly that is weaseling.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #44 July 11, 2007 QuoteMaking up absurd claims about me doesn't help your case. Try sticking to facts. What's that saying about practicing what you preach? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #45 July 11, 2007 Quote Quote Clearly that was a joke. . Clearly that is weaseling. Sorry you seem to have such a hard time with that one. It was a joke. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #46 July 11, 2007 Yep, same shit, different day... carry on gang. I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TypicalFish 0 #47 July 11, 2007 Quote Yep, same shit, different day... carry on gang. EXACTLY. SC actually used to be an informative venue. So much for the good old days. "I gargle no man's balls..." ussfpa on SOCNET Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #48 July 11, 2007 >SC actually used to be an informative venue. I think perhaps you are thinking of Bonfire. SC was formed specifically to have a place to put arguments like this one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #49 July 11, 2007 Quote>SC actually used to be an informative venue. I think perhaps you are thinking of Bonfire. . Right, I've learned a lot about boobies, piercings, tattoos, movies and TV shows from Bonfire.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #50 July 11, 2007 QuoteQuote>SC actually used to be an informative venue. I think perhaps you are thinking of Bonfire. . Right, I've learned a lot about boobies, piercings, tattoos, movies and TV shows from Bonfire. Ah, but have you GOTTEN any boobies, piercings, tattoos, or seen any TV shows or movies as a result of the Bonfire? I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
