racer42 0 #26 September 7, 2006 Wouldn't this be a whole lot cheaper ? http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/FASubType?type=Rifle&subtype=Autoloading And this http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/FASubType?type=Rifle&subtype=Single%20Shot a whole lot more challenging? I mean come on 218 Bee to .458 Win Mag!!L.A.S.T. #24 Co-Founder Biscuit Brothers Freefly Team Electric Toaster #3 Co-Founder Team Non Sequitor Co-Founder Team Happy Sock Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craddock 0 #27 September 7, 2006 If your just looking for a 1 moa gun and are trying to keep costs down for glass why not just go with a RRA Varmint? They are guaranteed to shoot sub 1 moa(I believe they guarantee 3/4?) and some will do much better. You can pick one up for around $900. Throw on some good mounts and a Bushnell Elite 4200 scope and you are shooting without dropping a fortune. I don't own a high end scope and never have. I have owned many mid level scopes like the Leupold Vari-X III which is now a VXII. They have made some improvements to that scope which is now the VXIII. Nice scopes. For my money though in the $500 range I will take the Bushnell Elite 4200 all day long. They make a 3200 also which is cheaper and still a much nicer scope IMO than a Vari-X II. The Leupolds have a bit more eye relief which can be a factor shooting large magnum calibers but is not an issue on 5.56 or .223 That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
