JohnRich 4 #1 December 13, 2006 News:Democrats shopped Foley story to papers "Democratic campaign operatives pushed newspapers to write about then-Rep. Mark Foley's e-mails to teenage pages in the hope that a scandal would emerge before the midterm elections, according to a House ethics report. "The findings were bolstered when an aide to Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Illinois Democrat, said the congressman also knew about the e-mails, which were dubbed "inappropriate" by the ethics panel. Mr. Emanuel, who was chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee when Mr. Foley's sex scandal broke in late September, had denied knowledge of the Florida Republican's e-mails..."Source: Washington Times Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #2 December 13, 2006 Personally, I see nothing wrong with getting the news out about inappropriate conduct of elected representatives. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #3 December 13, 2006 I think the stink is that Emanuel heard about these e-mails back '05. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #4 December 13, 2006 So JR...... Please tell us..... since you are the watchdog of all that is good and right and holy in watching those evil democrats in WA..........how many negative stories did your party shop to the press before the election??? Personally I want to see ANYONE who engages in that sort of activity.... for the information to come out... so people can make up their own minds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #5 December 13, 2006 QuotePersonally, I see nothing wrong with getting the news out about inappropriate conduct of elected representatives. Yep. The Republicans did the same thing with Clinton's BJ. (actually I think it WAS the Washington Times that broke the story in January 1998) Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #6 December 13, 2006 so finding out about this in June and waiting untill a time of what was to be major impact at election time is ethical? as one Dem Senator did and then lied about knowing about it...."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #7 December 13, 2006 Quoteso finding out about this in June and waiting untill a time of what was to be major impact at election time is ethical? as one Dem Senator did and then lied about knowing about it.... Quite right! The Dem leadership's claim that they were concerned about the kids was pure bullshit. They were concerned about using it at the time that would be best for them politically.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #8 December 13, 2006 Hello Pot and Kettle.... THis must have been on Lush Rimjobs show today Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #9 December 13, 2006 So what? This is war. Not to use all the arrows in one's quiver is idiotic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #10 December 14, 2006 QuoteHello Pot and Kettle.... Nobody lives here by that name, you must have the wrong number. QuoteTHis must have been on Lush Rimjobs show today I didn't listen to Rush today, but he likely did talk about it, it is a fine example of the lies and hypocrisy of the Dem leadership. The Dems supposed concern for the minor pages is simply false. They wanted to use the issue at the most politically advantageous time. Can you admit that?People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #11 December 14, 2006 QuoteQuotePersonally, I see nothing wrong with getting the news out about inappropriate conduct of elected representatives. Yep. The Republicans did the same thing with Clinton's BJ. (actually I think it WAS the Washington Times that broke the story in January 1998) I thought it was Drudge. I don't remember though.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #12 December 14, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuotePersonally, I see nothing wrong with getting the news out about inappropriate conduct of elected representatives. Yep. The Republicans did the same thing with Clinton's BJ. (actually I think it WAS the Washington Times that broke the story in January 1998) I thought it was Drudge. I don't remember though. The BJ comment is meant to mislead and re-direct anyway. The Clinton lovers would like his problems to be about a BJ but they (most of them anyway) know better.........."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #13 December 14, 2006 I thought it was the National Enquirer that broke the stain on the dress story. Yes, Clinton did get a BJ from an intern (like a teacher/student relationship, or congressman/page relationship - usually that is not considered acceptable). He also had credible evidence accusing him of being a rapist, sexual imposition & harassment, making advances to a woman on the day of her husband's death, having the Arkansas state police help him cheat on his wife...People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #14 December 14, 2006 >He also had credible evidence accusing him of being a rapist, sexual > imposition & harassment, making advances to a woman on the day > of her husband's death, having the Arkansas state police help him > cheat on his wife... Right. There's also credible evidence we never landed on the Moon, that Bush ordered 9/11, and that the Mayans were a civilization from outer space. Do a Google search; there's plenty of evidence for all of that no one has refuted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #15 December 14, 2006 Quote>He also had credible evidence accusing him of being a rapist, sexual > imposition & harassment, making advances to a woman on the day > of her husband's death, having the Arkansas state police help him > cheat on his wife... Right. There's also credible evidence we never landed on the Moon, that Bush ordered 9/11, and that the Mayans were a civilization from outer space. Do a Google search; there's plenty of evidence for all of that no one has refuted. There is evidence of such things as you mention, but I assert it is not credible. You get 0 debate points from the William Buckley scoring committee for that response. Really lousy analogy. People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #16 December 14, 2006 Of course, if Foley, senior member of God's Own Pedophiles and self-appointed guardian of young people, had just behaved correctly there would be nothing to tell to the media. I guess the Dem took a lesson from Karl Rove's book.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #17 December 14, 2006 Of course, if the Dem leadership had not held on to the story, but had tried to make political points out of it right away, then they wouldn't be a story of hypocrisy to tell the media.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #18 December 14, 2006 QuoteOf course, if Foley, senior member of God's Own Pedophiles and self-appointed guardian of young people, had just behaved correctly there would be nothing to tell to the media. I guess the Dem took a lesson from Karl Rove's book. Ironically I know of a member here, that would consider the minor to have "tasted heaven's delight" with this type of conduct. Isn't this sad?"