Lucky... 0 #1 November 10, 2006 http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061110/pl_nm/usa_elections_congress_republicans_dc_1 That's when the whole mess started, why do that? Then they write: "We are in the wilderness because we walked away from the limited government principles that minted the Republican Congress," Rep. Mike Pence (news, bio, voting record) wrote to colleagues after Democrats seized control of the House of Representatives and the Senate in this week's elections. Spare me, the big gov spending we now have was blueprinted by Regan. How is this current economic scheme different than Reganomics? Cut taxes for the rich, cut social spending and increase spending to corps hoping they will employ people.... simpe supply side / trickle-down economics; what is so unique or different? I know what they're saying, they're saying to go back the grandpa era, where our leader looks like the grandpa we never had instead of this criminla we now have, damned the issues. Many Dems, even Cali Dems bought into the Grandpa Ronnie BS, ignoring the fiscal nighmare he gave birth to. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #2 November 10, 2006 Try to see it as an investment. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #3 November 10, 2006 QuoteTry to see it as an investment. Its a great investment for those who are doing the trickling on others. But some people like those sorts of things. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freethefly 6 #4 November 10, 2006 A return to a Reagan style government would be a nightmare and would do nothing for the common man and everything for the richest of the rich all the while adding to the national debt. They should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work."...And once you're gone, you can't come back When you're out of the blue and into the black." Neil Young Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #5 November 10, 2006 QuoteQuoteTry to see it as an investment. Its a great investment for those who are doing the trickling on others. But some people like those sorts of things. Yep, like the people who benefited from the "Peace Dividend" of the 1990's. You know, like the ones who give Clinton all the credit. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #6 November 10, 2006 QuoteThey should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work. Or, more appropriately, they should look at what a Dem POTUS with a then-principled Republican Congress could do. Remember the era of government shutdowns? I do. "Government gridlock" was the talking point. And check out the benefits! It seemed that the 90's was a great time! Like it or not, Clinton was treated as a lame duck from late 94 until he was reelected in 96. But, I digress. Reagan did fine because he has a Democratic Congress checking him and vice versa. A prime example is the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which was spurred on by Reagan, Dem Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski (whose indictment on corruption charges in 1994 also helped with the 1994 Republican landslide) and officially sponsored in the Senate by liberals Richard Gephardt and Bill Bradley. It lowered the top income tax rate from 50% to 28%and raised the lowest tax from 11% to 15%. It also got rid of tax shelters. Yeah, it certainly caused a short-term shock on the economy (S&L crisis, anyone?) but long-term, did some great things. Now, it seems to me that this trickle-down economics that so many here despise should be placed solely on the shoulders of the liberal Democratic elite. They sponsored it and passed it. Frankly, the Reagan Era is a GREAT time to look at what bipartisan cooperation can do. I think it's a great example of what even a liberal dem Congress can do with a Coservative Republican POTUS. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #7 November 10, 2006 Reagan era? I'm sorry, I can't recall that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #8 November 11, 2006 QuoteA return to a Reagan style government would be a nightmare and would do nothing for the common man and everything for the richest of the rich all the while adding to the national debt. They should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work. That's my point, we don't need to return to it, we are in it. Name the differences to what we now have and what we had under Reagan. I think what they're saying is that we had that Norman Rockwellian feeling under Reagan, which was a smokescreen to the reality of the debt slammers and rich panderers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #9 November 11, 2006 Quote Reagan era? I'm sorry, I can't recall that. Hey, where ya been Ollie? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #10 November 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteThey should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work. Or, more appropriately, they should look at what a Dem POTUS with a then-principled Republican Congress could do. Remember the era of government shutdowns? I do. "Government gridlock" was the talking point. And check out the benefits! It seemed that the 90's was a great time! Like it or not, Clinton was treated as a lame duck from late 94 until he was reelected in 96. But, I digress. Reagan did fine because he has a Democratic Congress checking him and vice versa. A prime example is the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which was spurred on by Reagan, Dem Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski (whose indictment on corruption charges in 1994 also helped with the 1994 Republican landslide) and officially sponsored in the Senate by liberals Richard Gephardt and Bill Bradley. It lowered the top income tax rate from 50% to 28%and raised the lowest tax from 11% to 15%. It also got rid of tax shelters. Yeah, it certainly caused a short-term shock on the economy (S&L crisis, anyone?) but long-term, did some great things. Now, it seems to me that this trickle-down economics that so many here despise should be placed solely on the shoulders of the liberal Democratic elite. They sponsored it and passed it. Frankly, the Reagan Era is a GREAT time to look at what bipartisan cooperation can do. I think it's a great example of what even a liberal dem Congress can do with a Coservative Republican POTUS. QuoteOr, more appropriately, they should look at what a Dem POTUS with a then-principled Republican Congress could do. True, but remember, his