rushmc 23 #51 January 23, 2007 QuoteWhy do some people automatically presume the reason he was taken off the plane was politically motivated? I'm sure if that was the intent then they would have also removed all the magazines (they undoubtedly contain references in opposition to Bush), banned all newspapers, etc. Why is it so hard to believe this guy might have over reacted when asked to remove or cover a shirt that the crew felt would be offensive to some of the passengers? We do a lot worse when we prohibit 99% of our school kids from praying at school on their own time so they won't offend the child of an atheist. I am with you. But the main name caller on this site has to BLAME somebody. Anger management coudl help along with a big dose of valium...."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #52 January 23, 2007 QuoteFrom Breitbart: QuoteORLANDO, Fla. (AP) -- Flight attendants often deal with obnoxious passengers who won't listen to instructions by kicking them off the plane. But a Massachusetts couple think AirTran Airways went overboard by treating their crying 3-year-old daughter in much the same way. Julie and Gerry Kulesza and daughter Elly were removed from the flight when the girl refused to take her seat before takeoff, airline officials said Tuesday. But her parents said they just needed a little more time to calm her down. The Kuleszas planned to fly home to Boston on Jan. 14 from Fort Myers after a four-day visit with the girl's paternal grandparents. She was removed because "she was climbing under the seat and hitting the parents and wouldn't get in her seat" during boarding, AirTran spokeswoman Judy Graham-Weaver said. So. Would it be OK to spank THAT 3 yr. old?I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #53 January 23, 2007 <> Damned straigh! and the parents too (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #54 January 23, 2007 QuoteBut the main name caller on this site has to BLAME somebody. Anger management coudl help along with a big dose of valium.... I will leave the dope to the dopers thanks.....you still have not answered about that whole bulls UDDER...thing Maybe that is what happens when the valium kicks in... loss of perception.... I would not know. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #55 January 23, 2007 I know exactly what I typed and why. I do not have to explain it to you"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #56 January 23, 2007 QuoteQuoteyou have to ask yourself WHO is responsible for the MOST amounts of dead human beings ( directly or indirectly) in the last 15 years? Saddam Hussein? Omar al-Bashir? The "one child only" policies of China? Not sure he's a winner, but if "indirect" deaths are part of the equation, bid Laden always beats Bush by a few thousand because his attack gave the White House the political capital necessary to commit ground troops for years of action. Otherwise it's more cruise missile attacks. Those responsible for the 3 gorges dam on the Yangtze might win this contest if the thing fails. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #57 January 23, 2007 Ah ok.. more of the same...I really did not expect anything more. Be sure to get back to us with what Lush wants you to convey to all of us after his broadcast . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #58 January 23, 2007 You can't stand it "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #59 January 23, 2007 Nah I just wanted the explanation of the Bulls udder you were tripping on... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #60 January 23, 2007 QuoteNah I just wanted the explanation of the Bulls udder you were tripping on... Know it or not, I think you are getting close"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #61 January 23, 2007 DUDE.. just because you think doing dope( since you brought up the valium thing) is kewl... not all of us partake... mmmmkkk... but go on and do what you will with your life Personally I choose a little alcohol at boogies.. the rest of the time.... clean and sober is where it is at for me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #62 January 23, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteyou have to ask yourself WHO is responsible for the MOST amounts of dead human beings ( directly or indirectly) in the last 15 years? Saddam Hussein? Omar al-Bashir? The "one child only" policies of China? Not sure he's a winner, but if "indirect" deaths are part of the equation, bid Laden always beats Bush by a few thousand because his attack gave the White House the political capital necessary to commit ground troops for years of action. Otherwise it's more cruise missile attacks. Those responsible for the 3 gorges dam on the Yangtze might win this contest if the thing fails. Hey look Amazon - someone addressed my reply to your post........ and it wasn't you. Do you have any idea who gets top billing (I'm guessing you thought it was your buddy - Dubya), or did you just post that as a conversation starter? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #63 January 23, 2007 Gee... I guess wars of convienience with Shock and Awe and the attendant " collateral damage" does not count.. try again CUPCAKE.....those are DIRECTLY attributable to your hero GW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #64 January 23, 2007 QuoteDUDE.. just because you think doing dope( since you brought up the valium thing) is kewl... not all of us partake... mmmmkkk... but go on and do what you will with your life Personally I choose a little alcohol at boogies.. the rest of the time.... clean and sober is where it is at for me. Where do you come up with this shit??"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #65 January 23, 2007 QuoteGee... I guess wars of convienience with Shock and Awe and the attendant " collateral damage" does not count.. try again CUPCAKE.....those are DIRECTLY attributable to your hero GW. Are you claiming that Bush "is responsible for the MOST amounts of dead human beings ( directly or indirectly) in the last 15 years"? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #66 January 23, 2007 I picked that number for a reason... Saddam was pretty much done killing off his opponents The Shias after Gulf War1 about that time.....I guess all the deaths there in Iraq since our invasion is THEIR fault...love that...blame the people you call "collateral Damage" Bushies Exceelent Adventure is far from over.... how many do you think will die in the impending civil war there... So in retrospect.. lets see... how many have been klilled in Rwanda in the 1990's....800,000 Congo.... about 4 million in their civil war..... BUT.. unlike Iraq... WE did not start those.. there are other factors. Want to come up with some more wars in the last 15 years llll go for it.. but I will lay odds by the time this one is done its going to be MANY millions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #67 January 23, 2007 Quoteyou have to ask yourself WHO is responsible for the MOST amounts of dead human beings ( directly or indirectly) in the last 15 years? So, by "WHO" you actually meant "which American President", right? Perhaps you should consider how you compose your questions in the future. It might help you get the answer you want. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #68 January 23, 2007 In a historical context... I will lay odds he will go down as one who gets into the top10 because of what he has done. But God told him that all people will be free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #69 January 23, 2007 QuoteIn a historical context... I will lay odds he will go down as one who gets into the top10 because of what he has done. 3.8 Million Deaths? Wow. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #70 January 23, 2007 Quoteyou have to ask yourself WHO is responsible for the MOST amounts of dead human beings ( directly or indirectly) in the last 15 years? Different versions of "god"...same as always. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #71 January 23, 2007 Wait for it.... its coming...He started this quagmire... I have a feeling the Shia and Sunni's will get there... but nev er would have had we stayed the hell out... But I guess when you break something its someone elses fault...... its the right wing way.... never take responsibility for anything that goes against THEIR beliefs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #72 January 23, 2007 QuoteIt goes like this.. flight number one.... no one complained probably because the people were not right wing nutjobs on the flight crew.. probably not americans since it was Quantas. Flight number two.. rabid Bush supporters on the flight crew who do not like to see ANYTHING that does not reflect absolute adoration upon their fearless leader. Or he acted fine on flight number one and acted like an ass on flight number two. Not everything in the world is about defending Bush or attacking him. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #73 January 23, 2007 QuoteAre you claiming that Bush "is responsible for the MOST amounts of dead human beings ( directly or indirectly) in the last 15 years"? Yes. With the exception of those who have died in shark attacks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #74 January 24, 2007 QuoteBut I guess when you break something its someone elses fault...... its the right wing way.... never take responsibility for anything that goes against THEIR beliefs. You just can't help yourself... can you? LOL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites