0
JohnRich

College Students Ban "Pledge of Allegiance"

Recommended Posts

News:
Students at Calif. College ban Pledge of Allegiance

Student leaders at Orange Coast college have touched off a furor by banning the Pledge of Allegiance at their meetings, saying they see no reason to publicly swear loyalty to God and the U.S. government...

The move was lead by three recently elected student trustees, who ran for office wearing revolutionary-style berets and said they do not believe in publicly swearing an oath to the American flag and government at their school...

"Loyalty ought to be something the government earns through performance, not through reciting a pledge," he said...
Source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me, it's a matter of "how you view it". If it's viewed as a loyalty oath (which I suppose at face value it appears to be), then I don't think it should be required. I'm a citizen; my loyalty is presumed, and I don't have to publicly affirm it to make other people comfortable. On the other hand, if you view it more as the equivalent of the national anthem at the beginning of a ballgame (which I think is the healthy way to look at it), then I don't have a real problem with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excuse a Brit butting in here.. But, saying something, anything without believing or meaning it makes it worthless.

There are folks around here that 'Under God' means something but for others, it's just words.

Standing and 'apparently showing respect for a couple of minutes, if not carried out for the other 23 hours and 58 minutes of each and every day, is meaningless.

How we live our lives demonstrates the respect or lack of for our country and fellow citizens - that is the try measue of a [wo]man. IMHO.

PAX

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How we live our lives demonstrates the respect or lack of for our country and fellow citizens - that is the try measue of a man.



And kids that are free and prosperous enough to be enjoying a college education certainly ought to respect the nation that allows them to achieve that, and just recite the Pledge. They can insert a brief silent pause during the "under god" part if they wish.

Re: "Loyalty ought to be something the government earns through performance, not through reciting a pledge"...

The fact that they are where they are, should be enough evidence that the country already deserves their respect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

How we live our lives demonstrates the respect or lack of for our country and fellow citizens - that is the try measue of a man.



And kids that are free and prosperous enough to be enjoying a college education certainly ought to respect the nation that allows them to achieve that, and just recite the Pledge. They can insert a brief silent pause during the "under god" part if they wish.

Re: "Loyalty ought to be something the government earns through performance, not through reciting a pledge"...

The fact that they are where they are, should be enough evidence that the country already deserves their respect.



You can't mandate respect, and if anyone doesn't have that respect then making them recite a "pledge" won't create it.

I think the onus is on those who want to mandate the pledge to make their case, rather than the reverse.

And why pick on colleges for a mandatory pledge? Why not dropzones? Or Wal-Marts?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Excuse a Brit butting in here.. But, saying something, anything without believing or meaning it makes it worthless.

There are folks around here that 'Under God' means something but for others, it's just words.

Standing and 'apparently showing respect for a couple of minutes, if not carried out for the other 23 hours and 58 minutes of each and every day, is meaningless.

How we live our lives demonstrates the respect or lack of for our country and fellow citizens - that is the try measue of a [wo]man. IMHO.

PAX



Quote

But, saying something, anything without believing or meaning it makes it worthless.



Totally, it s/b the chant of allegiance.

Quote

Standing and 'apparently showing respect for a couple of minutes, if not carried out for the other 23 hours and 58 minutes of each and every day, is meaningless.



Especially when it's compulsory. Hell, do the kids even know what it means? I laughed about the swearing in of the Constitution upholding after I got out of the service. Here are the points:

1) How can you swear to uphold something that you are giving concessions on as you swear to it?

2) How can you swear to uphold something you probably have zero knowledge about? Even criminal defendants are required to understand the charges aginst them, but military enlistees chant this crap for which they have no knowledge? I realize it's as procedural as it gets, but let's have a little reality here.

______________

So for teh kids to swear to the pledge is BS and shouldn't be practiced, as any dissenters / people who don't volunteer to participate, might be viewed as hostile by the teacher and down-graded for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
student leaders at a community college seems to be slightly on the ironic side. We're talking about a commuter school with absolutely no sense of unity.

The only interesting part is it's located in the GOP stronghold of Orange County. When I lived there, my vote was largely irrelevent, and now that I live in SF, the same is true on the other side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I always felt that I was pledging loyalty to my country - not the government. Under God was open for anyones belief - regardless of denomination.

It is about unity - not segregation......
_________________________________________
Twin Otter N203-Echo,29 July 2006
Cessna P206 N2537X, 19 April 2008
Blue Skies Forever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder if anyone has ever heard Red Buttons explaining the Pledge of Allegiance.

Maybe some of you should and it will shed more light on it's true meaning.

I wonder how many are willing to listen even though they believe the POA is a crock of shit.

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.

College students are Adults not children and if their reading comprehension is that poor maybe they should just quit school and become a politician.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I wonder if anyone has ever heard Red Buttons explaining the Pledge of Allegiance.

Maybe some of you should and it will shed more light on it's true meaning.

I wonder how many are willing to listen even though they believe the POA is a crock of shit.

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.

College students are Adults not children and if their reading comprehension is that poor maybe they should just quit school and become a politician.



It's about being compulsory that makes it crap, not the pledge itself. See, if you just volunteer to recite it, well, if you don't volunteer you will be penalized, but after that it's all voluntary. And for those of you who don't volunteer, well, you're just a bunch of commie liberal, anti-US haters; the rest of us are real Americans forget about all that, 'US based on revolution and dissent crap, that was so 1700 / 1800's.

Quote

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.



Please. The liberal side is about progressiveness. If you're liberal and people want to be gay, fine. If they weant to be striaght, fine. IF they want to call themselves John Smith or Moon Unit, fine. If you want to change the junk between your legs, fine.

OTOH, conservatives have this strict doctrine where things have an order and to fall outside of that order is IMPERMISSABLE. Boys are boys and girls are girls. There are boy jobs and girl jobs; don't cross-over. Jesus is our savior and all other religions are of teh devil.... I could go on, but you get it? How much wiggle room do teh consrvs have? Little to none.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.



Please. The liberal side is about progressiveness. If you're liberal and people want to be gay, fine. If they weant to be striaght, fine. IF they want to call themselves John Smith or Moon Unit, fine. If you want to change the junk between your legs, fine.

OTOH, conservatives have this strict doctrine where things have an order and to fall outside of that order is IMPERMISSABLE. Boys are boys and girls are girls. There are boy jobs and girl jobs; don't cross-over. Jesus is our savior and all other religions are of teh devil.... I could go on, but you get it? How much wiggle room do teh consrvs have? Little to none.



Do you know for a fact ALL CONSERVATIVES do not agree that we should all live and let live and that EVERYONE should be free to do as they like unless it violates Natural or Common Law?

I think you're confusing self professed Religous Zealots with those who conservatives.

Don't paint everyone with such a broad paintbrush.

Even true believers in Christianity are lumped together with those who use their own predjudices to put others down.

That is not fair at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I wonder if anyone has ever heard Red Buttons explaining the Pledge of Allegiance.

Maybe some of you should and it will shed more light on it's true meaning.

I wonder how many are willing to listen even though they believe the POA is a crock of shit.

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.

College students are Adults not children and if their reading comprehension is that poor maybe they should just quit school and become a politician.



Can you explain why the POA should be required at a college student government meeting, but not at, say, a DZ staff meeting, or when your local grocery store opens each morning?

And why do Red Button's views carry any more weight than anyone else's?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

unless it violates Natural or Common Law?



And what is Natural or Common Law? Who decides what it is?



Maybe it would be helpful to read up on that before you make up your mind, or argue against a statement, if you should choose to do so..

There is a wonderful search engine call google that might be helpful to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please. The liberal side is about progressiveness. If you're liberal and people want to be gay, fine. If they weant to be striaght, fine. IF they want to call themselves John Smith or Moon Unit, fine. If you want to change the junk between your legs, fine.

but you gotta admit, the same people who are so open to all the folks you mention aren't usually nearly so kind to rednecks and "conservatives." It's still a matter of which viewpoints your gonna be open to.

linz
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.



Please. The liberal side is about progressiveness. If you're liberal and people want to be gay, fine. If they weant to be striaght, fine. IF they want to call themselves John Smith or Moon Unit, fine. If you want to change the junk between your legs, fine.

OTOH, conservatives have this strict doctrine where things have an order and to fall outside of that order is IMPERMISSABLE. Boys are boys and girls are girls. There are boy jobs and girl jobs; don't cross-over. Jesus is our savior and all other religions are of teh devil.... I could go on, but you get it? How much wiggle room do teh consrvs have? Little to none.



Do you know for a fact ALL CONSERVATIVES do not agree that we should all live and let live and that EVERYONE should be free to do as they like unless it violates Natural or Common Law?

I think you're confusing self professed Religous Zealots with those who conservatives.

Don't paint everyone with such a broad paintbrush.

Even true believers in Christianity are lumped together with those who use their own predjudices to put others down.

That is not fair at all.



Quote

Do you know for a fact ALL CONSERVATIVES do not agree that we should all live and let live and that EVERYONE should be free to do as they like unless it violates Natural or Common Law?



I believe very striongly that absolutes suck. I dont believe I speak/write in absolutes, I leave that for the geniuses who don't know much. See, things don't work in 100%, they work in degrees and trends. Do a web seach of, "Mean, median and mode" and you will understand what I speak of/write.

With that, the trend is that conservatives are FAR, FAR more rigid; can you honestly refute that? Please don't say that conservatives are very flexible, they allow you to be protestant, chiristian or catholic. Flexible means any race, any religion, and sexual orientation, etc...

Quote

I think you're confusing self professed Religous Zealots with those who conservatives.



See, you're making it a microcosm, dissecting little bits. On the right you have:

1) Moral conservatives

2) Fiscal conservtaives

3) Both

The moralists are more about 1 man, 1 woman, the fiscal righties are about screwing the poor out of benefits like health coverage and shifting teh governmental power to corporations. Either way, the theme is intollerance.

Quote

Don't paint everyone with such a broad paintbrush.



I am and here's why, there are those who want moral freedoms, but have money and are fiscally right. There are those moralists that feel they want moral rigidity, but want social programs, these are the former Southern Dems. I'm making generalizations about tollerance, that was the issue, right? The righties are generally more tight-ass, lefties allow people to be who they are. Can you refute that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They don't, I feel it should not be a requirement as well as there should not be a ban on the POA.

If someone does not want to recite it fine, but don't impose yor beliefs or restrictions on others,and vice versa.



The problem is that if you have a conservative teacher and the POA is voluntary, there couldbe bias. I guess it could work the other way too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

unless it violates Natural or Common Law?



And what is Natural or Common Law? Who decides what it is?



Maybe it would be helpful to read up on that before you make up your mind, or argue against a statement, if you should choose to do so..

There is a wonderful search engine call google that might be helpful to you.



Cute. There are many different interpretations of natural law floating around - I'm not going to find out what yours is by looking on google.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.



I think most people would consider me liberal in our current political climate. I am anything but close minded.

I don't care by what name you call your God, or even if you believe in a God.

I don't care what chemicals you ingest into your body; it's none of my business.

I don't care if you choose to own weapons or not, nor do I care if those weapons are registered.

I don't care who you choose to have consensual sex with, or what the gender of your partner is.

I do not believe we should force women to have children they do not want to have, even if they are pregnant.

I would not consider these close-minded beliefs.

I do not recite the pledge. I don't stand for the national anthem. My allegiance is to a holistic world community, not any single nation in that community. IMO the "my country, right or wrong" philosophy is a load of crap, and serves only to enable a population of sheeple.

BTW, I did serve my country. Had I known then what I know now, however, I would not have made that mistake.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Being Liberal in this country sounds more and more like closed mindedness.



I think most people would consider me liberal in our current political climate. I am anything but close minded.

I don't care by what name you call your God, or even if you believe in a God.

I don't care what chemicals you ingest into your body; it's none of my business.

I don't care if you choose to own weapons or not, nor do I care if those weapons are registered.

I don't care who you choose to have consensual sex with, or what the gender of your partner is.

I do not believe we should force women to have children they do not want to have, even if they are pregnant.

I would not consider these close-minded beliefs.

I do not recite the pledge. I don't stand for the national anthem. My allegiance is to a holistic world community, not any single nation in that community. IMO the "my country, right or wrong" philosophy is a load of crap, and serves only to enable a population of sheeple.

BTW, I did serve my country. Had I known the what I know now, however, I would not have made that mistake.



I can respect all your views ,and agree with more than you would guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Please. The liberal side is about progressiveness. If you're liberal and people want to be gay, fine. If they weant to be striaght, fine. IF they want to call themselves John Smith or Moon Unit, fine. If you want to change the junk between your legs, fine.

but you gotta admit, the same people who are so open to all the folks you mention aren't usually nearly so kind to rednecks and "conservatives." It's still a matter of which viewpoints your gonna be open to.

linz



Liberals are less open to the people who advocate rigidity, so I guess I agree. Doesn;t it make sense to hold the rigid to their own standard?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not for me to hold anyone, besides myself and my child, to any standard. I don't think it's any more difficult to be open to the rigid than it is to be open to someone who calls herself Moon Unit....even though I may not agree with many of their viewpoints.

linz
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0