first 2 years were with a Dem Congress too, right? He enacted his 1993 Omnibus Spending Bill then which included tax increases for the rich, I think this laid the groundwork for his fiscal success. Also, I do agree to a point, as they got thru the Ergonomics Bill, which Bush struck down, and the Arsenic changes and many other good things with that Congress. QuoteLike it or not, Clinton was treated as a lame duck from late 94 until he was reelected in 96. But, I digress. Perhaps partially true, but based upon this Repub sweep of gov and the outcome, sometimes less (less accompolished) is more. We have only seen 2 years of a Dem sweep,and it ws fantastic, so let's see a Dem sweep again b4 we count it out. QuoteReagan did fine because he has a Democratic Congress checking him and vice versa. A prime example is the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which was spurred on by Reagan, Dem Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski (whose indictment on corruption charges in 1994 also helped with the 1994 Republican landslide) and officially sponsored in the Senate by liberals Richard Gephardt and Bill Bradley. How can you say that when the debt rose trillions under him? Having a new car, boat and house are hollow victories when you go bankrupt 3 years later. QuoteYeah, it certainly caused a short-term shock on the economy (S&L crisis, anyone?) but long-term, did some great things. How do you tie that together - S&L crash to taxes? Could it be guys like Gov Mecham who crashed Lincoln S&L and was criminally indicted? QuoteNow, it seems to me that this trickle-down economics that so many here despise should be placed solely on the shoulders of the liberal Democratic elite. They sponsored it and passed it. Naw, the CIC has the pen to strike it down, so he has the proverbial fuzzy nuts. Unless Congress votes to override him I disagree QuoteFrankly, the Reagan Era is a GREAT time to look at what bipartisan cooperation can do. I think it's a great example of what even a liberal dem Congress can do with a Coservative Republican POTUS. How on Dog's green earth can you say that when the debt rose trillions? It was tripple as to when he inherited it. It was the tax cuts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #11 November 11, 2006 QuoteIt was the tax cuts. Or over spending! Cut out the bullshit programs that the country is full of and tax cuts are not a problem. To bad everybody thinks the government owes them something at the cost of someone else.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #12 November 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteIt was the tax cuts. Or over spending! Cut out the bullshit programs that the country is full of and tax cuts are not a problem. To bad everybody thinks the government owes them something at the cost of someone else. Funny how we have fewer social programs or at least they are less funded and we still have too many. At least oteh countries can rest at peace knowing we not only imperialize their country, but we deprive our own..... they don't have to take it personally when we invade their country as if they're singled out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #13 November 11, 2006 You really should examine the budget sometime. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #14 November 11, 2006 QuoteYou really should examine the budget sometime. Your quasi-Socratic method here is hapless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #15 November 11, 2006 QuoteA return to a Reagan style government would be a nightmare and would do nothing for the common man and everything for the richest of the rich all the while adding to the national debt. They should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work.I was making good (decent) money as a const. worker in my early yrs. Then came RR. The bottom dropped out. Took me yrs. to recover. So much for the little guy that works his ass off.I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #16 November 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteA return to a Reagan style government would be a nightmare and would do nothing for the common man and everything for the richest of the rich all the while adding to the national debt. They should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work.I was making good (decent) money as a const. worker in my early yrs. Then came RR. The bottom dropped out. Took me yrs. to recover. So much for the little guy that works his ass off. Well, that's the "trickle" part in Trickle Down Economics.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #17 November 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteA return to a Reagan style government would be a nightmare and would do nothing for the common man and everything for the richest of the rich all the while adding to the national debt. They should look at what Clinton did to make government actually work.I was making good (decent) money as a const. worker in my early yrs. Then came RR. The bottom dropped out. Took me yrs. to recover. So much for the little guy that works his ass off. I imagine you were, if you were in the union...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #18 November 11, 2006 QuoteI imagine you were, if you were in the union... Sure does help the owners of the construction company to bust the unions up though... They can make far more profits when they hire the illegal aliens to do the same work. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #19 November 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteI imagine you were, if you were in the union... Sure does help the owners of the construction company to bust the unions up though... They can make far more profits when they hire the illegal aliens to do the same work. Even if they don't do that what they do is to get the guys to work against each other so if they want to single one guy out they can. I can't believe the idiocy of the blue-collar man for allowing this. This is who I'm really sharp with, as I can't blame the business man for trying to save a buck. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gjhdiver 0 #20 November 12, 2006 Look to Reagan for inspiration ? I guess we'll see the congressional republicans soiling themselves and talking to their lamp stands soon then. Ba-dum tish. