Andy9o8 3 #1 January 3, 2007 Yup, He's at it again. Never doubt that God has a sense of humor. Of course He does. Right now He's standing behind ol' Pat making 2-finger "bunny ears" behind his head. Poor ol' Pat. Hey wait a minute...Pat's getting rich as hell off this crap. .... Holy shit....the joke's on us... http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/02/robertson.predictions.ap/index.html *** Pat Robertson: God told me of 'mass killing' in 2007 VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia (AP) -- Evangelical broadcaster Pat Robertson said Tuesday that God has told him that a terrorist attack on the United States would cause a "mass killing" late in 2007. "I'm not necessarily saying it's going to be nuclear," he said during his news-and-talk television show "The 700 Club" on the Christian Broadcasting Network. "The Lord didn't say nuclear. But I do believe it will be something like that." Robertson said God told him about the impending tragedy during a recent prayer retreat. God also said, he claims, that major cities and possibly millions of people will be affected by the attack, which should take place sometime after September. *** Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflir29 0 #2 January 3, 2007 So does intel recieved from God fall into the Humint category or not? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #3 January 3, 2007 So, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #4 January 3, 2007 You just have to wait Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #5 January 3, 2007 If he is among the dead it might be worth it. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #6 January 3, 2007 I guess that high risk ventures can result in large prophets but you could loose out, whereas an index-linked prophet doesn't have the returns but is a safer long term bet? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #7 January 3, 2007 You don't need the wisper from God to know thats not bad odds.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #8 January 3, 2007 Has he ever actually predicted anything? Has he ever actually made a positive prediction? I predict that ... Pat Robertson will die and find out he was talking to the Devil and not God. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #9 January 3, 2007 Shouldnt we call this religious terrorism?Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #10 January 3, 2007 QuoteShouldnt we call this religious terrorism? He is making terroristical threats."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
labrys 0 #11 January 3, 2007 QuoteHas he ever actually predicted anything? Has he ever actually made a positive prediction? Yes, he predicted that the world would not end in 2006. I"m glad he got that one right.Owned by Remi #? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #12 January 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteHas he ever actually predicted anything? Has he ever actually made a positive prediction? Yes, he predicted that the world would not end in 2006. I"m glad he got that one right. Wow, that is both a postive and correct prediction. I stand corrected, he must be talking to God to make those kinds of predictions. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #13 January 3, 2007 QuoteSo, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? When a "prophet" is wrong, then he is no prophet. Oral was wrong and therefore, he is no prophet, hopefully Pat will be wrong and remove the "prophet" hat too. Deut 18:12 steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #14 January 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteSo, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? When a "prophet" is wrong, then he is no prophet. Oral was wrong and therefore, he is no prophet, hopefully Pat will be wrong and remove the "prophet" hat too. Deut 18:12 __________________________________ Funny, you mentioned Oral! When he holed-up in that tower and said that 'if', he didn't get a million bucks... he'd die! Well, he didn't die. If, he and Pat are such 'prophets' and 'seers'... why, don't they win the lottery? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #15 January 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteSo, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? When a "prophet" is wrong, then he is no prophet. Oral was wrong and therefore, he is no prophet, hopefully Pat will be wrong and remove the "prophet" hat too. Deut 18:12 __________________________________ Funny, you mentioned Oral! When he holed-up in that tower and said that 'if', he didn't get a million bucks... he'd die! Well, he didn't die. If, he and Pat are such 'prophets' and 'seers'... why, don't they win the lottery? Chuck That's why I said Oral was proven to not be a prophet. Funny thing, the few prophets of the OT were not the type to live the high life as the modern day prophets do. I seriously doubt any of these modern day hucksters would want the job as prophet if we did to them what they did to "prophets" of old. From the Article: PAT: "I have a relatively good track record," he said. "Sometimes I miss." Obviously Pat needs to go back to Bible college. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #16 January 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteSo, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? When a "prophet" is wrong, then he is no prophet. Oral was wrong and therefore, he is no prophet, hopefully Pat will be wrong and remove the "prophet" hat too. Deut 18:12 How long do you have to wait before you can decide that the "prophet" was wrong and is no such thing? Jesus said he was coming back and that was 2000 years ago. I reckon it could be a long time before Pat Robertson gets his "official whackjob" hat (although the unofficial one suits him quite well) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #17 January 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteSo, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? When a "prophet" is wrong, then he is no prophet. Oral was wrong and therefore, he is no prophet, hopefully Pat will be wrong and remove the "prophet" hat too. Deut 18:12 How long do you have to wait before you can decide that the "prophet" was wrong and is no such thing? Jesus said he was coming back and that was 2000 years ago. I reckon it could be a long time before Pat Robertson gets his "oficial whackjob" hat. MOST prophets were speaking to their generation and therefore not too long. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #18 January 3, 2007 QuoteMOST prophets were speaking to their generation and therefore not too long. Jesus must get a special pass on account of his dad then? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #19 January 3, 2007 His prophecy of the over throw of Jerusalem was timely. He alsp said HE did not set the time for his return. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #20 January 3, 2007 So who does set the time? I mean he's an omnipotent God isn't he? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #21 January 3, 2007 QuoteSo who does set the time? I mean he's an omnipotent God isn't he? JC said only God the Father knew the time of the Son's return. If you want to debate the trinity - we'd better start a new thread and get ready for some loooong writings. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #22 January 3, 2007 Can his Lord even pronounce nuclear. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackC 0 #23 January 3, 2007 QuoteJC said only God the Father knew the time of the Son's return. If you want to debate the trinity - we'd better start a new thread and get ready for some loooong writings. I looked into that before but there's only so much gibberish I can take before I implode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #24 January 3, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteSo, how do you tell the difference between a prophet and a whackjob? When a "prophet" is wrong, then he is no prophet. Oral was wrong and therefore, he is no prophet, hopefully Pat will be wrong and remove the "prophet" hat too. Deut 18:12 __________________________________ Funny, you mentioned Oral! When he holed-up in that tower and said that 'if', he didn't get a million bucks... he'd die! Well, he didn't die. If, he and Pat are such 'prophets' and 'seers'... why, don't they win the lottery? Chuck That's why I said Oral was proven to not be a prophet. Funny thing, the few prophets of the OT were not the type to live the high life as the modern day prophets do. I seriously doubt any of these modern day hucksters would want the job as prophet if we did to them what they did to "prophets" of old. From the Article: PAT: "I have a relatively good track record," he said. "Sometimes I miss." Obviously Pat needs to go back to Bible college. __________________________________ You nailed that one! I don't think, any of them would want to be stoned to death for their actions. As for Pat... he needs to just go away. I think, Oral, already has. That phony, Al Sharpton (look at his track record) is another one who needs to go-away! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 35 #25 January 3, 2007 Quote You nailed that one! I don't think, any of them would want to be stoned to death for their actions. As for Pat... he needs to just go away. I think, Oral, already has. That phony, Al Sharpton (look at his track record) is another one who needs to go-away! AAAAAAAA-men! They're all whack jobs. "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
