0
jenfly00

Historical perspectives

Recommended Posts

Quote

...Studying the past to predict the future is a complete red herring in my opinion....



Studying history to shape the future is what it's all about. Unfortunately, the lessons learned from the mistakes of the past are generally not heeded.

Many parallels of Hitler and Hussein can be made. Fortunately Saddam was stopped before he got as far along in his own "final solution".

Unfortunately, what was not stopped was the communist Vietnamese's "re-education" and Cambodia's Pol Pot's "purification".
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hard to say. I hope to live another 30 or 40 years, so should see it from at least that perspective. My guess is that they are going to be looked on very poorly.

Funny though, the historical perspective does not always end the debates, they just become a bit more civil. Instead of highly polarized pissing contests, they become just a touch more scholarly in nature.

I've read several of the History-of-Everything type comprehensive looks at humanity and the amazing thing is that they are all at least slightly different. Go figure.

But I'll stick by my guess is that there will be general agreement that this administration was not good for our future.
" . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

my thoughts exactly. I had an Alzheimer's patient ex-Nazi. tell everyone about his experience. he said that the Nazi's came into his school and asked for volunteers. Those who didn't volunteer, weren't heard from again. So he volunteered.



I guess since they were with him ... rather than against him... they were rewarded by being with the party... hmm where have we heard that before..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Good luck getting anyone to recognize these here.



Why???

The kiiling fields of Cambodia are well documented.
No such event took place after the fall of Saigon... in Vietnam the VC had already eliminated many of the elders and intellectuals that opposed them while we were there and "protecting" them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

my thoughts exactly. I had an Alzheimer's patient ex-Nazi. tell everyone about his experience. he said that the Nazi's came into his school and asked for volunteers. Those who didn't volunteer, weren't heard from again. So he volunteered.



I guess since they were with him ... rather than against him... they were rewarded by being with the party... hmm where have we heard that before..



Same can be said of any administration this country has endured. Big difference is that under Hitler, if you didn't agree you didn't exist for long. I honestly don't think anyone has to fear that here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

the communist Vietnamese's "re-education" and Cambodia's Pol Pot's "purification"


Good luck getting anyone to recognize these here.



A couple years ago I had a professor who had escaped the "purification" of Cambodia when he was in his early teens. He somehow managed to make his way into the U.S where he found work and got his education. The tales he told of the atrocities were hard to believe but were typical of those from others who lived through it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Same can be said of any administration this country has endured. Big difference is that under Hitler, if you didn't agree you didn't exist for long. I honestly don't think anyone has to fear that here.



I guess we will revisit this AFTER martial law is declared... THEN I think some other groups of Americans will be in the same boat as many American muslims have been for the last 5 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Same can be said of any administration this country has endured. Big difference is that under Hitler, if you didn't agree you didn't exist for long. I honestly don't think anyone has to fear that here.



I guess we will revisit this AFTER martial law is declared... THEN I think some other groups of Americans will be in the same boat as many American muslims have been for the last 5 years.


Martial law?? Whatever makes you think martial law will be declared anytime in the future? :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/20/185048.shtml

There ya go.... and I was sure to use an approved Right Wing news source.:S:S:S:S:S



Ahhh...I see. You do realize, of course, that is the opinion of one man? And that he was talking a hypothetical situation? And that the decision to institute martial law is not his?
Sorry I was confused. I thought you were inferring that martial law was imminent at somepoint. There is a whole lot that would have to happen, most of which has never happened before, in order for the circunstances to even evolve to the point where martial law could even be considered.
Also, I don't think it is safe to assume the military leaders would blindly follow Bushhead if he tried to impose ML.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there is a BIG election coming up.. and many on the right feel that Bush is on a MISSION FROM GOD.. and only he has the vision and is able to face up to the evildoers that want to harm us.:S:S:S

I am REALLLY not looking forward to doing a HUGE... told ya so... but I will:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The kiiling fields of Cambodia are well documented.
No such event took place after the fall of Saigon... in Vietnam the VC had already eliminated many of the elders and intellectuals that opposed them while we were there and "protecting" them.


Sorry to assume... I thought that people who were familiar with pol pot would be a little slower to beleive G.W. Bush was a good comparison to Hitler.

I stand corrected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But there is a BIG election coming up.. and many on the right feel that Bush is on a MISSION FROM GOD.. and only he is has the vision and is able to face up to the evildoers that want to harm us.:S:S:S

I am REALLLY not looking forward to doing a HUGE... told ya so... but I will:D



Yep, there sure are a bunch of far-right folk who feel that way. Fortunatly they are a very small minority.


As far as Gen. Franks and his concerns over martial law, explain how you can believe and trust his views on that subject when I know you will call "bullshit" at his opinion of Bush. As quoted form the article you posted the link to...
Quote

“As I look at President Bush, I think he will ultimately be judged as a man of extremely high character. A very thoughtful man, not having been appraised properly by those who would say he’s not very smart. I find the contrary. I think he’s very, very bright. And I suspect that he’ll be judged as a man who led this country through a crease in history effectively. Probably we’ll think of him in years to come as an American hero.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Same can be said of any administration this country has endured. Big difference is that under Hitler, if you didn't agree you didn't exist for long. I honestly don't think anyone has to fear that here.



I guess we will revisit this AFTER martial law is declared... THEN I think some other groups of Americans will be in the same boat as many American muslims have been for the last 5 years.



Yeah, you keep saying that... but here's the killer for THAT bullshit -

What BETTER excuse could they have had to declare martial law THAN 9/11, if they were so hot to do it? This "waiting for another attack" crap is exactly that....crap. (and NO, I don't really give a shit what Tommy Franks' opinion on it is )
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Many parallels of Hitler and Hussein can be made. Fortunately Saddam was stopped before he got as far along in his own "final solution".



I don't remember Hitler being close friends with the U.S

Quote


Unfortunately, what was not stopped was the communist Vietnamese's "re-education" and Cambodia's Pol Pot's "purification".



Good luck getting anyone to recognize these here.



Why?

Because some of us are quick to point out the rank hypocrisy and forgetfulness towards the long list of US committed crimes?

No I think we can all agree Pol Pot was not very nice, the difference is some of us don't have blinkers on that exclude scrutinizing western action in the same way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Obviously he is one of the true believers.. BUT being at that level of authority... he does have insight to a mindset that is obviously present and just waiting.



So, in other words, if you agree with him he is an all-seeing prophet, but if you don't he is a right-wing radical who blindly follows W. And some people get to call him both depending on what subject he is talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


and I wonder ...what will their historical perspective be?



That is possibly the most conceited post I've read here.

You seem completely oblivious to your sin of comparing your fellow travellers to Hitler's Nazis in the most glib and unsupported way while managing to avoid any iota of introspection concerning your own political opinions in a greater historical context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Wow, are you comparing germany under Hitler to the U.S. under GWB?



I was referring to the etiology of national and curtural shifts. They don't just spring up out of the blue.

In the beginning, at least, you have a strong leader and loyal patriots who love their country. These 'instinctual mind' types are easily swept up in nationalism ...jingoists, if you will.

Then they start eroding national and personal freedoms ...in the name of national and personal freedoms.
Once starting down that slippery slope, where does it go?

Beginning to see the connection yet?
-----------------------
"O brave new world that has such people in it".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


and I wonder ...what will their historical perspective be?



That is possibly the most conceited post I've read here.

You seem completely oblivious to your sin of comparing your fellow travellers to Hitler's Nazis in the most glib and unsupported way while managing to avoid any iota of introspection concerning your own political opinions in a greater historical context.



I suspected you would have difficulty seeing the problems.
-----------------------
"O brave new world that has such people in it".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



The thing that really makes me wonder is - how many of them didn't really buy into the Nazi ideal, but just went along with what was happening anyway because that was what they were being told to do.



my thoughts exactly. I had an Alzheimer's patient ex-Nazi. tell everyone about his experience. he said that the Nazi's came into his school and asked for volunteers. Those who didn't volunteer, weren't heard from again. So he volunteered.



A leader can't make a major ideological or cultural shift without a significant percentage of willing, loyal followers.
-----------------------
"O brave new world that has such people in it".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I get the point you are trying to make, it's just a huge stretch. The "Jingoes" are brought together by an enemy. A dictator needs a certain group to blame the state of his own nation on, a group they can rise up and unite against. i.e. the Jews are exploiting our German workers, western europe has kept us down ever since WW1 and are embarrassing us with the peace treaty.

Here are the two reasons that come to mind.
1.
The U.S. president can use "terrorists" to blame, as an excuse for people to target their anger at, but for what. Germany was in a terrible way in the 1930s, during the great depression. They had lost the first world war and were deep in debt in retribution payment. The U.S. economy is doing pretty good, even the recession after 9/11 turned out to be minor.
The U.S. ended up becoming the lone super power on the planet during the cold war. The situations in our countries are very different. We are not suffering.

2.
The two political parties fighting for power in Germany were assasinating each other left and right, when the Nazi party was struggling for power. Both parties had paramilitary groups engaged in beating citizens while they were fighting for power. This is the situation Germany was in before the Nazi's even got into office.
If Democrats and Republicans start assasinating each other all over the place, then I'll worry about a slippery slope. If either party starts beating on independant citizens like myself, then I'll worry about a slippery slope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0