akarunway 1 #1 July 2, 2007 http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usbush0703,0,3656692,print.story?coll=ny-top-headlines I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #2 July 2, 2007 They are above the laws of this country..The trampling all over the Constitution for the last 6 years.. the freedom to torture ......did you EVER have a doubt??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #3 July 2, 2007 As predicted. I still think it's a steaming pile of poo.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,117 #4 July 2, 2007 What a surprise - NOT.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikkey 0 #5 July 2, 2007 As a non-american, let me see if I understand it. So a President can free aides who are convicted for obstruction of justice, which they committed to ensure that said President or his VP are not implicated in a scandal/unlawful action? Isn't this a huge hole in the principle of seperation of power in the US?--------------------------------------------------------- When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 35 #6 July 2, 2007 Quote They are above the laws of this country..The trampling all over the Constitution for the last 6 years.. the freedom to torture ......did you EVER have a doubt??? What I don't understand is why haven't Bush and Cheney been impeached? "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #7 July 2, 2007 It would be a HUGE waste of time... NOW.. if they DO actually leave office....... let the World Court have them... ALL of them... the whole PNAC gang who took us to an unnessary war based on lies and deciet and greed.. instead of finishing the job in Afghanistan with the people who actually did attack our homeland. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Para_Frog 1 #8 July 2, 2007 QuoteThey are above the laws of this country..The trampling all over the Constitution for the last 6 years.. the freedom to torture ......did you EVER have a doubt??? Two words: Marc Rich Hypocracy abounds once again.- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Para_Frog 1 #9 July 2, 2007 Quote What a surprise - NOT. I completely concur. It would have happened under any administration and been a waste of tax dollars just the same. Everyone knew it going in...yet the trial proceeded. THAT is what pisses me off.- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #10 July 2, 2007 The President can commute sentences or pardon individuals. Governors can do the same thing, for state crimes. A bit of interesting reading[ for you.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #11 July 2, 2007 Quote HypocracyHypocrisy abounds once again. Fixed it for you and I got your hypocrisy right here my "intellectual" friend. Next PHALACY ( spelled that way on purpose) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/18/politics/main709678.shtml Bush Vows To Fire Leak Criminals President Shifts Language On CIA Leaks; Still No Comment On Rove Mr. Bush said in June 2004 that he would fire anyone in his administration shown to have leaked information that exposed the identity of Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, an outspoken critic of the president's Iraq policy. On Monday, however, he added the qualifier that it would have to be shown that a crime was committed. Not all such disclosures necessarily rise to the level of crime, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,117 #12 July 2, 2007 QuoteQuoteThey are above the laws of this country..The trampling all over the Constitution for the last 6 years.. the freedom to torture ......did you EVER have a doubt??? Two words: Marc Rich Hypocracy abounds once again. Are you suggesting that two wrongs make a right? Some more words: Caspar Weinberger Robert McFarlane Dick Poindexter Ollie North Elliot Abrams Alan Fiers Clair George Duane Clarridge... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #13 July 2, 2007 Quote Mr. Bush said in June 2004 that he would fire anyone in his administration shown to have leaked information that exposed the identity of Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, an outspoken critic of the president's Iraq policy. Well, on the bright side, this should give Jon Stewart some juicy material for "The Daily Show"."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikkey 0 #14 July 2, 2007 Quote Quote Mr. Bush said in June 2004 that he would fire anyone in his administration shown to have leaked information that exposed the identity of Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, an outspoken critic of the president's Iraq policy. Well, on the bright side, this should give Jon Stewart some juicy material for "The Daily Show". I love Jon Stewart! Funny as.. so lucky that we have our own Comedy channel down under so we can see shows like this, Colbert etc.--------------------------------------------------------- When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Para_Frog 1 #15 July 2, 2007 No, not at all. But our bubbly little friend probably has a litany of excuses for Mr. Bill.- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Para_Frog 1 #16 July 2, 2007 Libby didn't leak...Libby lied. Get back on track.- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #17 July 2, 2007 QuoteLibby didn't leak...Libby lied. Get back on track. Incorrect. He did both, but was only brought up on charges for one.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Para_Frog 1 #18 July 2, 2007 QuoteQuoteLibby didn't leak...Libby lied. Get back on track. Incorrect. He did both, but was only brought up on charges for one. Well...because they couldn't prove, at least the US Atty didn't think, that he did. I personally think the leak was higher and Novak should have been indicted for publishing classified information. But that would make me a civil rights abusing nazi according to buffy.- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #19 July 2, 2007 QuoteQuoteLibby didn't leak...Libby lied. Get back on track. Incorrect. He did both, but was only brought up on charges for one. Armitage leaked, not Libby.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Para_Frog 1 #20 July 2, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteLibby didn't leak...Libby lied. Get back on track. Incorrect. He did both, but was only brought up on charges for one. Armitage leaked, not Libby. Ding ding ding. You win a cookie. And bless his heart...it wasn't out of spite. He just had a very dumbass moment. And owned up to it.- Harvey, BASE 1232 TAN-I, IAD-I, S&TA BLiNC Magazine Team Member Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #21 July 3, 2007 Gee that is what your Boss said.. you saying he lied too??? Notice all the firings that took place for her getting outed..rhe whole gang of thieves in the White House who played politics rather than worrying about paltry things like Serving the Country. Oh thats right..... the RIGHT wingers have closed ranks.. she was not really a CIA agent.. she never had any contacts in those countries she was stationed in...gee that means those she worked with weren't really outed by the disclosure either in her pursuit of intelligence.. I guess she never was really serving her country Since she is not in the right wing.. she never could have served this country at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #22 July 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteThey are above the laws of this country..The trampling all over the Constitution for the last 6 years.. the freedom to torture ......did you EVER have a doubt??? Two words: Marc Rich Hypocracy abounds once again. Are you suggesting that two wrongs make a right? Some more words: Caspar Weinberger Robert McFarlane Dick Poindexter Ollie North Elliot Abrams Alan Fiers Clair George Duane Clarridge John Dean (White House counsel) H.R. Haldeman (President's Chief of Staff) John Erlichman (Senior Aide to President) John Mitchell (Attorney General) G. Gordon Liddy Charles Colson Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #23 July 3, 2007 Quote But that would make me a civil rights abusing nazi according to buffy. Not really BubbaBuffy... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,117 #24 July 3, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote They are above the laws of this country..The trampling all over the Constitution for the last 6 years.. the freedom to torture ......did you EVER have a doubt??? Two words: Marc Rich Hypocracy abounds once again. Are you suggesting that two wrongs make a right? Some more words: Caspar Weinberger Robert McFarlane Dick Poindexter Ollie North Elliot Abrams Alan Fiers Clair George Duane Clarridge John Dean (White House counsel) H.R. Haldeman (President's Chief of Staff) John Erlichman (Senior Aide to President) John Mitchell (Attorney General) G. Gordon Liddy Charles Colson I didn't think the kids were old enough to remember those guys.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #25 July 3, 2007 QuoteAs a non-american, let me see if I understand it. So a President can free aides who are convicted for obstruction of justice, which they committed to ensure that said President or his VP are not implicated in a scandal/unlawful action? Isn't this a huge hole in the principle of seperation of power in the US? The answer to your immediate question is: Yes. A sitting President may pardon or commute the sentence of any individual. I'm not aware of any exception. To answer the context of your question: There was no unlawful action on the part of the people whom this aide worked with. There was no unlawful leak. The Vice-President didn't cover anything up. The President didn't cover anything up. In fact, the person who "leaked" the name, Richard Armitage, didn't cover anything up either (so much so that he was charged with nothing in violation of any law). Scooter Libby was convicted of lying to a prosecutor. His conviction stands, his fine stands, his prison term was commuted. I would like to know if he is still able to continue his appeal. I'm guessing yes.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites