NCclimber 0 #101 November 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteHow did we get get from: QuoteWhat I do have a problem with is this gov't making things illegal because God says it is bad. To: QuoteTypical! The rest of the world doesn't count. Ever hear of the Holy Roman Empire? The Spanish Inquisition? Non sequitur? There are other logical fallacies besides the oh so popular "strawman". Very "sequitur", you just need to cast aside the US-centric blinkers That might make sense if the discussion wasn't about the US government. Actually it's about the resignation of a GOP scumbag, take a look at the title I said discussion, not OP (or thread). Can you tell the difference? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #102 November 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteHow did we get get from: QuoteWhat I do have a problem with is this gov't making things illegal because God says it is bad. To: QuoteTypical! The rest of the world doesn't count. Ever hear of the Holy Roman Empire? The Spanish Inquisition? Non sequitur? There are other logical fallacies besides the oh so popular "strawman". Very "sequitur", you just need to cast aside the US-centric blinkers That might make sense if the discussion wasn't about the US government. Actually it's about the resignation of a GOP scumbag, take a look at the title I said discussion, not OP (or thread). Can you tell the difference? Who made you the arbiter of what comes up in discussion?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #103 November 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteHow did we get get from: QuoteWhat I do have a problem with is this gov't making things illegal because God says it is bad. To: QuoteTypical! The rest of the world doesn't count. Ever hear of the Holy Roman Empire? The Spanish Inquisition? Non sequitur? There are other logical fallacies besides the oh so popular "strawman". Very "sequitur", you just need to cast aside the US-centric blinkers That might make sense if the discussion wasn't about the US government. Actually it's about the resignation of a GOP scumbag, take a look at the title I said discussion, not OP (or thread). Can you tell the difference? Who made you the arbiter of what comes up in discussion? Are we getting testy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #104 November 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteHow did we get get from: QuoteWhat I do have a problem with is this gov't making things illegal because God says it is bad. To: QuoteTypical! The rest of the world doesn't count. Ever hear of the Holy Roman Empire? The Spanish Inquisition? Non sequitur? There are other logical fallacies besides the oh so popular "strawman". Very "sequitur", you just need to cast aside the US-centric blinkers That might make sense if the discussion wasn't about the US government. Actually it's about the resignation of a GOP scumbag, take a look at the title I said discussion, not OP (or thread). Can you tell the difference? Who made you the arbiter of what comes up in discussion? Are we getting testy? I'm not the guy who's trying to inhibit free and open discussion. Look in the mirror. Volunteer to be a greenie. Just don't whine if the discussion takes a turn that you don't like.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #105 November 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteHow did we get get from: QuoteWhat I do have a problem with is this gov't making things illegal because God says it is bad. To: QuoteTypical! The rest of the world doesn't count. Ever hear of the Holy Roman Empire? The Spanish Inquisition? Non sequitur? There are other logical fallacies besides the oh so popular "strawman". Very "sequitur", you just need to cast aside the US-centric blinkers That might make sense if the discussion wasn't about the US government. Actually it's about the resignation of a GOP scumbag, take a look at the title I said discussion, not OP (or thread). Can you tell the difference? Who made you the arbiter of what comes up in discussion? Are we getting testy? I'm not the guy who's trying to inhibit free and open discussion. Look in the mirror. Volunteer to be a greenie. Just don't whine if the discussion takes a turn that you don't like. Was that a YES? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
