jcd11235 0
Recommended Posts
If the Senate vote on his impeachment was the end of it, what was all the hubbub with the deal he cut on his last day in office?
QuoteIf the Senate vote on his impeachment was the end of it, what was all the hubbub with the deal he cut on his last day in office?
A refresher:
Quote"I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I did not fully accomplish this goal and am certain my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false," Clinton said in a written statement released Friday by the White House.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/stories/01/19/clinton.lewinsky/
juanesky 0
QuoteQuoteSo, would you then agree that Clinton lied under oath
I would liek to see some evidence on where he lied under oath, other than related to his comment about "sexual relations". If he lied about anything under oath, then I agree with you completely. Though it has been said many times, technically he did not lie about the "sexual relations" part.
Oh boy this is fun....Here is the Clinton impeachment process. Look up January 17. He can not "recall" if he was ever alone with Lewinsky in the Oval office.
It was in the Paula Jones trial as you can see.
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
juanesky 0
You beat me to it. Damn, how nice is being able to lie "semantically". Isn't it?
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
SkyDekker 1,465
QuoteHe can not "recall" if he was ever alone with Lewinsky in the Oval office.
How would you ever prove if that was a lie at that point? I know it is semantics, but everything in law is. Hard to base a perjury case on that.
So far I am still waiting to see actual evidence he lied. We all know he played a semantics game, knowingly. But, where did he actually lie?
juanesky 0
Apparently you did not read the link. You need to look it up. http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/clinton.htm
Even Gravitymaster quoted what Clinton declared to the media following the termination of the impeachment process, and you still have doubts?
Not worse blind than those who refuse to see....
Even Gravitymaster quoted what Clinton declared to the media following the termination of the impeachment process, and you still have doubts?
Not worse blind than those who refuse to see....
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
jcd11235 0
QuoteOh boy this is fun....Here is the Clinton impeachment process. Look up January 17. He can not "recall" if he was ever alone with Lewinsky in the Oval office.
Given the close proximity of Secret Service agents, it does not seem unreasonable for him to not recall whether or not he and Monica were ever alone.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
juanesky 0
Yes, we all can see that he had always the SS present while.....never mind.
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
SkyDekker 1,465
QuoteApparently you did not read the link. You need to look it up. http://www.historyplace.com/...achments/clinton.htm
Even Gravitymaster quoted what Clinton declared to the media following the termination of the impeachment process, and you still have doubts?
They are all semantics games. testifying falsly can be difefernt from lieing under oath. See, he may now recall that he was alone with her in the oval office. That would mean his testimony might have been false, yet he still did not lie. he may not have recalled at the time of teh question.
Yes, I know, semantics. But, still waiting to see where, in a perjury trial, you would get the evidence to prove he lied under oath?
jcd11235 0
QuoteYes, we all can see that he had always the SS present while.....never mind.
Do you really think they would have said anything had they been present? It is entirely plausible they were there.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
Amazon 7
QuoteYes, we all can see that he had always the SS present while.....never mind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you really think they would have said anything had they been present? It is entirely plausible they were there.
Hell I had an Ultra Right Wing NUTJOB here in the local area try to tell me that a friend of his who is friends of a SS agent was told that Hillary was having other women snuck into the White House at night by the Secret Service....
SOOO since this story has NEVER come out... I would take it the SS is VERY DISCREET
Actually Considering this source.. another Clinton HATER.... I dont even give it any form of credible possibility...that would just be TOO BIG of a story to cover up.. with as many Clinton Haters there are out there and here on DIZZIE DOT COM.
QuoteQuoteYes, we all can see that he had always the SS present while.....never mind.
Do you really think they would have said anything had they been present? It is entirely plausible they were there.
In all the movies and tv shows that had Oval Office scenes, how many times were Secret Service agents actually in the office?
jcd11235 0
QuoteIn all the movies and tv shows that had Oval Office scenes, how many times were Secret Service agents actually in the office?
We obviously get our information from different sources. I tend to not rely on movies and television shows (excepting the occasional news program) for my info.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
juanesky 0
I can imagine the prez taking a dump with many SSS agents around him. Reminds me of Chapelle's show sketch of the "first" black using a white only bathroom...
. Reminds me of Chapelle's show sketch of the "first" black using a white only bathroom..."According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
QuoteQuoteIn all the movies and tv shows that had Oval Office scenes, how many times were Secret Service agents actually in the office?
We obviously get our information from different sources. I tend to not rely on movies and television shows (excepting the occasional news program) for my info.
Do you have any information on where SS agents are, while the POTUS is in the Oval Office? Are you merely trying to discount my point?
Regarding Amazon's latest vitriol - I heard Chelsea was conceived when Bill "raped" Hillary. Sounds like a healthy hetero relationship to me.
billvon 3,132
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)
>I heard Chelsea was conceived when Bill "raped" Hillary.
And I heard the Bush twins were conceived during a coke-and-booze bender Bush was on - which is why they can't get enough of the stuff now!
Now, what can we make up about Kerry? Maybe those Swift Boat guys have a few more ideas.
And I heard the Bush twins were conceived during a coke-and-booze bender Bush was on - which is why they can't get enough of the stuff now!
Now, what can we make up about Kerry? Maybe those Swift Boat guys have a few more ideas.
Quote>I heard Chelsea was conceived when Bill "raped" Hillary.
And I heard the Bush twins were conceived during a coke-and-booze bender Bush was on - which is why they can't get enough of the stuff now!
Now, what can we make up about Kerry? Maybe those Swift Boat guys have a few more ideas.
I heard Kerry was involved in massacring civilians in free-fire zones. I wonder if there's any truth to that?
-
billvon 3,132
>I heard Kerry was involved in massacring civilians in free-fire zones.
I like it! Add some cocaine, some torture, a few mass graves and a one-armed man, and you might have a winner!
I like it! Add some cocaine, some torture, a few mass graves and a one-armed man, and you might have a winner!
Amazon 7
QuoteI heard Kerry was involved in massacring civilians in free-fire zones. I wonder if there's any truth to that?
Perhaps you should have gone yourself.. so you would have known for yourself who was the enemy and who was not.
Quote>I heard Kerry was involved in massacring civilians in free-fire zones.
I like it! Add some cocaine, some torture, a few mass graves and a one-armed man, and you might have a winner!
You forgot the sexy women.
-
I don't know about mass graves, but I heard the Clintons have had over fifty people killed.
If Vince Foster were alive today, I wonder if he could help find out what actually happened in Ohio, back in "04.
If Vince Foster were alive today, I wonder if he could help find out what actually happened in Ohio, back in "04.
jcd11235 0
QuoteDo you have any information on where SS agents are, while the POTUS is in the Oval Office? Are you merely trying to discount my point?
What point?
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
SkyDekker 1,465
QuoteI don't know about mass graves, but I heard the Clintons have had over fifty people killed.
I don't know about that, but I heard Bush Jr. likes to get fucked up the ass by Hillary Clinton wearing a strap-on.
So you think we should sue Clinton in civil court?
It's not my theory, it the Constitution. A sitting president is tried for a crime via impeachment. If you are not happy with that then your grief should be with the Constitution, and not Clinton. With Clinton, persecution aside, the system worked exactly as it was designed. He was charged, impeached and acquitted.
BTW The reason Ford had to pardon Nixon was because Nixon was not impeached; he did not face prosecution as Clinton did.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites