Clinton's formal policy for regime change in Iraq

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Then aswner the question rush. Or admit you don't know (or maybe care).

What is the official straegy for Iraq? What would be considered a victory?

Your countrymen and women are dying in droves, don't you think they have a right to know what they are dying for?

Dying in droves
I do know the official straegy in Iraq. I know what will be considered a victory. Bush has stated what has to happen for both.

Your problem is unless the "official" strategy includes a date we are leaving then it is bogus.

I await your "you don't know do you" talking piont responce.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,150]

Quote

Your countrymen and women are dying in droves, don't you think they have a right to know what they are dying for?

2,737 so far, 23 in the last 5 days, in support of a falsehood.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

I do know the official straegy in Iraq. I know what will be considered a victory. Bush has stated what has to happen for both.

Your problem is unless the "official" strategy includes a date we are leaving then it is bogus.

I have never said there has to be a date.

I don't know what the oficially stated strategy is. I certainly can't find it on a government website. If you know, please tell me.

[idrankwhat 0]

Quote

Quote

I do know the official straegy in Iraq. I know what will be considered a victory. Bush has stated what has to happen for both.

Your problem is unless the "official" strategy includes a date we are leaving then it is bogus.

I have never said there has to be a date.

I don't know what the oficially stated strategy is. I certainly can't find it on a government website. If you know, please tell me.

Here's one from a "lefty" website. But since "lefty's" just want to "cut and run" and "don't have any ideas" I'm sure that the right won't have anything to do with it.
http://www.americanprogress.org/kf/strategic_redeployment_2.0.pdf

[kallend 2,150]

To bring the topic back to the thread title:

Working for regime change does not have to involve military invasion.

US Presidents from Truman to BushI supported regime change in the former USSR, but none invaded the USSR.

I believe we still support regime change in Iran and North Korea too. Wanna invade?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.