RkyMtnHigh 0 #1 December 12, 2006 Is this really a reality? She has more support than I realized Discuss. _________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #2 December 12, 2006 Gee after setting the bar so low over the last 6 years.. it would be very easy for her to do better than this incompetent lying fool. Hell I would vote for ANYONE other than GW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #3 December 12, 2006 QuoteIs this really a reality? She has more support than I realized Discuss. Just wait 'til Obama gets going.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #4 December 12, 2006 She's the closest thing we've had to a decent president in the past 25 years. Might as well let her have her old job back. Oh, c'mon. Everyone knows Hillary wore the pants when Clinton was in office. Bill had pants; he just didn't like wearing them. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #5 December 12, 2006 QuoteOh, c'mon. Everyone knows Hillary wore the pants when Clinton was in office. Bill had pants; he just didn't like wearing them. BULLSHIT.... he just wore them around his ankles alot. Which I still think is a hell of a lot better than the idiot taking the country to war based on GOD telling him to outdo his Daddy, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gene03 0 #6 December 12, 2006 QuoteQuoteOh, c'mon. Everyone knows Hillary wore the pants when Clinton was in office. Bill had pants; he just didn't like wearing them. BULLSHIT.... he just wore them around his ankles alot. Which I still think is a hell of a lot better than the idiot taking the country to war based on GOD telling him to outdo his Daddy, Damn woman, you come up with the most accurate perspective and insight. I don't trust Hillary after finding out in her Dewer's Profile that see considers "1984" to be the most influential book in her life.“The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. Stanislaw Jerzy Lec quotes (Polish writer, poet and satirist 1906-1966) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RkyMtnHigh 0 #7 December 12, 2006 Prove to me how Hillary or anyone for that matter has the credentials to run this country in an efficient or effective manner. I have history a history with government officials back in Colorado which make me totally disagree with the system as a whole...lobbyists, bills, and how decisions are made....all of it makes me sick to my stomach. After what I've seen first hand..makes me realize it's about $$$$$ and that my vote doesn't count. _________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #8 December 12, 2006 Sure GW sucks. But it coulda been worse....Gore or Kerry could have won. Or Hillary (God forbid). But seriously, two points to consider in any presidential race... 1: Anybody intelligent enough to actually be a good president is smart enough to stay the hell away from politics, and... 2: Why would anyone vote for someone who is so arrogant to think they are the best person out of 300 million to lead this country ??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #9 December 12, 2006 QuoteProve to me how Hillary or anyone for that matter has the credentials to run this country in an efficient or effective manner. I have history a history with government officials back in Colorado which make me totally disagree with the system as a whole...lobbyists, bills, and how decisions are made....all of it makes me sick to my stomach. After what I've seen first hand..makes me realize it's about $$$$$ and that my vote doesn't count. How can we prove that anyone has the qualifications to run this country? The best and the brightest just don't run. So the next election will turn out just like 2004, where we have to choose between two power hungry bottom feeders who serve primarily as bad examples. I agree with Wendy's post from a few days ago saying billvon should run (I think she made the post in jest.). He's a +3*sigma type of guy. Plus, a non career politician would be a refreshing change in the Whitehouse. I think we would have a very difficult time convincing billvon that it is a good idea, however. I can't really blame anyone for not wanting to campaign for president.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #10 December 12, 2006 QuoteIs this really a reality? She has more support than I realized Discuss. Please put this idea out of your head. I realize that there are a large number of people, mostly Republican, that would LOVE to see her as the nominee; mostly because she is UNELECTABLE. She would have a great chance of winning the nomination, but I will go on record right this minute as saying that she is UNELECTABLE and therefore is the worst possible choice in my mind.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RkyMtnHigh 0 #11 December 12, 2006 But Quade....look at our options ...pullllllllease _________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #12 December 12, 2006 QuoteSure GW sucks. But it coulda been worse....Gore or Kerry could have won. Or Hillary (God forbid). But seriously, two points to consider in any presidential race... 1: Anybody intelligent enough to actually be a good president is smart enough to stay the hell away from politics, and... 2: Why would anyone vote for someone who is so arrogant to think they are the best person out of 300 million to lead this country ??? You are the result of sperm that won a race against 300 million others. Does that make you arrogant?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #13 December 12, 2006 at this point I'd vote even vote for a Republican, so long as s/he wasn't a Neo-Con. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #14 December 12, 2006 QuoteBut Quade....look at our options ...pullllllllease I -am- looking at the current options. Currently I see a couple of Democrats I like that are electable, but Hillary simply isn't on the list. Gore - no. Vilsack - who? Kerry - no. Dean - no. Hillary - no. Obama - V.P. yes, Pres. no. Kucinich - no. Edwards - yes, actually. Would be very interesting with Obama as V.P. Somebodyelse - probably.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #15 December 12, 2006 >Gore - no. I would have agreed six monts ago, but he's changed a _lot_ since his last run in 2000, mostly for the better. I think he'd be a serious contender. Heck, he's shown he can win on the numbers, and that was back when he seemed to be made of wood. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AdD 1 #16 December 12, 2006 Ron Paul for president!!!Life is ez On the dz Every jumper's dream 3 rigs and an airstream Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GQ_jumper 4 #17 December 12, 2006 Just a personal opinion as to what I think is going to make the winning candidate in the next election, as we've seen over the past 6 years being far to the right isn't always the best course of action, when GW was elected I was far to the right on most issues, and looking back I think back then a lot of those on the far right made some fairly sound decisions. Nowadays I still would not consider myself a liberal, I am definitely more moderate than I was though, most of this being driven by the fact that those on the right won't listen to anyone but themselves, the reason I didn't swing all the way to the other side though(I just know someone is gonna turn this one into a gay joke), is beecause those on the left do the same thing, they listen to no one but themselves. Bush has turned the country off to someone on the far right, even if the next republican candidate were someone who was fairly outspoken in support of conservative views yet at the same time made an effort to understand both sides before making a sound decision he/she would stand no chance. And Kerry, good o'l mr. I'm better than everyone, especially soldiers and the lower-class, has turned the public off to those on the far left. I hear so many people saying they didn't want to vote for Bush but they did anyways just to avoid Kerry being in office. IMO Kerry based his strategy on being as far opposite GW as possible, the public showed a lack of support for Bush so it could be assumed that they would want to see just the opposite, and we all saw how that one worked out. Personally I feel that there are going to be more swing voters in this upcoming election than ever before, fewer people are going to head to the booth and just go down the line and check all the candidates in their party. Regardless of party affiliation I think the majority of Americans are going to look to someone who has their head on straight whether they lean to the left, right, or balance it all right in the middle There are people on both sides of the fence I consider to be excellent decision makers, party affiliation means little to nothing in my mind anymore, one's ability to see both sides of the argument and make a logical decision is what is going to get the support in the '08 election. Hillary, I'm sorry but she is a bit too much on the extreme side for my taste, and I will venture to say quite a few Americans feel the same way, including many registered democrats. The bad thing is that I think Hillary is tricky enough to read this and will put on a front that displays her as more of a moderate and then show her true colors after the voting booths have closed. Hopefully someone who tries to stay in the middle yet still has the ability to move one way or the other if the situation dictates will present themselves. I'm keeping my fingers-crossed anyways.History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #18 December 12, 2006 Quote>Gore - no. I would have agreed six monts ago, but he's changed a _lot_ since his last run in 2000, mostly for the better. I think he'd be a serious contender. Heck, he's shown he can win on the numbers, and that was back when he seemed to be made of wood. Hasn't he become more of a Jerry Brown candidate? More interesting to listen to on TV, but perhaps not someone you want to invite to dinner. I don't see his recent movie promoting votes in the GOP electorate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #19 December 12, 2006 Quote I don't trust Hillary after finding out in her Dewer's Profile that see considers "1984" to be the most influential book in her life. Why? You presume she sees it as a model utopia, rather than a warning about the line of going to far in having the goverment try to help people live better lives? (Something both parties need to be thinking about). In any event, better than book than Curious George. