sundevil777 102 #76 October 31, 2006 >Uh . . so what? Uh . . if Clinton can be a bigot by your reckoning, and still be the darling of the Democrats, then why should those opposed to gay marriage on the Republican side be vilified by Democrats. That is what is so what. Seemed pretty obvious to me. Why is being opposed to polygamy OK? I know a lot will say that they don't have a problem with it being legal, but they also don't have a problem (they aren't vilified as bigots, or 'phobes) with those that would not let that be so.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #77 October 31, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteYep. I think it's a lot more efficacious to teach children to be nice to everybody because it's right, rather than teaching them to be nice to each person, one difference at a time.... Oh oh that is leftist PC propoganda.... I mean how will the good ole boys feel about tjhat when you cant call a n$#%# a n$##@ or a fairy a fairy... why can't you use the word nigger? chris rock can ! That's NIGGA to you NIGGAI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #78 October 31, 2006 >if Clinton can be a bigot by your reckoning, and still be the darling >of the Democrats, then why should those opposed to gay marriage on the >Republican side be vilified by Democrats. I have no idea. Do you support Clinton? >Seemed pretty obvious to me. Still not seeing it. No one was talking about what any politician supports. (Unless you're just getting the required Clinton slam in - in which case, consider it done and move on.) >Why is being opposed to polygamy OK? I know a lot will say that they >don't have a problem with it being legal, but they also don't have a >problem (they aren't vilified as bigots, or 'phobes) with those that would >not let that be so. Can't parse that sentence. Are you saying that "a lot" will not have a problem with those that would not have a problem with polygamy? Or will "a lot" not have a problem with people who DO have a problem with polygamy? And if they do - what does that mean, anyway? In any case, are you against polygamy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,610 #79 October 31, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteYep. I think it's a lot more efficacious to teach children to be nice to everybody because it's right, rather than teaching them to be nice to each person, one difference at a time.... Oh oh that is leftist PC propoganda.... I mean how will the good ole boys feel about tjhat when you cant call a n$#%# a n$##@ or a fairy a fairy... why can't you use the word nigger? chris rock can ! "I looove black people, but I hate niggers!"Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbrown 26 #80 November 1, 2006 QuoteQuoteThe KKK are incredibly racist, but I don't think they are secretly black. Dont forget their abject hatred of Jews.. maybe they just want to be one of GOD's chosen people and cant. They may not be black, but their grandma might be. To this day the white branch of Thomas Jefferson's family refuses to recognize Jefferson's black descendants by his slave Sally Hemmings, inspite of mounting DNA evidence. I remember once reading about some Klansman who committed suicide because he couldn't reconcile his shame at being a Jew himself. He'd been able to hide it, but couldn't live with it. It stands to reason that a man who is raised to believe being gay is sinful or shameful would hate and fear his own attraction to other guys. He sees them and fears becoming one of "them". Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
