akarunway 1 #1 October 25, 2006 WHAT A FUCKIN JOKE>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/24/national/main2122004.shtmlSadI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #2 October 25, 2006 DHS is involved in this exactly HOW, again?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #3 October 25, 2006 QuoteDHS is involved in this exactly HOW, again? Where did he mention DHS?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #4 October 25, 2006 DUDE... that is a CBS report.. and therby not authorized as a credible news source by the Ultra Right Wing White House Propaganda Department. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #5 October 25, 2006 Other than in the thread title, you mean? Nowhere, that's why I was confused.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #6 October 25, 2006 QuoteDUDE... that is a CBS report.. and therby not authorized as a credible news source by the Ultra Right Wing White House Propaganda Department. I take it you missed the Fox interview with ABC News Director, Mark Halperin, talking about the liberal tilt to major media... Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #7 October 25, 2006 I try to miss Fox News...... since Fair and Balaced has MORE THAN just a slight slant to the FAR FAR Right. I guess it SEEMS fair and balanced when you are so far to that same leaning Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #8 October 25, 2006 QuoteI try to miss Fox News...... since Fair and Balaced has MORE THAN just a slight slant to the FAR FAR Right. I guess it SEEMS fair and balanced when you are so far to that same leaning Actually, it only SEEMS far far right to those on the FAR FAR left... Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #9 October 25, 2006 While many liberals view mainstream America as right-wing, they fail to realize it's not mainstream values that have changed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #10 October 25, 2006 QuoteOther than in the thread title, you mean? The thread title doesn't make reference to DHS, it makes reference to US Homeland security. if I make a thread about US Justice, it isn't the same as a thread about the US Justice Department, though it could include them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #11 October 25, 2006 QuoteActually, it only SEEMS far far right to those on the FAR FAR left... See there you go again... characterizing ANYTHING to the left( ie... moderate) as the far far left... I guess when you are sitting that far to the RIGHT.. that EVERYTHING else APPEARS to be far left Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #12 October 25, 2006 QuoteQuoteActually, it only SEEMS far far right to those on the FAR FAR left... See there you go again... characterizing ANYTHING to the left( ie... moderate) as the far far left... I guess when you are sitting that far to the RIGHT.. that EVERYTHING else APPEARS to be far left And vice versa, evidently...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #13 October 25, 2006 QuoteQuoteOther than in the thread title, you mean? The thread title doesn't make reference to DHS, it makes reference to US Homeland security. if I make a thread about US Justice, it isn't the same as a thread about the US Justice Department, though it could include them. Find me the USA Homeland Security website, then. This had nothing to do with DHS, and everything to do (again) with internal security at the lab.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #14 October 25, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOther than in the thread title, you mean? The thread title doesn't make reference to DHS, it makes reference to US Homeland security. if I make a thread about US Justice, it isn't the same as a thread about the US Justice Department, though it could include them. Find me the USA Homeland Security website, then. This had nothing to do with DHS, and everything to do (again) with internal security at the lab. So you don't think the loss of classified documents from a nuclear weapons lab affects the security of the US homeland? Strange, but OK. He did NOT mention DHS. Your error.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #15 October 25, 2006 QuoteFind me the USA Homeland Security website, then. This had nothing to do with DHS, and everything to do (again) with internal security at the lab. And that leak could very conceivably affect US Homeland security. You are right, that has nothing to do directly with DHS. I don't think there is a website for the concept of homeland security. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #16 October 25, 2006 Quote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Reply To -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Reply To -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Actually, it only SEEMS far far right to those on the FAR FAR left... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See there you go again... characterizing ANYTHING to the left( ie... moderate) as the far far left... I guess when you are sitting that far to the RIGHT.. that EVERYTHING else APPEARS to be far left -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And vice versa, evidently... OK then to use one of your FAVORITE tactics.... " Do you have a "CITE" for that" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #17 October 25, 2006 QuoteOK then to use one of your FAVORITE tactics.... " Do you have a "CITE" for that" From the National Nuclear Security Agency website: QuoteFunction Statement The Administrator has authority over, and is responsible for, all programs and activities of the Administration (except for the functions of the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors under Executive Order 12344), including the following: 1. Strategic management. 2. Policy development and guidance. 3. Budget formulation, guidance, and execution, and other financial matters. 4. Resource requirements determination and allocation. 5. Program management and direction. 6. Safeguards and security. 7. Emergency management. 8. Integrated safety management. 9. Environment, safety, and health operations. 10. Administration of contracts, including the management and operations of the nuclear weapons production facilities and the national security laboratories. NNSA is under DOE, not DHS.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #18 October 25, 2006 DUDE.. lets get on track here I was looking for a "CITE" that puts me to the far far left...... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #19 October 25, 2006 QuoteQuoteOK then to use one of your FAVORITE tactics.... " Do you have a "CITE" for that" From the National Nuclear Security Agency website: QuoteFunction Statement The Administrator has authority over, and is responsible for, all programs and activities of the Administration (except for the functions of the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors under Executive Order 12344), including the following: 1. Strategic management. 2. Policy development and guidance. 3. Budget formulation, guidance, and execution, and other financial matters. 4. Resource requirements determination and allocation. 5. Program management and direction. 6. Safeguards and security. 7. Emergency management. 8. Integrated safety management. 9. Environment, safety, and health operations. 10. Administration of contracts, including the management and operations of the nuclear weapons production facilities and the national security laboratories. NNSA is under DOE, not DHS. Why do you have this hang up about DHS? No-one mentioned DHS until you brought it up. However, if you want to resurrect the FEMA/DHS debacle over Katrina, I suppose this is a good place to do it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #20 October 25, 2006 http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/homeland/index.htmlI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #21 October 25, 2006 Thanks for pointing me to a website with Bush's speeches on homeland security. I doubt however he is eitehr intelligent enough, nor verbally capable enough to explain the concept of homeland security without having it first written out for him.... (ie it doesn't define the concept of homeland security, it just tells us what Bush supposedly has done to help it. Funny enough it doens't mention how his decision to invade Iraq has significantly and negativaly impacted Homeland security in the US.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #22 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteI try to miss Fox News...... since Fair and Balaced has MORE THAN just a slight slant to the FAR FAR Right. I guess it SEEMS fair and balanced when you are so far to that same leaning Actually, it only SEEMS far far right to those on the FAR FAR left... You mean those of us opposed to facsim? Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #23 October 26, 2006 Quote Why do you have this hang up about DHS? No-one mentioned DHS until you brought it up. However, if you want to resurrect the FEMA/DHS debacle over Katrina, I suppose this is a good place to do it. I invite you to, once again, READ THE THREAD TITLE. Homeland security is NOT involved with the theft from Los Alamos.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr2mk1g 10 #24 October 26, 2006 The theft from Los Alamos most certainly does affect homeland security though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #25 October 26, 2006 QuoteThe theft from Los Alamos most certainly does affect homeland security though. Yes, it certainly does. Security for the Nat'l Labs is the responsibility of the NNSA, however. That's why I was saying the thread TITLE (there it is again, Kallend) was misleading.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