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GQ_jumper 4 #20 December 12, 2006 In any event, better than book than Curious George. Quote I don't know about that one, that silly little monkey got out of some pretty sticky situations, I'd bet we could learn a thing or two from him. silly monkey.History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #21 December 12, 2006 QuoteQuote I don't trust Hillary after finding out in her Dewer's Profile that see considers "1984" to be the most influential book in her life. Why? You presume she sees it as a model utopia, rather than a warning about the line of going to far in having the goverment try to help people live better lives? (Something both parties need to be thinking about). In any event, better than book than Curious George. Hillarycare and "it takes a village".... tell me she doesn't take the book that way....Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites happythoughts 0 #22 December 12, 2006 Hillary's value is similar to that of Ted Kennedy. 1- She is a valuable revenue collector. 2- She can sit in the background and be a lightning rod for criticism. Pulling it away from the candidate. 3- She can fling mud without being the return target, thus avoiding the label of negative-campaigner because she isn't running. She is more valuable as a support role than a runner. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #23 December 12, 2006 Quote>Gore - no. I would have agreed six monts ago, but he's changed a _lot_ since his last run in 2000, mostly for the better. I think he'd be a serious contender. Heck, he's shown he can win on the numbers, and that was back when he seemed to be made of wood. Don't get me wrong, I really like the guy and agree with a lot of what he has to say, but anyone that closely associated with the Clinton Administration is, in my opinion, just not going to be electable. Doesn't matter if they weren't even involved in any of the "scandal", it's just not gonna happen.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites sweetmoose 0 #24 December 12, 2006 I want arnold to run for president, too bad he can't since he's not a natural born citizen, boo!!We die only once, but for such a very long time. I'll believe in ghosts when I catch one in my teeth. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Cudlo 0 #25 December 12, 2006 Some Bush impersonator was asked if he thought Hillary had a chance, he said "Oh gee, no way. If the country has learned one thing, its that it isn't a good idea to elect a relative of a former president."_________________________________________ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Kierkegaard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
mnealtx 0 #21 December 12, 2006 QuoteQuote I don't trust Hillary after finding out in her Dewer's Profile that see considers "1984" to be the most influential book in her life. Why? You presume she sees it as a model utopia, rather than a warning about the line of going to far in having the goverment try to help people live better lives? (Something both parties need to be thinking about). In any event, better than book than Curious George. Hillarycare and "it takes a village".... tell me she doesn't take the book that way....Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
happythoughts 0 #22 December 12, 2006 Hillary's value is similar to that of Ted Kennedy. 1- She is a valuable revenue collector. 2- She can sit in the background and be a lightning rod for criticism. Pulling it away from the candidate. 3- She can fling mud without being the return target, thus avoiding the label of negative-campaigner because she isn't running. She is more valuable as a support role than a runner. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #23 December 12, 2006 Quote>Gore - no. I would have agreed six monts ago, but he's changed a _lot_ since his last run in 2000, mostly for the better. I think he'd be a serious contender. Heck, he's shown he can win on the numbers, and that was back when he seemed to be made of wood. Don't get me wrong, I really like the guy and agree with a lot of what he has to say, but anyone that closely associated with the Clinton Administration is, in my opinion, just not going to be electable. Doesn't matter if they weren't even involved in any of the "scandal", it's just not gonna happen.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sweetmoose 0 #24 December 12, 2006 I want arnold to run for president, too bad he can't since he's not a natural born citizen, boo!!We die only once, but for such a very long time. I'll believe in ghosts when I catch one in my teeth. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cudlo 0 #25 December 12, 2006 Some Bush impersonator was asked if he thought Hillary had a chance, he said "Oh gee, no way. If the country has learned one thing, its that it isn't a good idea to elect a relative of a former president."_________________________________________ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Kierkegaard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