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #19 December 14, 2006 >Really lousy analogy. Clinton was one of the most hated politicians ever. If there was even a shred of real credible evidence for rape he would have been indicted and convicted. There wasn't, thus putting such accusations in the category of faked moon landings and Bush drunken oval office binges. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #20 December 14, 2006 QuoteOf course, if the Dem leadership had not held on to the story, but had tried to make political points out of it right away, then they wouldn't be a story of hypocrisy to tell the media. Coming from a supporter of the party of Karl Rove, that is really funny. Politicians do what politicians do. Foley did what creeps and pedophiles do.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #21 December 14, 2006 QuoteQuoteOf course, if the Dem leadership had not held on to the story, but had tried to make political points out of it right away, then they wouldn't be a story of hypocrisy to tell the media. Coming from a supporter of the party of Karl Rove, that is really funny. Politicians do what politicians do. Foley did what creeps and pedophiles do. Wow... sending erotic emails to people above the age of consent is pedophilia, now? What are they calling what Studds did, then?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #22 December 14, 2006 Quote>Really lousy analogy. Clinton was one of the most hated politicians ever. Quote You really are not serious here are you? Had he been the most hated the senate would have done thier job and removed him from office for the felony he commited (and admitted) too. What a dam joke. But if you are right I woudl have heard him called Hitler, ignorant, stuipid and on and on and on. You really need to be less sheltered..........."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #23 December 14, 2006 Quote>He also had credible evidence accusing him of being a rapist, sexual > imposition & harassment, making advances to a woman on the day > of her husband's death, having the Arkansas state police help him > cheat on his wife... Right. There's also credible evidence we never landed on the Moon, that Bush ordered 9/11, and that the Mayans were a civilization from outer space. Do a Google search; there's plenty of evidence for all of that no one has refuted. The operative word here is "credible"... which doesn't apply to any of your examples, but overwhelming does apply to the claims of Clinton a sexual predator. Your analogy is the poorest I've seen in a while. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #24 December 14, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOf course, if the Dem leadership had not held on to the story, but had tried to make political points out of it right away, then they wouldn't be a story of hypocrisy to tell the media. Coming from a supporter of the party of Karl Rove, that is really funny. Politicians do what politicians do. Foley did what creeps and pedophiles do. Wow... sending erotic emails to people above the age of consent is pedophilia, now? What are they calling what Studds did, then? A couple of months ago you neo-cons were falling all over yourselves trying to get distance from Foley. Now he did nothing wrong? Please explain.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites idrankwhat 0 #25 December 14, 2006 QuoteNews:Democrats shopped Foley story to papers "Democratic campaign operatives pushed newspapers to write about then-Rep. Mark Foley's e-mails to teenage pages in the hope that a scandal would emerge before the midterm elections, according to a House ethics report. "The findings were bolstered when an aide to Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Illinois Democrat, said the congressman also knew about the e-mails, which were dubbed "inappropriate" by the ethics panel. Mr. Emanuel, who was chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee when Mr. Foley's sex scandal broke in late September, had denied knowledge of the Florida Republican's e-mails..."Source: Washington Times I can't look it up right now but I believe there was a story that named the REPUBLICAN who originally shopped the story. Regardless of who put it out there, it needed to be put out there and who gives a shit if it hurt the R's in the election. They deserved it for ignoring it in the first place AND they proved a few days ago, when the released the house ethics report that they still don't know a thing about integrity. $0.02 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
NCclimber 0 #23 December 14, 2006 Quote>He also had credible evidence accusing him of being a rapist, sexual > imposition & harassment, making advances to a woman on the day > of her husband's death, having the Arkansas state police help him > cheat on his wife... Right. There's also credible evidence we never landed on the Moon, that Bush ordered 9/11, and that the Mayans were a civilization from outer space. Do a Google search; there's plenty of evidence for all of that no one has refuted. The operative word here is "credible"... which doesn't apply to any of your examples, but overwhelming does apply to the claims of Clinton a sexual predator. Your analogy is the poorest I've seen in a while. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #24 December 14, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOf course, if the Dem leadership had not held on to the story, but had tried to make political points out of it right away, then they wouldn't be a story of hypocrisy to tell the media. Coming from a supporter of the party of Karl Rove, that is really funny. Politicians do what politicians do. Foley did what creeps and pedophiles do. Wow... sending erotic emails to people above the age of consent is pedophilia, now? What are they calling what Studds did, then? A couple of months ago you neo-cons were falling all over yourselves trying to get distance from Foley. Now he did nothing wrong? Please explain.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #25 December 14, 2006 QuoteNews:Democrats shopped Foley story to papers "Democratic campaign operatives pushed newspapers to write about then-Rep. Mark Foley's e-mails to teenage pages in the hope that a scandal would emerge before the midterm elections, according to a House ethics report. "The findings were bolstered when an aide to Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Illinois Democrat, said the congressman also knew about the e-mails, which were dubbed "inappropriate" by the ethics panel. Mr. Emanuel, who was chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee when Mr. Foley's sex scandal broke in late September, had denied knowledge of the Florida Republican's e-mails..."Source: Washington Times I can't look it up right now but I believe there was a story that named the REPUBLICAN who originally shopped the story. Regardless of who put it out there, it needed to be put out there and who gives a shit if it hurt the R's in the election. They deserved it for ignoring it in the first place AND they proved a few days ago, when the released the house ethics report that they still don't know a thing about integrity. $0.02 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites