>You cannot directly attack and annihilate 100,000 civillians and justify
> taking the moral high ground. I am not saying it was not a justifiable
>decision, merely that it wasn't an honourable one
Well put. Trying to justify the use of nuclear weapons against civilians during a war by using a moral argument is absurd. War is the most immoral thing we have invented to date. Winning is the only "moral value" in war, a sad fact that's been proved over and over again.
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
> taking the moral high ground. I am not saying it was not a justifiable
>decision, merely that it wasn't an honourable one
Well put. Trying to justify the use of nuclear weapons against civilians during a war by using a moral argument is absurd. War is the most immoral thing we have invented to date. Winning is the only "moral value" in war, a sad fact that's been proved over and over again.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites