0
yjumpinoz

Jesus Tomb

Recommended Posts

Yawn, old news. It was discovered in 1980. Not newsworthy from a historical point of view then, and not newsworthy now until someone thought, "Hey, the novel Davinci Code made a lot of money, this will too."

DNA to prove it was JC??? Where did they get the sample, a resident "skygod"? :S

steveOrino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

DNA to prove it was JC??? Where did they get the sample, a resident "skygod"?



I thought the DNA analysis was to show that 'Jesua' and Mary were not related and therefore likely husband and wife.

Honestly though, I really don't care.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well Im an atheist and in my opinion this discovery has very little signifance because there seems to be no real indepenedt verification that inscriptions are genuine,that the tombs came from the same place and the child is related to both man and woman in the tombs. the only DNA evidence was that the man and woman were not related.
The fact that Camereon et al did not subject their thesis to proper critical review indicates thery are not serious about historical truth.
Id love it if there were concrete proof that Jesus was buried and didnt rise from the dead but i dont think its wise to get suckered in to any old claim just because you want it to be true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0