Gravitymaster 0 #126 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyD 0 #127 October 26, 2006 Quote How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - I meant to say that they should not impede it. It would be nice to remove them all together and put all funds into a general fund to be distributed by importance, but of course that would have to be controlled by someone. FDA? Could be the most corrupt gov't. agency. We would have to figure something out and when it doesn't work I would end up bitching about it. This would be a good time for a good idea. Best I can come up with is: Politicians hose up 10x more things than they help. Don't allow lawyers to impede scientists. Other than that, I don't know. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #128 October 26, 2006 QuoteNo love nor compassion for the likes of Limbaugh. He is a national disgrace. He is a POSTER BOY for the Republican Right....and reflects them to a tee..... Its just now that he was CAUGHT doing wrong that some of them have backed away from him.. BUT.. we still have the legions of DITTOHEADS who idolize him... and wish soooooo hard to believe that all of his problems are an evil Democratic plot Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #129 October 26, 2006 QuoteHow do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? On the Flip side.. how do you expect to get government out of our schools when the RIGHT is specifically targeting local school boards so they can control what dogma is taught to the young.... AND giving away billions to private schools of FAITH based dogmatic training of the young as well... where the RELIGIOUS WRONG CANT get their idiocy taught in their local public systems. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #130 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteHow do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? On the Flip side.. how do you expect to get government out of our schools when the RIGHT is specifically targeting local school boards so they can control what dogma is taught to the young.... AND giving away billions to private schools of FAITH based dogmatic training of the young as well... where the RELIGIOUS WRONG CANT get their idiocy taught in their local public systems. You forget that I'm one of those extreme right-wing fruitcakes you rant about who actually believes in school choice. You are either with me or against me on this issue. If you are against me, then you are uncaring and a proponent of dumbed down education that plants the seeds for forced religious dogmas and corrupt morality on innocent children. - - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #131 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Or are you one of those Liberals who believes the Govt. has unlimited deep pockets? - A quick look at actual data reveals that government spending and debt goes up more under "conservative" administrations. Not that facts should affect your opinions. See there, as soon as I make a suggestion on how to reduce spending, you criticize it. Freekin Liberals, geez... - Address the issue, where is your graphical data? Who spends more? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #132 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote Now you are just getting whiney and looking for a point to agrue. You're right, there is no merit in discussing the present investment in two resources under comparison. It's pure barratry. Good night. What I've learned from arguing with many people, particularly liberals, is that unless I am willing to take the most extreme position on an issue, I'm automatically uncaring and a _____(fill in blank)_______ Enough, let's address these issues empirically. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #133 October 26, 2006 Personally I want my tax money being spent on EDUCATING the next generation.. its our duty as a society .. period.. even if I do not have children in the school system. By educating them we end up with a better society in the long run.... not a bunch of uneducated anarchists. BUT giving my tax money to church based... faith based education is WRONG... I do not want the government supporting ANY particular religion. I went to parochial schools... I got a fairly good education there.. BUT it was my parents who footed the bill for that... AND they paid taxes that supported other children in the public schools. School vouchers are very simply this administrations attempt at paying off their base... free government money to support a very specific religious minority of evangelical christians who are in lockstep with the purported ideals of this far right wing power grab of our country. The founding fathers were fairly specific about wanting to separate churches and government for a very good reason. They had witnessed firsthand the abuses that occur when the two are intermingled. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #134 October 26, 2006 Quote A more accurate analogy would have one account paying 10% and the other paying .05% How did you reach this conclusion without considering the level of investment? Is it something you take on faith or you do have a reason to believe one vs the other?My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #135 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Now you are just getting whiney and looking for a point to agrue. You're right, there is no merit in discussing the present investment in two resources under comparison. It's pure barratry. Good night. What I've learned from arguing with many people, particularly liberals, is that unless I am willing to take the most extreme position on an issue, I'm automatically uncaring and a _____(fill in blank)_______ Enough, let's address these issues empirically. I have. Perhaps you missed it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #136 October 26, 2006 QuotePersonally I want my tax money being spent on EDUCATING the next generation.. its our duty as a society .. period.. even if I do not have children in the school system. By educating them we end up with a better society in the long run.... not a bunch of uneducated anarchists. BUT giving my tax money to church based... faith based education is WRONG... I do not want the government supporting ANY particular religion. I went to parochial schools... I got a fairly good education there.. BUT it was my parents who footed the bill for that... AND they paid taxes that supported other children in the public schools. School vouchers are very simply this administrations attempt at paying off their base... free government money to support a very specific religious minority of evangelical christians who are in lockstep with the purported ideals of this far right wing power grab of our country. The founding fathers were fairly specific about wanting to separate churches and government for a very good reason. They had witnessed firsthand the abuses that occur when the two are intermingled. I mostly agree. I just think all govt. run education should be done away with. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #137 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote A more accurate analogy would have one account paying 10% and the other paying .05% How did you reach this conclusion without considering the level of investment? Is it something you take on faith or you do have a reason to believe one vs the other? Uh, well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little in comparison would be one reason. See the chart I posted. Let me try it another way. See if this makes sense to you: I am looking at 2 stocks. Stock#1 has gone up 235% in the past 18 months. Stock#2 has gone up 3% in the same time period. Now, I'm not going to completely ignore the lower performing stock#2 particularly if it's in a field that I think shows the potential for future gains. OTOH, I'm not going to pour as much money into stock#2 as I would the better performing stock#1 until I start to see some more encouraging results. I would then need to decide if I'm going to take money away from the better performing stock#1 to invest in stock#2 that is producing less results. Over time if the poorer performing stock#2 produces results, I would be more willing to gradually make a greater investment into it. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #138 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Or are you one of those Liberals who believes the Govt. has unlimited deep pockets? - A quick look at actual data reveals that government spending and debt goes up more under "conservative" administrations. Not that facts should affect your opinions. See there, as soon as I make a suggestion on how to reduce spending, you criticize it. Freekin Liberals, geez... - Address the issue, where is your graphical data? Who spends more? You know, sometimes when you make a complete non-sequiter comment like this in response to an obviously innocuous statement, it's as if you are just looking for a fight. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #139 October 26, 2006 Quoteit's as if you are just looking for a fight. Hey.. put up yur dukes there mister....lets rumble.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #140 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteit's as if you are just looking for a fight. Hey.. put up yur dukes there mister....lets rumble.. Naked? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #141 October 26, 2006 Now that I KNOW you could not handle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #142 October 26, 2006 Quote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? It is fact that investment in one has been artificially restricted, to the benefit of the other.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #143 October 26, 2006 Quote OTOH, I'm not going to pour as much money into stock#2 as I would the better performing stock#1 until I start to see some more encouraging results. That's called performance chasing, and it is an unsound financial strategy. It is also an unsound strategy for research policy.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #144 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. Or are you just stirring the pot? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #145 October 26, 2006 Quote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #146 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - We could pay for a whole lot of research with the money we've wasted bringing Iraq to the verge of a civil war, and the money we will have to spend caring for wounded veterans.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #147 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know. The links he posted a few pages back might help. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #148 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - We could pay for a whole lot of research with the money we've wasted bringing Iraq to the verge of a civil war, and the money we will have to spend caring for wounded veterans. Right, getting out of Iraq is the panacea to all our problems. How come we haven't solved the "war on poverty" after pumping $5 trillion into it? How come we have so many other problems that weren't solved before the war? - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #149 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know. The links he posted a few pages back might help. You know, I just don't know why I bother sometimes. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #150 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? It is fact that investment in one has been artificially restricted, to the benefit of the other. Thank you for your investment advice. I'll keep that in mind as I make one of the 15 to 20 trades I make daily. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page 6 of 7 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Lucky... 0 #132 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote Now you are just getting whiney and looking for a point to agrue. You're right, there is no merit in discussing the present investment in two resources under comparison. It's pure barratry. Good night. What I've learned from arguing with many people, particularly liberals, is that unless I am willing to take the most extreme position on an issue, I'm automatically uncaring and a _____(fill in blank)_______ Enough, let's address these issues empirically. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #133 October 26, 2006 Personally I want my tax money being spent on EDUCATING the next generation.. its our duty as a society .. period.. even if I do not have children in the school system. By educating them we end up with a better society in the long run.... not a bunch of uneducated anarchists. BUT giving my tax money to church based... faith based education is WRONG... I do not want the government supporting ANY particular religion. I went to parochial schools... I got a fairly good education there.. BUT it was my parents who footed the bill for that... AND they paid taxes that supported other children in the public schools. School vouchers are very simply this administrations attempt at paying off their base... free government money to support a very specific religious minority of evangelical christians who are in lockstep with the purported ideals of this far right wing power grab of our country. The founding fathers were fairly specific about wanting to separate churches and government for a very good reason. They had witnessed firsthand the abuses that occur when the two are intermingled. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nathaniel 0 #134 October 26, 2006 Quote A more accurate analogy would have one account paying 10% and the other paying .05% How did you reach this conclusion without considering the level of investment? Is it something you take on faith or you do have a reason to believe one vs the other?My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #135 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Now you are just getting whiney and looking for a point to agrue. You're right, there is no merit in discussing the present investment in two resources under comparison. It's pure barratry. Good night. What I've learned from arguing with many people, particularly liberals, is that unless I am willing to take the most extreme position on an issue, I'm automatically uncaring and a _____(fill in blank)_______ Enough, let's address these issues empirically. I have. Perhaps you missed it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #136 October 26, 2006 QuotePersonally I want my tax money being spent on EDUCATING the next generation.. its our duty as a society .. period.. even if I do not have children in the school system. By educating them we end up with a better society in the long run.... not a bunch of uneducated anarchists. BUT giving my tax money to church based... faith based education is WRONG... I do not want the government supporting ANY particular religion. I went to parochial schools... I got a fairly good education there.. BUT it was my parents who footed the bill for that... AND they paid taxes that supported other children in the public schools. School vouchers are very simply this administrations attempt at paying off their base... free government money to support a very specific religious minority of evangelical christians who are in lockstep with the purported ideals of this far right wing power grab of our country. The founding fathers were fairly specific about wanting to separate churches and government for a very good reason. They had witnessed firsthand the abuses that occur when the two are intermingled. I mostly agree. I just think all govt. run education should be done away with. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #137 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote A more accurate analogy would have one account paying 10% and the other paying .05% How did you reach this conclusion without considering the level of investment? Is it something you take on faith or you do have a reason to believe one vs the other? Uh, well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little in comparison would be one reason. See the chart I posted. Let me try it another way. See if this makes sense to you: I am looking at 2 stocks. Stock#1 has gone up 235% in the past 18 months. Stock#2 has gone up 3% in the same time period. Now, I'm not going to completely ignore the lower performing stock#2 particularly if it's in a field that I think shows the potential for future gains. OTOH, I'm not going to pour as much money into stock#2 as I would the better performing stock#1 until I start to see some more encouraging results. I would then need to decide if I'm going to take money away from the better performing stock#1 to invest in stock#2 that is producing less results. Over time if the poorer performing stock#2 produces results, I would be more willing to gradually make a greater investment into it. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #138 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Or are you one of those Liberals who believes the Govt. has unlimited deep pockets? - A quick look at actual data reveals that government spending and debt goes up more under "conservative" administrations. Not that facts should affect your opinions. See there, as soon as I make a suggestion on how to reduce spending, you criticize it. Freekin Liberals, geez... - Address the issue, where is your graphical data? Who spends more? You know, sometimes when you make a complete non-sequiter comment like this in response to an obviously innocuous statement, it's as if you are just looking for a fight. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #139 October 26, 2006 Quoteit's as if you are just looking for a fight. Hey.. put up yur dukes there mister....lets rumble.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #140 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteit's as if you are just looking for a fight. Hey.. put up yur dukes there mister....lets rumble.. Naked? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #141 October 26, 2006 Now that I KNOW you could not handle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #142 October 26, 2006 Quote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? It is fact that investment in one has been artificially restricted, to the benefit of the other.