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #21 November 12, 2006 QuoteLook to Reagan for inspiration ? I guess we'll see the congressional republicans soiling themselves and talking to their lamp stands soon then. Ba-dum tish. Yea, my sentiments exactly. They're refering to how the public was duped by Grandpa Ronnie and ignored the damage he did to this country. Hell, he signed the act to give illegal aliens amnesty, then the neo-cons slam every Dem who steps forward with that idea as they "forget" (a Ronnie tradition) what Ronnie did. Politicians are remembered not for what they do, but for how many babies they kiss, and Reagan is emblematic of that. "He was a descent man, just look at him." Not: He started this runaway spending that has led us from 1T to 8.6 T debt. I guess techincal things like budgets and debt are overshadowed by looking Norman Rockwellian. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #22 November 13, 2006 QuoteQuoteLook to Reagan for inspiration ? I guess we'll see the congressional republicans soiling themselves and talking to their lamp stands soon then. Ba-dum tish. Yea, my sentiments exactly. They're refering to how the public was duped by Grandpa Ronnie and ignored the damage he did to this country. Hell, he signed the act to give illegal aliens amnesty, then the neo-cons slam every Dem who steps forward with that idea as they "forget" (a Ronnie tradition) what Ronnie did. Politicians are remembered not for what they do, but for how many babies they kiss, and Reagan is emblematic of that. "He was a descent man, just look at him." Not: He started this runaway spending that has led us from 1T to 8.6 T debt. I guess techincal things like budgets and debt are overshadowed by looking Norman Rockwellian. You may just want to read the actual bill, and not get your info from DU... the Immigration Reform Act wasn't an amnesty.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #23 November 13, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteLook to Reagan for inspiration ? I guess we'll see the congressional republicans soiling themselves and talking to their lamp stands soon then. Ba-dum tish. Yea, my sentiments exactly. They're refering to how the public was duped by Grandpa Ronnie and ignored the damage he did to this country. Hell, he signed the act to give illegal aliens amnesty, then the neo-cons slam every Dem who steps forward with that idea as they "forget" (a Ronnie tradition) what Ronnie did. Politicians are remembered not for what they do, but for how many babies they kiss, and Reagan is emblematic of that. "He was a descent man, just look at him." Not: He started this runaway spending that has led us from 1T to 8.6 T debt. I guess techincal things like budgets and debt are overshadowed by looking Norman Rockwellian. You may just want to read the actual bill, and not get your info from DU... the Immigration Reform Act wasn't an amnesty. I haven't read it, but I do believe it was some sort of amnesty. Why don't you briefly explain what it did. No comment about the all-inspiring Reaganomics? I think we all know this was the downside of his presidency. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #24 November 13, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteLook to Reagan for inspiration ? I guess we'll see the congressional republicans soiling themselves and talking to their lamp stands soon then. Ba-dum tish. Yea, my sentiments exactly. They're refering to how the public was duped by Grandpa Ronnie and ignored the damage he did to this country. Hell, he signed the act to give illegal aliens amnesty, then the neo-cons slam every Dem who steps forward with that idea as they "forget" (a Ronnie tradition) what Ronnie did. Politicians are remembered not for what they do, but for how many babies they kiss, and Reagan is emblematic of that. "He was a descent man, just look at him." Not: He started this runaway spending that has led us from 1T to 8.6 T debt. I guess techincal things like budgets and debt are overshadowed by looking Norman Rockwellian. You may just want to read the actual bill, and not get your info from DU... the Immigration Reform Act wasn't an amnesty. I haven't read it, but I do believe it was some sort of amnesty. Why don't you briefly explain what it did. No comment about the all-inspiring Reaganomics? I think we all know this was the downside of his presidency. Since you were the one talking smack and trying to pass it off as fact, why don't YOU look it up? Google is your friend...you should visit it more often, in fact.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #25 November 13, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteLook to Reagan for inspiration ? I guess we'll see the congressional republicans soiling themselves and talking to their lamp stands soon then. Ba-dum tish. Yea, my sentiments exactly. They're refering to how the public was duped by Grandpa Ronnie and ignored the damage he did to this country. Hell, he signed the act to give illegal aliens amnesty, then the neo-cons slam every Dem who steps forward with that idea as they "forget" (a Ronnie tradition) what Ronnie did. Politicians are remembered not for what they do, but for how many babies they kiss, and Reagan is emblematic of that. "He was a descent man, just look at him." Not: He started this runaway spending that has led us from 1T to 8.6 T debt. I guess techincal things like budgets and debt are overshadowed by looking Norman Rockwellian. You may just want to read the actual bill, and not get your info from DU... the Immigration Reform Act wasn't an amnesty. I haven't read it, but I do believe it was some sort of amnesty. Why don't you briefly explain what it did. No comment about the all-inspiring Reaganomics? I think we all know this was the downside of his presidency. Since you were the one talking smack and trying to pass it off as fact, why don't YOU look it up? Google is your friend...you should visit it more often, in fact. I will, as usual I have to make your claims, which usually end up being a point for me, or you would go ahead and make it. I believe it stated that if an illegal were here for X amiunt of time, established themselves, then they had amnesty and could start the immigration process. That's amnesty. Not some, 'if you're on this side of the fence you're an automatic citizen,' that's not a real form of amnsesty, but I imagine you think I'm stating that's what Reagan did. Again, no love for Reaganomics? HMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm....I can't understand why the avoidance... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites