azdiver 0 #101 November 7, 2006 so to keep the mad theory should we start providing nukes to all the countries that might have some disagreement with nk, were not at war with nk but i still think hes nutslight travels faster than sound, that's why some people appear to be bright until you hear them speak Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #102 November 7, 2006 Quoteso to keep the mad theory should we start providing nukes to all the countries that might have some disagreement with nk, were not at war with nk but i still think hes nuts Well, please remember that the only nut who has started an actual shooting war recently is George W. Bush, and the outcome of that is a fiasco that has cost thousands of US lives, tens of thousands of the folks we went to "liberate" and a cost that will run to a $Trillion before it's over.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,119 #103 November 7, 2006 > so to keep the mad theory should we start providing nukes to all >the countries that might have some disagreement with nk . . . Nope, no need. There are enough allies with nuclear weapons around the world that NK will not get away with nuking anyone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zoobrothertom 5 #104 November 7, 2006 You and I both know that Bush or no Bush, NK would have developed them anyway. Their program never stopped after the Clinton deal. I'm not pointing fingers at either President. I have lived over here (SK) for 5 years and have learned that Mr. Kim is quite the whako Jones'n for a jump in South Korea ____________________________________ I'm back in the USA!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites