Butters 0 #1 January 17, 2007 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11100921/ Do you think that the amount the jury awarded is appropriate for the case?"That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #2 January 17, 2007 It makes it easier if you make it CLICKY Just click on the URL buttone before and after your link http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11100921/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,154 #3 January 17, 2007 Quotehttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11100921/ Do you think that the amount the jury awarded is appropriate for the case? Anything LESS would not send a useful message to the airline. Wasn't it AA that held a plane full of passengers on the tarmac for 8+ hours just last month. 12:27 AM CST on Saturday, December 30, 2006 By CLAIRE CUMMINGS / Special Contributor to The Dallas Morning News For more than eight hours Friday, passengers on American Airlines Flight 1348, rerouted from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport during Friday's storms, sat on the tarmac at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport – with no food, dirty toilets and frustration levels rising. They watched out their windows as planes landed and took off. Jerks!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #4 January 17, 2007 Quotehttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11100921/ Do you think that the amount the jury awarded is appropriate for the case? There is not enough information to tell whether it was or was not. It'd be nice to know the basis for the damages award. Were punitives involved? Etc? I mean, if he was awarded $40k in general damages, but $00k in punitives, then it would absolutely make sense. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #5 January 17, 2007 Anyone catch Boston Legal, last night? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #6 January 17, 2007 QuoteQuotehttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11100921/ Do you think that the amount the jury awarded is appropriate for the case? There is not enough information to tell whether it was or was not. It'd be nice to know the basis for the damages award. Were punitives involved? Etc? I mean, if he was awarded $40k in general damages, but $00k in punitives, then it would absolutely make sense. He was awarded $400K not $40K."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #7 January 17, 2007 I had a type-O. I meant to say, "$40k in general and $400k in punitives." Punitives are measured by the wealth of the Defendant, but must bear some reasonable relationship to the amount of general damages. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
