Gravitymaster 0 #1 October 10, 2006 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3GPc_yMCE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gawain 0 #2 October 10, 2006 That's pretty funny. So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites livetofall 0 #3 October 11, 2006 That was funny, but i got pissed off. I have had the name livetofall for 5 years on yahoo, msn, goofball, etc but some fucking bastard liked my name and used it on UTUBE!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Damn this is the first time i ever needed to sign in to watch. I had to see if i actually made an account before and hit send password..no mail.. excuse me ahem....enjoy the videowww.911missinglinks.com the definitive truth of 9/11..the who and why, not how You can handle the TRUTH www.theforbiddentruth.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #4 October 11, 2006 QuoteThat was funny, but i got pissed off. I have had the name livetofall for 5 years on yahoo, msn, goofball, etc but some fucking bastard liked my name and used it on UTUBE!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Damn this is the first time i ever needed to sign in to watch. I had to see if i actually made an account before and hit send password..no mail.. excuse me ahem....enjoy the video It's interesting you bring up having to sign in to view the ad. When I first put the link up, signing in wasn't required. A group of Liberal bloggers demanded it be removed (you know, the party of open-mindedness and free speech) so as a compromise, Youtube reclassified if as "inappropriate" and gave it the same status as video's containing violence. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #5 October 11, 2006 Ok, take ONE MORE look at the video . . . Is it REALLY making fun of the Democrats OR . . . and I guess you have to see this from the right point of view to understand it . . . is it REALLY making fun of the way the GOP tries to blame virtually everything on the Democrats? Jon Stewart the other day asked the question of how the GOP is going to blame the North Korean nuke tests on the Democrats. Looking at this video on YouTube, it seems they already have, but then again . . . I still wonder who it makes looks worse.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #6 October 11, 2006 QuoteOk, take ONE MORE look at the video . . . Is it REALLY making fun of the Democrats OR . . . and I guess you have to see this from the right point of view to understand it . . . is it REALLY making fun of the way the GOP tries to blame virtually everything on the Democrats? Jon Stewart the other day asked the question of how the GOP is going to blame the North Korean nuke tests on the Democrats. Looking at this video on YouTube, it seems they already have, but then again . . . I still wonder who it makes looks worse. Or is it making fun of the way Democrats try to shut the door on the Clinton Admin. responsibilities as of Jan 2001 and claim nothing they did or didn't do before that date has any bearing on today? - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #7 October 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteOk, take ONE MORE look at the video . . . Is it REALLY making fun of the Democrats OR . . . and I guess you have to see this from the right point of view to understand it . . . is it REALLY making fun of the way the GOP tries to blame virtually everything on the Democrats? Jon Stewart the other day asked the question of how the GOP is going to blame the North Korean nuke tests on the Democrats. Looking at this video on YouTube, it seems they already have, but then again . . . I still wonder who it makes looks worse. Or is it making fun of the way Democrats try to shut the door on the Clinton Admin. responsibilities as of Jan 2001 and claim nothing they did or didn't do before that date has any bearing on today? - Oh great. Bring up Bill Clinton. Look! He got a blowjob. She was 22. It's no big deal. Really none of anybodies business. so leave it alone, already. OKAY? And he didn't lie. Okay? So just leave it alone. It's from the last millenium. Ancient history. Okay? And he did everything possible to fight terrorism and capture Osama. That Chris Wallace is such a little weasel. When will you people stop dragging Clinton into everything? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites livendive 8 #8 October 11, 2006 It would ring true, except...http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2473477#2473477 Does anyone else laugh when Bolton and the Administration say that Kim Jong Il is trying to negotiate with threats and intimidation and we're not going to respond to such aggressive tactics? What the fuck do they think we've been doing??! Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites idrankwhat 0 #9 October 11, 2006 Quote Does anyone else laugh when Bolton and the Administration say that Kim Jong Il is trying to negotiate with threats and intimidation and we're not going to respond to such aggressive tactics? What the fuck do they think we've been doing??! Blues, Dave Hey, when Bush comes out and makes speeches about thwarting the will of the international community, you'd better pay attention. He knows what he's talking about Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lawrocket 3 #10 October 11, 2006 QuoteWhen will you people stop dragging Clinton into everything? No reasonable persons drag him into "everything." But, there are several things into which he can be dragged. The spin from the left is that this is the ultimate result of Bush's "Axis of Evil" speech. The Washington Post ran a story blaming the speech for having things come to this, even though the speech was made almost 5 years ago, and but a year after Clinton left office. Remember the agreement that Clinton's admin had where we would send NoKo fuel oil if they stopped enriching uranium? We sent fuel oil, and they didn't stop enriching uranium. Remember 1998 when NoKo tested a missile by firing it over Japan? When NoKo did not allow US inspectors, Clinton rewarded them by offering a couple of hundred million dollars in food. So, NoKo accepted, and allowed the inspectors in, who found nothing - kinda like if the privates get advanced notice that the drill sergeant will be doing an inspection in three hours - they tend to make the place look spotless. Now, FDR can't reasonably be dragged into this. I think Carter is the first one who can - he secured an agreement. But if you think that NoKo's nuclear development has only been going on for less than six years, then you fail to appreciate realities. Like the events of 9/11/01, part of the action occurred Clinton's watch. To deny that is ludicrous. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #11 October 11, 2006 Look, Mr. Lawrocket dude, Appeasement of tyrants does work. I don't have any historical examples of it working... but that doesn't change the fact that it works. My poly-sci prof at Berkeley told me it does and he's got a Ph.D.... so he knows what he's talking about. You should do your homework before spouting off about Clinton and Carter ....... and FDR. blah blah blah blah blah Armed conflict is not the answer. Carter proved that when he boycotted the 1980 Summer Olympics. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,116 #12 October 11, 2006 >Appeasement of tyrants does work. With Pakistan allowing the Taliban safe haven in their country, and with Frist thinking they should be allowed a say in the Afghani government - it's getting more popular. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #13 October 11, 2006 Isn't tongue in cheek, or blatant (either one) much more satisfying than the normal arguments and PAs???? Did you know it's actually GWB's fault for Clinton getting a blow job and lying about it? It has to do with spinach, I forget the tie in. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites idrankwhat 0 #14 October 11, 2006 Quote Like the events of 9/11/01, part of the action occurred Clinton's watch. To deny that is ludicrous. True, and they had people working on the al qaeda threat. The didn't get them but they were at least trying to. The difference is that when it was handed over to the next administration al qaeda was put on the far back burner and Iraq and missile defense were moved to the front. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #15 October 11, 2006 QuoteIsn't tongue in cheek, or blatant (either one) much more satisfying than the normal arguments and PAs???? Did you know it's actually GWB's fault for Clinton getting a blow job and lying about it? It has to do with spinach, I forget the tie in. The tie-in is that we let a dictator get away with this, so that's appeasement, which is what Neville Chamberlain did with Hitler, who liked asparagus, which is a green vegetable like spinach. Therefore, it's like Hitler. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #16 October 11, 2006 Oh I thought it was the whole Popeye - Brutus - overthrow the government - neocon New American Century - Bush doctrine - I am the decider connection. I heard Olive Oyl could make your toes curl. Et tu, Monica? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #17 October 11, 2006 Did Andy just say a blow job is like Hitler???? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites unformed 0 #18 October 11, 2006 QuoteDid Andy just say a blow job is like Hitler???? It's about time people start understanding. God did not give us mouths to suck dicks. Doing so goes against the way of the Lord and perverses sex which is meant to only be used as a tool for procreation. Anything which goes against the way of the Lord, whether it is killing Jews or destroying the sanctity of procreation, is equally horrific. Actually, as Jews became traitors and killed Jesus, they are therefore at a lower status than most of God's children, whereas procreation and the creation of life is the most important thing God offers us, so Hitler's actions were not quite as bad as Clinton getting a blow job ... and furthermore lying about it.This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #19 October 12, 2006 QuoteIt would ring true, except...http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2473477#2473477 Does anyone else laugh when Bolton and the Administration say that Kim Jong Il is trying to negotiate with threats and intimidation and we're not going to respond to such aggressive tactics? What the fuck do they think we've been doing??! Blues, Dave Problem with the article from the WaPo s that it's simply not true. I know you like John McCain. Here's what he said about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puJpRPHnzEk It was agreed that the U.S. would help Pyongyang build two light- water reactors costing $4 billion, after which North Korea would dismantle its other nuclear facilities. Before completion, we were to provide 500,000 metric tons of heavy fuel oil every year. Not surprisingly, much of our aid for energy and food was secretly diverted to the military and to uranium enrichment during the Clinton years. In 1997, we discovered that North Korea had built an underground nuclear facility at Kumchang-ri. The next year, North Korea — surprise, surprise — launched a three-stage Taepodong missile, proving its ability to attack Japan. Clinton responded by having former Defense Secretary William Perry go to Pyongyang to deliver a letter from Clinton. In 2000, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung got the Nobel Peace Prize for his "Sunshine Policy" of engaging with the North. The fact is the U.S., South Korea and Japan have all been fleeced. We've handed a genocidal regime billions of dollars thinking we could bribe it into abandoning nukes. Kim Jong Il showed us what a joke that was. Bush recognized this all along, which is why he won't be taking Carter's self-serving advice to forget the consequences of that disastrous 1994 deal he authored. http://cns.miis.edu/research/korea/nuc/chr9899.htm Edited to add: You can search the entire chronology of the Clinton dealings with N.Korea on the above link going back to 1994. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites livetofall 0 #20 October 12, 2006 QuoteQuoteThat was funny, but i got pissed off. I have had the name livetofall for 5 years on yahoo, msn, goofball, etc but some fucking bastard liked my name and used it on UTUBE!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Damn this is the first time i ever needed to sign in to watch. I had to see if i actually made an account before and hit send password..no mail.. excuse me ahem....enjoy the video It's interesting you bring up having to sign in to view the ad. When I first put the link up, signing in wasn't required. A group of Liberal bloggers demanded it be removed (you know, the party of open-mindedness and free speech) so as a compromise, Youtube reclassified if as "inappropriate" and gave it the same status as video's containing violence. -You are right. I also find it very interesting that there are still all kinds of stuff like the GWB/monkey thing and such, that Bush hasnt had this stuff removed, ya know, being like Hitler and all that jazz, thats just intolerable by a facist dictator.www.911missinglinks.com the definitive truth of 9/11..the who and why, not how You can handle the TRUTH www.theforbiddentruth.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites livetofall 0 #21 October 12, 2006 Andy, spinach is not like asparagus, it doesnt make your pee stink. Nothing like pissing on your wehrmacht officers boots when he screws up..everyone knows.www.911missinglinks.com the definitive truth of 9/11..the who and why, not how You can handle the TRUTH www.theforbiddentruth.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Gawain 0 #2 October 10, 2006 That's pretty funny. So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livetofall 0 #3 October 11, 2006 That was funny, but i got pissed off. I have had the name livetofall for 5 years on yahoo, msn, goofball, etc but some fucking bastard liked my name and used it on UTUBE!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Damn this is the first time i ever needed to sign in to watch. I had to see if i actually made an account before and hit send password..no mail.. excuse me ahem....enjoy the videowww.911missinglinks.com the definitive truth of 9/11..the who and why, not how You can handle the TRUTH www.theforbiddentruth.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #4 October 11, 2006 QuoteThat was funny, but i got pissed off. I have had the name livetofall for 5 years on yahoo, msn, goofball, etc but some fucking bastard liked my name and used it on UTUBE!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Damn this is the first time i ever needed to sign in to watch. I had to see if i actually made an account before and hit send password..no mail.. excuse me ahem....enjoy the video It's interesting you bring up having to sign in to view the ad. When I first put the link up, signing in wasn't required. A group of Liberal bloggers demanded it be removed (you know, the party of open-mindedness and free speech) so as a compromise, Youtube reclassified if as "inappropriate" and gave it the same status as video's containing violence. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #5 October 11, 2006 Ok, take ONE MORE look at the video . . . Is it REALLY making fun of the Democrats OR . . . and I guess you have to see this from the right point of view to understand it . . . is it REALLY making fun of the way the GOP tries to blame virtually everything on the Democrats? Jon Stewart the other day asked the question of how the GOP is going to blame the North Korean nuke tests on the Democrats. Looking at this video on YouTube, it seems they already have, but then again . . . I still wonder who it makes looks worse.