Recommended Posts
rushmc 23
Quote>And in the course of doing so endagered children for a politcal gotcha.
Which children were endangered by anyone other than Foley?
>Who would be the scum in this case?
Foley.
Nicely avoided

I guess the ends justify the means.
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 23
Quote>And in the course of doing so endagered children for a politcal gotcha.
Which children were endangered by anyone other than Foley?
>Who would be the scum in this case?
Foley.
But maybe I have to spell it out for you though.
Lets make it close to home.
You find documentation in 2003 that I am abusing children. You know I am up for election in 2006 so you hold on to the docs until such time as you can get the max impact from the releas of those documents.
Are you a crook?
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
billvon 3,110
What "means?" You keep saying "kids were endangered." Who, other than Foley, endangered which kids?
This is turning into one of those "but what about the CHILDREN? Please, won't someone think of the CHILDREN!" conversations.
rushmc 23
Quote>I guess the ends justify the means.
What "means?" You keep saying "kids were endangered." Who, other than Foley, endangered which kids?
This is turning into one of those "but what about the CHILDREN? Please, won't someone think of the CHILDREN!" conversations.
By the SOB who had the docs three years ago and allowed Foley to keep on being scum with pages!! If those same docs had been relased three years ago then he would have been stopped three years ago!!!
And all for a polital gotcha?

You alright with that?
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
QuoteQuote>And in the course of doing so endagered children for a politcal gotcha.
Which children were endangered by anyone other than Foley?
>Who would be the scum in this case?
Foley.
But maybe I have to spell it out for you though.
Lets make it close to home.
You find documentation in 2003 that I am abusing children. You know I am up for election in 2006 so you hold on to the docs until such time as you can get the max impact from the releas of those documents.
Are you a crook?
YES.
(edit to add: I am not actually a crook, but agree that one that withholds evidence of a felony crime, is himself a criminal)
billvon 3,110
>on being scum with pages!!
You mean Hastert, Reynolds, Alexander, Shimkus and Boehner? They are the only people in the House who have admitted to having information concerning Foley's indiscretions before he resigned.
Or do you mean the people who actually turned over the records of the emails/IM's? Those were the pages themselves; they turned over the records to a blog entitled "Stop Sex Predators." (Surely you are not calling the pages scum!)
DaVinci 0
QuoteDennis Hastert, the Speaker of the House, was informed of Foley's inappropriate emails/electronic messages about a year ago and took no definitive action.
Well the story is that the things he knew about where weird, but not at the level of the things we now know. This jerk should face time. I would be interested to know who, knew what, when. If the Republicans knew and tried to keep it quiet. Shame on them. If the Democrats knew and waited till it would do more damage for political reasons, shame on them. In truth, it is possibly both. Either way this guy (asshat) should go to jail.
sundevil777 102
Quote>By the SOB who had the docs three years ago alowing Foley to keep
>on being scum with pages!!
You mean Hastert, Reynolds, Alexander, Shimkus and Boehner? They are the only people in the House who have admitted to having information concerning Foley's indiscretions before he resigned.
Or do you mean the people who actually turned over the records of the emails/IM's? Those were the pages themselves; they turned over the records to a blog entitled "Stop Sex Predators." (Surely you are not calling the pages scum!)
You seem very quick to assume only repubs knew.
Which children were endangered by anyone other than Foley?
>Who would be the scum in this case?
Foley.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites