0
kallend

Violent crime UP in USA

Recommended Posts

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.

I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Look at it state by state, and I'm sure you'll find that by far, the largest increases were in those liberal paradise that abridge the 2nd.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.

I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Look at it state by state, and I'm sure you'll find that by far, the largest increases were in those liberal paradise that abridge the 2nd.




Did you actually look, or just guessing?

I see homicides in Houston are way up.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.

I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Look at it state by state, and I'm sure you'll find that by far, the largest increases were in those liberal paradise that abridge the 2nd.




Did you actually look, or just guessing?



Why, yes...yes I did.

Quote

Even worse for Brady, violent crime trends are not spread equally across all states. RTC states (average Brady grade “D”) saw an aggregate 7.8% drop in violent crime, while non-RTC states (average Brady grade “B”) saw a 5.2% decrease. Even when Brady grades synchronize with violent crime trends, it fails to give an accurate picture: Brady dropped the national average grade from “C-” to “D+” in 2005, the same year that the violent crime rate increased 1.3%. This would seem to make sense, as a lower grade is supposed to reflect less safety for citizens. Unfortunately for Brady, most of that increase occurred in non-RTC states, which saw an aggregate increase of 2.8%, while RTC states increased 0.6%. Using Brady’s criteria of grading each state as an equivalent entity, non-RTC states averaged a 5.6% increase in violent crime, while RTC states averaged a 0.6% increase. Since 2001, the violent crime differential between RTC and non-RTC states increased from 26.0% to 27.5%, meaning that RTC states are becoming relatively more law-abiding compared to non-RTC states.



Quote

I see homicides in Houston are way up.



[snark]Yup.. last year, they had 52 less murders than Chicago, per the FBI stats ... this year, they had 1 more... I wonder what could have changed in Houston in the last year that could have contributed to crime stats...hmm?[/snark]
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.

I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Look at it state by state, and I'm sure you'll find that by far, the largest increases were in those liberal paradise that abridge the 2nd.




Did you actually look, or just guessing?

I see homicides in Houston are way up.



Houston isn't a state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.

I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Look at it state by state, and I'm sure you'll find that by far, the largest increases were in those liberal paradise that abridge the 2nd.




Did you actually look, or just guessing?

I see homicides in Houston are way up.



Houston isn't a state.



It's not broken down by state in the preliminary FBI stats. It's broken down by city. He claims to have read the report, so I'm surprised he didn't know that.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.

I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Look at it state by state, and I'm sure you'll find that by far, the largest increases were in those liberal paradise that abridge the 2nd.




Did you actually look, or just guessing?



Why, yes...yes I did.

Quote

Even worse for Brady, violent crime trends are not spread equally across all states. RTC states (average Brady grade “D”) saw an aggregate 7.8% drop in violent crime, while non-RTC states (average Brady grade “B”) saw a 5.2% decrease. Even when Brady grades synchronize with violent crime trends, it fails to give an accurate picture: Brady dropped the national average grade from “C-” to “D+” in 2005, the same year that the violent crime rate increased 1.3%. This would seem to make sense, as a lower grade is supposed to reflect less safety for citizens. Unfortunately for Brady, most of that increase occurred in non-RTC states, which saw an aggregate increase of 2.8%, while RTC states increased 0.6%. Using Brady’s criteria of grading each state as an equivalent entity, non-RTC states averaged a 5.6% increase in violent crime, while RTC states averaged a 0.6% increase. Since 2001, the violent crime differential between RTC and non-RTC states increased from 26.0% to 27.5%, meaning that RTC states are becoming relatively more law-abiding compared to non-RTC states.



Quote

I see homicides in Houston are way up.



[snark]Yup.. last year, they had 52 less murders than Chicago, per the FBI stats ... this year, they had 1 more... I wonder what could have changed in Houston in the last year that could have contributed to crime stats...hmm?[/snark]



Chicago is 40% bigger than Houston, the Houston homicide rate per 100,000 pop. is 40% greater than Chicago's. Houston's homicides went up 29% last year. Chicago's went down 4.3%.

Clearly you are tryng to foist the blame on Katrina, but (a) the stats are not for 2005:P, (b) even before Katrina, Houston's homicide rate was higher than Chicago's.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

According to the latest FBI report.
I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Are you concluding that CCW causes crime to go up?

If so, then please explain how crime had gone down every year for the last 12 years or so, to a low not seen since the 1960's, while CCW spread across the nation and is now the law in over 40 states.

And if not, then please explain why you commented about CCW in relation to this one-year upturn.

Are you going to claim that CCW had nothing to do with the crime drop over the previous 12 years, but now suddenly it is responsible for a one-year upturn?

Or are you just trying to confuse the gullible public again with incorrect attributions because you hate guns?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.
I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Are you concluding that CCW causes crime to go up?

If so, then please explain how crime had gone down every year for the last 12 years or so, to a low not seen since the 1960's, while CCW spread across the nation and is now the law in over 40 states.

And if not, then please explain why you commented about CCW in relation to this one-year upturn.

Are you going to claim that CCW had nothing to do with the crime drop over the previous 12 years, but now suddenly it is responsible for a one-year upturn?

Or are you just trying to confuse the gullible public again with incorrect attributions because you hate guns?



Someone on here :P once claimed that we should look at changes. Well, here are some changes. Houston UP, Chicago DOWN.

However, the real cause is no doubt the 55% CUT in the federal crime fighting budget and assistance to the states and cities under Bush.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Clearly you are tryng to foist the blame on Katrina, but (a) the stats are not for 2005:P, (b) even before Katrina, Houston's homicide rate was higher than Chicago's.



I assume you have seen Houston's population in person.

Kinda reminds me of Memphis and East St.Louis.



Yes I have.

Have you been to Cabrini Green?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Clearly you are tryng to foist the blame on Katrina, but (a) the stats are not for 2005:P, (b) even before Katrina, Houston's homicide rate was higher than Chicago's.



I assume you have seen Houston's population in person.

Kinda reminds me of Memphis and East St.Louis.



Yes I have.

Have you been to Cabrini Green?



Not since I gave up 'bangin.:P:D:D:D

I have been places far worse than that, I am sorry to have to admit it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.
I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Are you concluding that CCW causes crime to go up?

If so, then please explain how crime had gone down every year for the last 12 years or so, to a low not seen since the 1960's, while CCW spread across the nation and is now the law in over 40 states.

And if not, then please explain why you commented about CCW in relation to this one-year upturn.

Are you going to claim that CCW had nothing to do with the crime drop over the previous 12 years, but now suddenly it is responsible for a one-year upturn?

Or are you just trying to confuse the gullible public again with incorrect attributions because you hate guns?



Someone on here :P once claimed that we should look at changes. Well, here are some changes. Houston UP, Chicago DOWN.



Ahhh, the usual non-responsive response from kallend. I can see that you're still not interested in serious discussion - only in being evasive and spreading disinformation. You're failure to answer my questions is noted, along with your failure to provide any analysis of what you posted, and your failure to state any position on what the change means. Of course you have to ignore my questions, because the correct factual answers would destroy the false impressions you're trying to give people here. All the usual from you. Blah blah blah...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

According to the latest FBI report.
I thought CCW was supposed to bring violent crime down.



Are you concluding that CCW causes crime to go up?

If so, then please explain how crime had gone down every year for the last 12 years or so, to a low not seen since the 1960's, while CCW spread across the nation and is now the law in over 40 states.

And if not, then please explain why you commented about CCW in relation to this one-year upturn.

Are you going to claim that CCW had nothing to do with the crime drop over the previous 12 years, but now suddenly it is responsible for a one-year upturn?

Or are you just trying to confuse the gullible public again with incorrect attributions because you hate guns?



Someone on here :P once claimed that we should look at changes. Well, here are some changes. Houston UP, Chicago DOWN.



Ahhh, the usual non-responsive response from kallend. I can see that you're still not interested in serious discussion - only in being evasive and spreading disinformation. You're failure to answer my questions is noted, along with your failure to provide any analysis of what you posted, and your failure to state any position on what the change means. Of course you have to ignore my questions, because the correct factual answers would destroy the false impressions you're trying to give people here. All the usual from you. Blah blah blah...



I gave you my actual opinion and you cut it out of your reply and then accused me of not answering. You need to try harder than that.:P

However, the real cause is no doubt the 55% CUT in the federal crime fighting budget and assistance to the states and cities under Bush.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Violent crime down in Chicago eh? Well, I guess when they started moving the low income population out into shitty suburbs like Maywood it actually did something other than make way for new condos. "Chicago's low income suburbs, the new Australia!"
_________________________________________
"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Kierkegaard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Violent crime down in Chicago eh? Well, I guess when they started moving the low income population out into shitty suburbs like Maywood it actually did something other than make way for new condos. "Chicago's low income suburbs, the new Australia!"



