skydiverek 63 #1 March 14, 2007 Read and watch... : http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096 Please respond... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #2 March 14, 2007 QuoteRead and watch... : http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096 Please respond... Ok. If there was some huge government conspiracy to blow up the twin towers presumably this operation would have had to have been carried out with the utmost secrecy and deniability. Why then, why in God's name would they leak their plans to one of the biggest friggin' news networks on the planet? Why would they not just trust to the fact that the BBC would report the collapse of WTC-7 when it actually collapsed!? As evidence for conspiracy theories goes, it's pretty retarded.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #3 March 14, 2007 The website is claiming the BBC released information of the collapse of #7 in a newscast aired 1/2 hr before the collapse actually took place. I didn't see any evidence anywhere on that site that they were telling the truth about the time it was aired. For all we know, from info given on the site, they could be making that up. The nice sarcastic remark (Concerning #7 still there)set in text on the screen while the women tells of the empty spot in the skyline where the towers once stood means nothing more than the operators of the site don't know that pre-recorded footage is usually used in segments such as that one. This is all old accusations that have been dragged around for 5 years and not one person...NOT ONE...has come out to say they were part of it. The number of people it would have taken to pull this off would be in the hundreds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vpozzoli 0 #4 March 15, 2007 SBDD Same bullshit, different day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #5 March 15, 2007 Or SSDS. Same Shit, Different Shovel Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AdD 1 #6 March 15, 2007 Basically you know that it aired before the Solomon Building fell because you can see the building still standing in the background as they report how it collapsed. Please note that tower 7, the Solomon Brothers building, was separate from the twin towers and supposedly collapsed in a textbook demolishion style due to 'fires'.Life is ez On the dz Every jumper's dream 3 rigs and an airstream Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #7 March 15, 2007 QuoteBasically you know that it aired before the Solomon Building fell because you can see the building still standing in the background as they report how it collapsed. Please note that tower 7, the Solomon Brothers building, was separate from the twin towers and supposedly collapsed in a textbook demolishion style due to 'fires'. Ok, I'll try to explain this as simple as I can. The video playing in the background was recorded before the actual broadcast. That means they used footage from earlier in the day...maybe an hour, maybe one minute.....as background for their news anchor. You cannot use the background video as any kind of timeline simply because you don't know when it was filmed. All we can tell is that it was filmed sometime between when the towers fell and when #7 fell, and then replayed as background for the newscast. It don't mean nuthin'. I like the so-called "experts" who say the building fell in a controlled demolition manner. Why? Because it fell straight down? That's the way gravity works, it pulls things toward the center of the earth. It doesn't pull sideways, it doesn't pull up. It pulls pretty much straight down. If the people who operate these CT websites would put that much time and effort into finding altrnative energy sources we would probably be oil-independent by now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vpozzoli 0 #8 March 15, 2007 QuoteBasically you know that it aired before the Solomon Building fell because you can see the building still standing in the background as they report how it collapsed. Please note that tower 7, the Solomon Brothers building, was separate from the twin towers and supposedly collapsed in a textbook demolishion style due to 'fires'. Yeah right. I'm sure the BBC (a.k.a. the British Broadcasting Company) never heard of a gadget called "video recorder" much less owned one (I hear they're very expensive). We all know everyting you see on TV must be happening live. Vale Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #9 March 16, 2007 QuoteBasically you know that it aired before the Solomon Building fell because you can see the building still standing in the background as they report how it collapsed. Also, if you'll note in the video rolling behind them in the report, United Flight 175 actually crashed into WTC-2 five times! And the towers collapsed twice! Holy shit! How the fuck is anyone going to explain that?!? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michele 1 #10 March 16, 2007 QuoteHoly shit! How the fuck is anyone going to explain that?!? Time warp. Dude, get with the program. 'Cause if it ain't the US government, it's gotta be the Brits. If it's not them, then it is for sure aliens or reptilians. And if it isn't that, then it's John Titor the Time Traveller. And if it isn't that, then it's a backwards singularity - twice in one broadcast!!!! (It's the aliens...) C'mon...get with it already!!! Ciels- Michele ~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek While our hearts lie bleeding?~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
