0
akarunway

Boltons' head on the chopping block next?

Recommended Posts

A few months ago, I remember some Dem senator, I think the woman on the intelligence committee (don't remember her name), saying that she was surprisingly impressed with him, that he was quite reasonable, not an extremist as he had been described by others.

So much for 'working together'.
People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



So much for 'working together'.



Right, you'd think Bush would have figured it out after the poll results that he can't just ram his buddies into top jobs any more, he has to work WITH the Congress.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



So much for 'working together'.



Right, you'd think Bush would have figured it out after the poll results that he can't just ram his buddies into top jobs any more, he has to work WITH the Congress.



You actually believe the Congress is going to work with Bush? All this pink cloud, group hug, BS will be gone as soon as the Libs start trying to shove this country into a Marxist Dreamland as they always do.

Better wise up and get ready for the bare-knucked partisan bickering that always results.

I'm not saying that's the way I want it to be. Just saying that's they way it's been for a long time and I see no reason why it's going to change anytime soon. So get used to it.

-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>as soon as the Libs start trying to shove this country into a
>Marxist Dreamland as they always do.

Well, you've got the dems doing that, and Bush trying to turn the US into a dictatorial corporation-centered empire - at least they _both_ have to move towards the center to get anything done now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>So much for 'working together'.

Yep. Recess appointments probably aren't going to fly any more. Bush will actually have to talk to congress to get his guys approved.



I realize that the recess appointment was an insult to the Dems, I'm just saying that I thought he had surprised them by doing a good job, not being what they had feared he would be. I can't remember him being criticized for anything he had done since his appointment. Perhaps I just missed it. If all this is true, then the Senate Dems just want to get revenge for the insult of the recess appointment, and that is really crappy.
People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


So much for 'working together'.



they are working together with Repub Sen Chafee, who said he
will block the Bolton nomination, or Repub Sen Voinovich who
strongly opposed him before.

There is bipartispanship - just not the one that Bush would like.

Cheers, T
*******************************************************************
Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quite right, 2 repubs opposed him, and at least Chafee still does.

Since you mentioned Voinovich, I thought he also had conceded that Bolton was doing well. Perhaps I'm wrong.

Since he has been in office for a while during some contentious times at the UN, I'd like to know what exactly what part of his performance to which they object. They no longer have to just predict how he will do his job, so what is the problem, what did I miss?
People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quite right, 2 repubs opposed him, and at least Chafee still does.

Since you mentioned Voinovich, I thought he also had conceded that Bolton was doing well. Perhaps I'm wrong.

Since he has been in office for a while during some contentious times at the UN, I'd like to know what exactly what part of his performance they object to. They no longer have to just predict how he will do his job, so what is the problem, what did I miss?



The fact is that Bolton is by no measure a straight forward
nomination, and there are many questions that need to be
answered.

Is he (still) the "quintesential kiss up kick down guy" (as the former
official of this admin C Ford called him) who has a deeply hostile
attitude towards the institution he's supposed to work with, or is a
transformed and effective diplomat.

If he seemd to work well in the last few months was that because he
knew he was "on probabtion" or will you expect him to operate this
way in the future too.

Senators from both sides have points of views on both sides of the
nomination as well as many questions. (There are also dems that
have signaled an open to mildly positive position)

There is a process in place to sort this out. I'd say give that process
some credit and wait for it to take it's course.

Cheers, T
*******************************************************************
Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0