Low income people have been moving to the suburbs for over 30 years. You need a new theory.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The sad part is the super libs dont understand what bringing concealed weapons licences does. It makes life a card game. The upstanding citizen has a bluff possible. Criminals know that concealed weapons licence are easily available to non felons. that way they have to think befire they attempt a physical crime. Does this guy have a weapon? can he shoot back? Now whre not, say Camden, NJ, the criminal knows you would not chance having a concealed weapon and doing automatic 5 years,,so,,he mugs you. I wish these super libs would get a life or get mugged so they could actually comprehend that.

EDIT: I almost forgot...its out of the question to add southwestern states in if crimes go up..they have a seroius illegal problem..all they have to do is go back across the border if they commit a violent crime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Chicago is 40% bigger than Houston, the Houston homicide rate per 100,000 pop. is 40% greater than Chicago's. Houston's homicides went up 29% last year. Chicago's went down 4.3%.

Clearly you are tryng to foist the blame on Katrina, but (a) the stats are not for 2005:P, (b) even before Katrina, Houston's homicide rate was higher than Chicago's.



Not "foisting" anything... but maybe you should have done a bit more research, yourself...

Quote

Influx of Katrina refugees tied to Houston crime rise

October 22, 2006

HOUSTON (AP) -- Refugees from Hurricane Katrina have contributed to an increase in Houston's annual homicide rate, which could climb this year to its highest level in more than a decade, police said.
Houston had 316 homicides as of Tuesday. That's a 25-percent increase from the 252 slayings tallied at this time last year, putting the city on pace to record nearly 400 killings before the end of this year.
"We recognize that the homicide rate is up as far as raw numbers and as well as percentages relative to the population," Capt. Dwayne Ready said. "We also recognize that Katrina evacuees continue to have an impact on the murder rate."
When Katrina swamped New Orleans last year, 250,000 persons fled to Houston. As many as 150,000 hurricane refugees remain in the city.
Houston's homicide rate has been much higher in the past, especially 1981, when the city was dubbed the nation's murder capital with 701 slayings. Even if the city reaches 400 homicides, Capt. Ready said, "it's not a bleak picture."
At least 65 slayings in 2006 have been classified as Katrina-related, meaning either the victim, suspect or both evacuated to Houston after Katrina. Police have not kept records of how refugees have affected crime rates other than homicide.
The murder rate began to rise at the end of last year, when the city recorded 334 homicides. During the previous decade, Houston never exceeded the 316 slayings counted in 1995.


Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good points and good ideas except for one thing. Super libs have guns in these areas, and if they do not they have someone with them that do carry guns. Rosie O'Donnall comes to mind as one example. The gun owners Californial friend Ms Feinstein is another great example of that same BS.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


At least 65 slayings in 2006 have been classified as Katrina-related, meaning either the victim, suspect or both evacuated to Houston after Katrina. Police have not kept records of how refugees have affected crime rates other than homicide.
.



So you count it as due to Katrina when only the VICTIM is evacuee? Well, OK, but it sounds like the "He made me do it" defense.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


At least 65 slayings in 2006 have been classified as Katrina-related, meaning either the victim, suspect or both evacuated to Houston after Katrina. Police have not kept records of how refugees have affected crime rates other than homicide.
.



So you count it as due to Katrina when only the VICTIM is evacuee? Well, OK, but it sounds like the "He made me do it" defense.



Sorta like when a criminal breaks into a house, huh?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


At least 65 slayings in 2006 have been classified as Katrina-related, meaning either the victim, suspect or both evacuated to Houston after Katrina. Police have not kept records of how refugees have affected crime rates other than homicide.
.



So you count it as due to Katrina when only the VICTIM is evacuee? Well, OK, but it sounds like the "He made me do it" defense.



Sorta like when a criminal breaks into a house, huh?



So when a visitor to any city is murdered, that should not be counted?

Why are all these Louisianans so dangerous anyway, don't they have CCW in Louisiana?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here goes Kallend again bragging about the very controversial decline of murders in Chicago. There has been much made of faulty reports and the accidental death classifications over the last few years in Chicago. Living in the Chicagoland area the last several years, I have heard many reports of Family members claiming there loved ones murder was classified as an accidental death.
For those outside the Chicagoland area check out this clip for a sample of what is really going on here.

http://cbs2chicago.com/video?id=27651@wbbm.dayport.com
That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0