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #143 October 26, 2006 Quote OTOH, I'm not going to pour as much money into stock#2 as I would the better performing stock#1 until I start to see some more encouraging results. That's called performance chasing, and it is an unsound financial strategy. It is also an unsound strategy for research policy.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #144 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. Or are you just stirring the pot? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites nathaniel 0 #145 October 26, 2006 Quote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #146 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - We could pay for a whole lot of research with the money we've wasted bringing Iraq to the verge of a civil war, and the money we will have to spend caring for wounded veterans.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #147 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know. The links he posted a few pages back might help. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #148 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - We could pay for a whole lot of research with the money we've wasted bringing Iraq to the verge of a civil war, and the money we will have to spend caring for wounded veterans. Right, getting out of Iraq is the panacea to all our problems. How come we haven't solved the "war on poverty" after pumping $5 trillion into it? How come we have so many other problems that weren't solved before the war? - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #149 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know. The links he posted a few pages back might help. You know, I just don't know why I bother sometimes. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #150 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? It is fact that investment in one has been artificially restricted, to the benefit of the other. Thank you for your investment advice. I'll keep that in mind as I make one of the 15 to 20 trades I make daily. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page 6 of 7 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Amazon 7 #139 October 26, 2006 Quoteit's as if you are just looking for a fight. Hey.. put up yur dukes there mister....lets rumble.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #140 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteit's as if you are just looking for a fight. Hey.. put up yur dukes there mister....lets rumble.. Naked? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #141 October 26, 2006 Now that I KNOW you could not handle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nathaniel 0 #142 October 26, 2006 Quote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? It is fact that investment in one has been artificially restricted, to the benefit of the other.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nathaniel 0 #143 October 26, 2006 Quote OTOH, I'm not going to pour as much money into stock#2 as I would the better performing stock#1 until I start to see some more encouraging results. That's called performance chasing, and it is an unsound financial strategy. It is also an unsound strategy for research policy.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #144 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. Or are you just stirring the pot? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nathaniel 0 #145 October 26, 2006 Quote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #146 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - We could pay for a whole lot of research with the money we've wasted bringing Iraq to the verge of a civil war, and the money we will have to spend caring for wounded veterans.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #147 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know. The links he posted a few pages back might help. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #148 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNot to mention that Fox is misleading at best and lying at worst but, since you think his message is the true word you defend him and, as Coulter has correctly said, you consider him untouchable because he has an illness and we should be nice to him. Fuck that!! He threw himself into the political area to put forth his message. And you think because he has an illness he is hands off?? FUCK that too!! I sincerely wish that everyone against stem cell research has a child who has alzhimers, parkinsons, or becomes paralized from the neck down. I bet we would see a huge change in public sentiment about stem cell research and force politicians to get the fuck out of the way of science and go back to ruining the country through uncontrolled spending. How do you plan on getting Govt. out of the research decisions when you have so many people calling for increased govt. spending? - We could pay for a whole lot of research with the money we've wasted bringing Iraq to the verge of a civil war, and the money we will have to spend caring for wounded veterans. Right, getting out of Iraq is the panacea to all our problems. How come we haven't solved the "war on poverty" after pumping $5 trillion into it? How come we have so many other problems that weren't solved before the war? - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #149 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote Perhaps you can tell us the ROR for them. I'm not claiming to know that one is better than the other, but seeking to learn how Mr Master seems to know. The links he posted a few pages back might help. You know, I just don't know why I bother sometimes. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #150 October 26, 2006 QuoteQuote well the fact that research on adult stem cells is producing huge benefits and embryonic is producing very little In what proportion to the investment in each? Can you not tell the difference between return and rate of return? It is fact that investment in one has been artificially restricted, to the benefit of the other. Thank you for your investment advice. I'll keep that in mind as I make one of the 15 to 20 trades I make daily. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
