jcd11235 0 #51 November 15, 2006 Quoteyea instead slick willie sold them the missle tech. so they could actually hit what their aiming atThere should be a rule against referring to Clinton as Slick Willie unless Monica is mentioned in the same sentence. I think it's fair to say she rendered all other meanings behind the nickname relatively, um, irrelevant.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #52 November 15, 2006 Did you hear Clinton got a blowjob?We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 7 #53 November 15, 2006 QuoteDid you hear Clinton got a blowjob? NO!? Do Tell1 ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,589 #54 November 15, 2006 QuoteDid you hear Clinton got a blowjob?It never happened if there's no video. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #55 November 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteDid you hear Clinton got a blowjob?It never happened if there's no video. Indeed, but you know if that if any of that transpired anywhere in the Oval Office, there video. You better believe it... So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #56 November 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteIt never happened if there's no video. Wendy W. I guess most of the babies born last year were virgin births, then.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #57 November 16, 2006 Quote>yea instead slick willie sold them the missle tech . . . At least he got some money for it! We recently gave away the plans (in Arabic) for implosion-based nuclear weapons. That would be the same weapons that the inspectors said he was nowhere near building, correct? Not to mention the same information that's already been on the internet since the mid 90's. Seems if it was so critical that the information NOT be out there, that the other site would have been shut down...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest #58 November 16, 2006 From the Strategy Page: Chinese Boat Gets Real Close to U.S. Carrier November 14, 2006: The U.S. Navy is being tight lipped about reports that, on October 26th, a Chinese Song class submarine got within missile range (8 kilometers) of the U.S. carrier Kitty Hawk. The Chinese sub was spotted when it surfaced. The American carrier is supposed to be protected from this sort of thing by anti-submarine helicopters, and an SSN (nuclear attack submarine.) The Song class boats are the most modern diesel-electric subs in Chinese service. Displacing about 2,000 tons on the surface, the 246 foot long, Songs carry anti-ship missiles and torpedoes. The first Song entered service nine years ago. The boats can be very quiet when moving underwater, even though the Chinese have not yet mastered the most recent silencing techniques. Similar Australian subs have frequently gotten within attack range of American carriers. So have diesel-electric boats from other nations. While the Chinese have a reputation for poorly trained crews, the sixty sailors on the Song boats may be the new exception. Chinese subs have been seen at sea much more frequently over the past few years. That kind of experience, and an American carrier group that had never known Chinese subs to operate that far out on the high seas, may have become lax enough to let it happen."The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #59 November 16, 2006 QuoteQuote>yea instead slick willie sold them the missle tech . . . At least he got some money for it! We recently gave away the plans (in Arabic) for implosion-based nuclear weapons. That would be the same weapons that the inspectors said he was nowhere near building, correct? Not to mention the same information that's already been on the internet since the mid 90's. So you keep claiming with no proof presented. Quote Seems if it was so critical that the information NOT be out there, that the other site would have been shut down... So why did the govt. shut down THIS site?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #60 November 16, 2006 QuoteQuote That would be the same weapons that the inspectors said he was nowhere near building, correct? Not to mention the same information that's already been on the internet since the mid 90's. So you keep claiming with no proof presented. It's really not hard to find the information out there... Google IS your friend. QuoteQuote]Seems if it was so critical that the information NOT be out there, that the other site would have been shut down... So why did the govt. shut down THIS site? Because it's a site they control and not a site in Austrailia, perhaps?? Here's another couple things to think on - 1. If those plans were part of the ~40% of the recovered documents that were considered safe to post, what's in the other ~60%?? 2. If these papers are such a threat, then the papers, coupled with the fact that Saddam had called meeting with his nuclear board shortly before the invasion, make a strong case that he was still developing WMDs. Statements by one of his chief scientists indicated that Iraq could have had a working bomb within 12-18 months. 3. If these papers are true, then it's likely that the other papers translated, that speak of Iraq's meetings with AQ, Hamas and Hezbollah, make a strong case that Saddam was harboring and abetting terrorism.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #61 November 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteDid you hear Clinton got a blowjob?It never happened if there's no video.. that is NOT a visual you want to give people (retching) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azdiver 0 #62 November 21, 2006 saddam said in a public address that he would pay 25000 to the familys of suicide bombers against isreal, it was also know that he was taking care of some of the injured leaders of aqlight travels faster than sound, that's why some people appear to be bright until you hear them speak Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