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #6 October 11, 2006 QuoteOk, take ONE MORE look at the video . . . Is it REALLY making fun of the Democrats OR . . . and I guess you have to see this from the right point of view to understand it . . . is it REALLY making fun of the way the GOP tries to blame virtually everything on the Democrats? Jon Stewart the other day asked the question of how the GOP is going to blame the North Korean nuke tests on the Democrats. Looking at this video on YouTube, it seems they already have, but then again . . . I still wonder who it makes looks worse. Or is it making fun of the way Democrats try to shut the door on the Clinton Admin. responsibilities as of Jan 2001 and claim nothing they did or didn't do before that date has any bearing on today? - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #7 October 11, 2006 QuoteQuoteOk, take ONE MORE look at the video . . . Is it REALLY making fun of the Democrats OR . . . and I guess you have to see this from the right point of view to understand it . . . is it REALLY making fun of the way the GOP tries to blame virtually everything on the Democrats? Jon Stewart the other day asked the question of how the GOP is going to blame the North Korean nuke tests on the Democrats. Looking at this video on YouTube, it seems they already have, but then again . . . I still wonder who it makes looks worse. Or is it making fun of the way Democrats try to shut the door on the Clinton Admin. responsibilities as of Jan 2001 and claim nothing they did or didn't do before that date has any bearing on today? - Oh great. Bring up Bill Clinton. Look! He got a blowjob. She was 22. It's no big deal. Really none of anybodies business. so leave it alone, already. OKAY? And he didn't lie. Okay? So just leave it alone. It's from the last millenium. Ancient history. Okay? And he did everything possible to fight terrorism and capture Osama. That Chris Wallace is such a little weasel. When will you people stop dragging Clinton into everything? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livendive 8 #8 October 11, 2006 It would ring true, except...http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2473477#2473477 Does anyone else laugh when Bolton and the Administration say that Kim Jong Il is trying to negotiate with threats and intimidation and we're not going to respond to such aggressive tactics? What the fuck do they think we've been doing??! Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #9 October 11, 2006 Quote Does anyone else laugh when Bolton and the Administration say that Kim Jong Il is trying to negotiate with threats and intimidation and we're not going to respond to such aggressive tactics? What the fuck do they think we've been doing??! Blues, Dave Hey, when Bush comes out and makes speeches about thwarting the will of the international community, you'd better pay attention. He knows what he's talking about Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #10 October 11, 2006 QuoteWhen will you people stop dragging Clinton into everything? No reasonable persons drag him into "everything." But, there are several things into which he can be dragged. The spin from the left is that this is the ultimate result of Bush's "Axis of Evil" speech. The Washington Post ran a story blaming the speech for having things come to this, even though the speech was made almost 5 years ago, and but a year after Clinton left office. Remember the agreement that Clinton's admin had where we would send NoKo fuel oil if they stopped enriching uranium? We sent fuel oil, and they didn't stop enriching uranium. Remember 1998 when NoKo tested a missile by firing it over Japan? When NoKo did not allow US inspectors, Clinton rewarded them by offering a couple of hundred million dollars in food. So, NoKo accepted, and allowed the inspectors in, who found nothing - kinda like if the privates get advanced notice that the drill sergeant will be doing an inspection in three hours - they tend to make the place look spotless. Now, FDR can't reasonably be dragged into this. I think Carter is the first one who can - he secured an agreement. But if you think that NoKo's nuclear development has only been going on for less than six years, then you fail to appreciate realities. Like the events of 9/11/01, part of the action occurred Clinton's watch. To deny that is ludicrous. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #11 October 11, 2006 Look, Mr. Lawrocket dude, Appeasement of tyrants does work. I don't have any historical examples of it working... but that doesn't change the fact that it works. My poly-sci prof at Berkeley told me it does and he's got a Ph.D.... so he knows what he's talking about. You should do your homework before spouting off about Clinton and Carter ....... and FDR. blah blah blah blah blah Armed conflict is not the answer. Carter proved that when he boycotted the 1980 Summer Olympics. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #12 October 11, 2006 >Appeasement of tyrants does work. With Pakistan allowing the Taliban safe haven in their country, and with Frist thinking they should be allowed a say in the Afghani government - it's getting more popular. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #13 October 11, 2006 Isn't tongue in cheek, or blatant (either one) much more satisfying than the normal arguments and PAs???? Did you know it's actually GWB's fault for Clinton getting a blow job and lying about it? It has to do with spinach, I forget the tie in. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #14 October 11, 2006 Quote Like the events of 9/11/01, part of the action occurred Clinton's watch. To deny that is ludicrous. True, and they had people working on the al qaeda threat. The didn't get them but they were at least trying to. The difference is that when it was handed over to the next administration al qaeda was put on the far back burner and Iraq and missile defense were moved to the front. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #15 October 11, 2006 QuoteIsn't tongue in cheek, or blatant (either one) much more satisfying than the normal arguments and PAs???? Did you know it's actually GWB's fault for Clinton getting a blow job and lying about it? It has to do with spinach, I forget the tie in. The tie-in is that we let a dictator get away with this, so that's appeasement, which is what Neville Chamberlain did with Hitler, who liked asparagus, which is a green vegetable like spinach. Therefore, it's like Hitler. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #16 October 11, 2006 Oh I thought it was the whole Popeye - Brutus - overthrow the government - neocon New American Century - Bush doctrine - I am the decider connection. I heard Olive Oyl could make your toes curl. Et tu, Monica? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #17 October 11, 2006 Did Andy just say a blow job is like Hitler???? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unformed 0 #18 October 11, 2006 QuoteDid Andy just say a blow job is like Hitler???? It's about time people start understanding. God did not give us mouths to suck dicks. Doing so goes against the way of the Lord and perverses sex which is meant to only be used as a tool for procreation. Anything which goes against the way of the Lord, whether it is killing Jews or destroying the sanctity of procreation, is equally horrific. Actually, as Jews became traitors and killed Jesus, they are therefore at a lower status than most of God's children, whereas procreation and the creation of life is the most important thing God offers us, so Hitler's actions were not quite as bad as Clinton getting a blow job ... and furthermore lying about it.This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #19 October 12, 2006 QuoteIt would ring true, except...http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2473477#2473477 Does anyone else laugh when Bolton and the Administration say that Kim Jong Il is trying to negotiate with threats and intimidation and we're not going to respond to such aggressive tactics? What the fuck do they think we've been doing??! Blues, Dave Problem with the article from the WaPo s that it's simply not true. I know you like John McCain. Here's what he said about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puJpRPHnzEk It was agreed that the U.S. would help Pyongyang build two light- water reactors costing $4 billion, after which North Korea would dismantle its other nuclear facilities. Before completion, we were to provide 500,000 metric tons of heavy fuel oil every year. Not surprisingly, much of our aid for energy and food was secretly diverted to the military and to uranium enrichment during the Clinton years. In 1997, we discovered that North Korea had built an underground nuclear facility at Kumchang-ri. The next year, North Korea — surprise, surprise — launched a three-stage Taepodong missile, proving its ability to attack Japan. Clinton responded by having former Defense Secretary William Perry go to Pyongyang to deliver a letter from Clinton. In 2000, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung got the Nobel Peace Prize for his "Sunshine Policy" of engaging with the North. The fact is the U.S., South Korea and Japan have all been fleeced. We've handed a genocidal regime billions of dollars thinking we could bribe it into abandoning nukes. Kim Jong Il showed us what a joke that was. Bush recognized this all along, which is why he won't be taking Carter's self-serving advice to forget the consequences of that disastrous 1994 deal he authored. http://cns.miis.edu/research/korea/nuc/chr9899.htm Edited to add: You can search the entire chronology of the Clinton dealings with N.Korea on the above link going back to 1994. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livetofall 0 #20 October 12, 2006 QuoteQuoteThat was funny, but i got pissed off. I have had the name livetofall for 5 years on yahoo, msn, goofball, etc but some fucking bastard liked my name and used it on UTUBE!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Damn this is the first time i ever needed to sign in to watch. I had to see if i actually made an account before and hit send password..no mail.. excuse me ahem....enjoy the video It's interesting you bring up having to sign in to view the ad. When I first put the link up, signing in wasn't required. A group of Liberal bloggers demanded it be removed (you know, the party of open-mindedness and free speech) so as a compromise, Youtube reclassified if as "inappropriate" and gave it the same status as video's containing violence. -You are right. I also find it very interesting that there are still all kinds of stuff like the GWB/monkey thing and such, that Bush hasnt had this stuff removed, ya know, being like Hitler and all that jazz, thats just intolerable by a facist dictator.www.911missinglinks.com the definitive truth of 9/11..the who and why, not how You can handle the TRUTH www.theforbiddentruth.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livetofall 0 #21 October 12, 2006 Andy, spinach is not like asparagus, it doesnt make your pee stink. Nothing like pissing on your wehrmacht officers boots when he screws up..everyone knows.www.911missinglinks.com the definitive truth of 9/11..the who and why, not how You can handle the TRUTH www.theforbiddentruth.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
