kelpdiver 2 #26 February 11, 2007 Quote Perot split the conservative vote or else Clinton would not have won. Perot stole pretty evenly from both parties. Outside of the entertainment value, he was a non factor on results. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #27 February 11, 2007 QuoteQuote Perot split the conservative vote or else Clinton would not have won. Perot stole pretty evenly from both parties. Outside of the entertainment value, he was a non factor on results. A full 19% of those that voted in 1992, voted for Perot. It was not a non-factor.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyChimp 0 #28 February 11, 2007 Quote....Won't vote for Hilary Clinton. I think it's an exuse for Bill to have an extra third term. It would be 32 years since GB Snr to Bill To Dubya back to Senator Hill or should I say Bills extra third term before your country see's sence and votes for someone Funky, fresh and new.. If she does win, I'm moving to South Africa. Such a henious mistake, stop it now while you still can. A Brilliant Senator does her Homework (been to Iraq and Afghanistan) loves and has done so much for New York But President. I don't think so. Maybe Anthony Edwards would be a better candidate, this guy is good and is going pretty unoticed. Check on him. There are two other threads for presidential candidates. One for Republicans and one for Democrats Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #29 February 11, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuote Perot split the conservative vote or else Clinton would not have won. Perot stole pretty evenly from both parties. Outside of the entertainment value, he was a non factor on results. A full 19% of those that voted in 1992, voted for Perot. It was not a non-factor. In terms of Bush vs Clinton, it was. Unlike Nader in 2000 - despite get far fewer votes, he got enough in Florida to make the difference, and there's no doubt he took votes from Gore. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #30 February 12, 2007 And anyone wanting to move just because a Democrat will win the presidency.. PLEASE FUCKING DO... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QuoteGod I wish that would happen.Who would support the welfare state then? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #31 February 12, 2007 QuoteAnd anyone wanting to move just because a Democrat will win the presidency.. PLEASE FUCKING DO... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QuoteGod I wish that would happen.Who would support the welfare state then? Same people that did from 1992 - 2000.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #32 February 12, 2007 QuoteQuote Perot split the conservative vote or else Clinton would not have won. Perot stole pretty evenly from both parties. Outside of the entertainment value, he was a non factor on results. I would say at least 75% of all Perot voters would have gone Bush, me for 1. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #33 February 12, 2007 Quote....Won't vote for Hilary Clinton. I think it's an exuse for Bill to have an extra third term. It would be 32 years since GB Snr to Bill To Dubya back to Senator Hill or should I say Bills extra third term before your country see's sence and votes for someone Funky, fresh and new.. If she does win, I'm moving to South Africa. Such a henious mistake, stop it now while you still can. A Brilliant Senator does her Homework (been to Iraq and Afghanistan) loves and has done so much for New York But President. I don't think so. Maybe Anthony Edwards would be a better candidate, this guy is good and is going pretty unoticed. Check on him. Yes, those were horrible times...... for homophobes and those who despise the poor. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #34 February 12, 2007 QuoteQuoteA Brilliant Senator Damn, Thanks................this beat the other jokes posted today by a mile. Post senatorial votes that you disagree with and why. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #35 February 12, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuote... If she does win, I'm moving to South Africa. considering moving to Australia or NZ myself if this happens.Stay where you are we dont wont you Bahahaaha Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #36 February 12, 2007 QuoteQuote Maybe Anthony Edwards would be a better candidate, this guy is good and is going pretty unoticed. Check on him. The guy from ER is running for President? Wow! Well, I guess we've had an actor as President before so it's not unprecedented. Or maybe we would give more consideration to John Edwards Bahahahahaa, nice catch. I didn't have a clue as to what he was saying but just let it go. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #37 February 12, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuote Or maybe we would give more consideration to John EdwardsIsn't he also that idiot psychic? Well, he stands for worker's rights, unions, universal healthcare, so you might think he is that guy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
