0
kallend

Senate Intelligence Report will make interesting reading

Recommended Posts

[INSERT "MISLEADING" QUOTES FROM EVERYONE IN GOV'T ABOUT SADDAM'S THREAT AND WMD'S]

Then blame Bush for personally starting the war in Iraq completely in a vacuum where everyone in the whole world just KNEW that Saddam wasn't a threat or didn't have the WMD's he claimed to.
Oh, hello again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just wish we had some thing NEW.

I know most all this "news" is coming out due to the upcoming elections but jees how long are we gonna use old stuff?

Oh shit, never mind, two opposing politicians just used Pearl Harbor as an example and tried to blame each others Grand Parents.
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

BBbbbwwwwhhhhaaaaaaa


Here we go again:S



I bet Newsmax is a far better source of info than the US Senate, right?



Ooooooo, we go to the NewsMax line because we don't have anything else huh??:o:P

Just the same old recyle the (same) story for political advantage:D:D:D

The desperation is dam funny.......
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the article you link to is missing the best bit. It's being widely reported in the news on this side of the pond that the committee report indicates once and for all that the CIA believed there was NO link between Iraq and Al Qaeda before the invasion.

You gotta wonder who in the hell Bush was listening to when he put it about before the war that the two were linked because we now know for sure that his actual military advisers were telling him there was absolpositively no link.

:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe you need to read page 125 of the document (128 of the pdf).

I am looking to where this states Bush mislead?


Did you even read this or just look at the political spin masters comments in the drive by media?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Maybe you need to read page 125 of the document (128 of the pdf).

I am looking to where this states Bush mislead?


Did you even read this or just look at the political spin masters comments in the drive by media?



It WAS authored primarily by Republicans, and you omitted >100 pages of damning evidence.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think the article you link to is missing the best bit. It's being widely reported in the news on this side of the pond that the committee report indicates once and for all that the CIA believed there was NO link between Iraq and Al Qaeda before the invasion.

You gotta wonder who in the hell Bush was listening to when he put it about before the war that the two were linked because we now know for sure that his actual military advisers were telling him there was absolpositively no link.

:S



Don't you know? He was listening to Jeeesus!

I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You have seen the 100 pages of daming evidence?:o

:D:D:D:D



I have read the reports.

They contain nothing we didn't already know concerning the selective use of intel by the White House, the statements originating in the White House with no basis in any of the intel , and the outright lies from the White House. However, these reports do document the damning evidence with source references, dates, etc. and compile it all into a convenient package with the imprimatur of an authoritative body behind it.

I realize that you will now scramble to find snippets here and there supporting the positions you have taken over the years, but on the whole your positions are totally undermined.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Maybe you need to read page 125 of the document (128 of the pdf).

I am looking to where this states Bush mislead?


Did you even read this or just look at the political spin masters comments in the drive by media?



It WAS authored primarily by Republicans, and you omitted >100 pages of damning evidence.


_______________________________

Speaking of damning evidence. I have a question. Why, do politicians tape record phone conversations, off-the record statements and the like then, the damned tapes get-out into the public and the politicians have to make big public apologies so they hopefully don't lose votes. Why the hell, do they record that stuff in the first place. The Governator seems really prone to this type thing.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You have seen the 100 pages of daming evidence?:o

:D:D:D:D



I have read the reports.

They contain nothing we didn't already know concerning the selective use of intel by the White House, the statements originating in the White House with no basis in any of the intel , and the outright lies from the White House. However, these reports do document the damning evidence with source references, dates, etc. and compile it all into a convenient package with the imprimatur of an authoritative body behind it.

I realize that you will now scramble to find snippets here and there supporting the positions you have taken over the years, but on the whole your positions are totally undermined.



:D:D\
Having bad intel and taking it to where you would like this to go is funny to watch.

Snippets, I read the whole thing. It is easy to see who is doing the spinning here
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

You have seen the 100 pages of daming evidence?:o

:D:D:D:D



I have read the reports.

They contain nothing we didn't already know concerning the selective use of intel by the White House, the statements originating in the White House with no basis in any of the intel , and the outright lies from the White House. However, these reports do document the damning evidence with source references, dates, etc. and compile it all into a convenient package with the imprimatur of an authoritative body behind it.

I realize that you will now scramble to find snippets here and there supporting the positions you have taken over the years, but on the whole your positions are totally undermined.



:D:D\
Having bad intel and taking it to where you would like this to go is funny to watch.

Snippets, I read the whole thing. It is easy to see who is doing the spinning here



Very droll.

Read the bits about the CIA telling the President that there was no link between AQ and SH, BEFORE he went on TV. Who, when, all documented.

Read the bits about the Air Force telling the Pres that Iraq's UAVs were just for surveillance, BEFORE he made his speech claiming they could attack the US in 45 minutes.


You could make a living as a comedian.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Read the bits about the CIA telling the President that there was no
>link between AQ and SH, BEFORE he went on TV.

"One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror" - GWB, 9/6/206

Claim that 9/11 is connected to Iraq, and you solve that problem neatly.

--------------------
Consistent with section 3(b) of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), and based on information available to me, including that in the enclosed document, I determine that . . .acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. (GWB 3/18/2003)

--------------------
Problem with that comes when you change your mind.

"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th" (GWB 9/18/2003)
------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you watch Cheney with Russert Sunday?
Counters and answerer all of your mis-leading/incorrect assesments/statement/lies.

Same song second vers and your position is still wrong. Hatred blinds you like that you know!!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0