0
rwieder

Andrea Yates...........

Recommended Posts

Quote

Not guilty by reason of insanity.

I'm officially P.O. >:(



Does anyone truly believe she is not nuts? I'm not saying she doesn't deserve the death penalty, but she had to be completely whacked out of her mind and will almost certainly spend the rest of her life in an institution.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The bitch knew what she was doing. I'm watching her lawyer hugging other peoplw and smiling at his victory. She should've recieved the death penalty. She was lucid in court when the verdict was read.
-Richard-
"You're Holding The Rope And I'm Taking The Fall"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The bitch knew what she was doing. I'm watching her lawyer hugging other peoplw and smiling at his victory. She should've recieved the death penalty. She was lucid in court when the verdict was read.



No she did not. You are just speaking out of anger!

What she did was not right, but try and read about her history.

http://crime.about.com/od/current/p/andreayates.htm
-----------------
I love and Miss you so much Honey!
Orfun #3 ~ Darla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
She was completely certifiable wacko at the time.

She'd just been taken off a MAJOR anti-psychotic drug (called St. Haldol by emergency rooms that use it to stop major psychotic breaks in the ER) shortly before the incident. Not by her doctor, but by her husband. She did have help at home, but not all the time.

It was not right. But she was definitely wacko.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No she did not. You are just speaking out of anger!



I beg to differ. 100 years ago justice would have been swift and insanity would never have been brought up. She would have been sent to the gallows straight away. Dumb, Stupid or slow, murder is murder and should be paid for in kind.
-Richard-
"You're Holding The Rope And I'm Taking The Fall"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I beg to differ. 100 years ago justice would have been swift and insanity would never have been brought up. She would have been sent to the gallows straight away. Dumb, Stupid or slow, murder is murder and should be paid for in kind.


100 years ago, mental illness was thought to have been caused by evil spirits, too, and it was often the case that someone had a family member chained to the basement floor.

Sigh.

I am very, very proud of the Tx jury. They worked hard, came to the correct decision, and Andrea will be in a mental facility for the rest of her life.

Huge win for mental health, no doubt or question. Huge, huge win. Thank God.

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The bitch knew what she was doing...[snip]... She was lucid in court when the verdict was read.


She's lucid now (and I'd disagree somewhat on "lucid", however), but that's because she's had years of medical intervention behind her. How she looks and behaves now does not have any bearing on what was happening to her at the time of the crimes 5 years ago.

Those poor children. I am so sorry they died, and were murdered at the hands of their mother. But she was a very, very, sick woman and not responsible for her actions. I can have sympathy for both mother and children...and I do.

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

No she did not. You are just speaking out of anger!



I beg to differ. 100 years ago justice would have been swift and insanity would never have been brought up. She would have been sent to the gallows straight away. Dumb, Stupid or slow, murder is murder and should be paid for in kind.



So are you saying that we should go back in time and and act like ignorant savages? There is reason why the system changes......it is called learning from experiences. There was a reason why not guilty by reason of insanity was established. The person was unable to know right from wrong.

So if a child who is one year old killed someone, they are entitled to the death penalty?
-----------------
I love and Miss you so much Honey!
Orfun #3 ~ Darla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately our justice system has become a joke. Every one has an excuse. I mean does any one just kill a person as calmly as they read a book. So everyone is temporary in sane or fully in sane or what ever.

She killed 5 kids she should be killed simple as that.
What was really sad was the woman movement who came to her defense by sighting depression, ok she was depressed I am feeling kind of down this week who can I kill?
If she was so insane why was she not put in a mental hospital before she killed her kids one by one. Let me guess she all of a sudden went over the edge.

People for get about the children who had the potential to be any thing. Maybe one of them would have found the cure to cancer maybe not. What scary is people run to save this psycho forget about the kids she murdered.

I wonder what the out come would have been if the murderer was a male? I doubt he could say sorry he was depressed.
I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The bitch knew what she was doing...[snip]... She was lucid in court when the verdict was read.


She's lucid now (and I'd disagree somewhat on "lucid", however), but that's because she's had years of medical intervention behind her. How she looks and behaves now does not have any bearing on what was happening to her at the time of the crimes 5 years ago.

Those poor children. I am so sorry they died, and were murdered at the hands of their mother. But she was a very, very, sick nd not responsible for her actions. I can have sympathy for both mother and children...and I do.

Ciels-
Michele



I have to disagree with you, I think that regardless of your condition you are always responsible for your actions. Drunk, Sober, Lucid, or not. you have to be held accountable for your actions. To say that an adult shouldn't be is ridiculous. Thats part of being an adult and certainly part of being a parent.
Yeah...You need to grow up. -Skymama

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Thats part of being an adult and certainly part of being a parent.

Some people do not have the mental capacity to be an adult. You would not execute a Down-syndrome man for blundering onto a road and causing an accident that killed a family, would you? Or a Down-syndrome woman who throws a dinner plate at her caretaker, killing her?

Unfortunately, it takes only a working set of reproductive organs, and not a brain, to become a parent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



She killed 5 kids she should be killed simple as that.



Ok, it is not as simple as that. Things don't happen in black and white.

A women that you have known most of your life and has really never done anything bad in her life, all of a sudden kills someone. Would you not have it in the back of your mind, "damn what went wrong?" You proabably will not think to kill her right away without knowing the facts and or what was mentally wrong with her.


What was really sad was the woman movement who came to her defense by sighting depression, ok she was depressed I am feeling kind of down this week who can I kill?



Yes, because that was Andrea's case. :S She was just all of a sudden depressed. Come on, do little research. She had massive mental problems a long time ago, especially when a doctor told her husband that she should not have more kids. He didn't like hearing that and took her off the medication.

Think about this, Texas is one of the hardest states to get a insanity plea. She got it.
I am not saying that she was right in killing her poor children, but there was somehting not right with her.
Killing her is not the answer and will not solve anything, or bring those poor kids back.

NO SANE MOTHER WOULD KILL HER KIDS!
-----------------
I love and Miss you so much Honey!
Orfun #3 ~ Darla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Thats part of being an adult and certainly part of being a parent.

Some people do not have the mental capacity to be an adult. You would not execute a Down-syndrome man for blundering onto a road and causing an accident that killed a family, would you?



No, but if a down-syndrome individual willfully killed an individual, then a trial and appropriate action thereafter would be warranted.

Yates was hardly an "accident". It wasn't a car wreck.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> but if a down-syndrome individual willfully killed an individual, then a
>trial and appropriate action thereafter would be warranted.

I agree - but "appropriate action" for someone who is not responsible for their own actions is institutionalization and/or 24/7 care, not a prison sentence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

No she did not. You are just speaking out of anger!



I beg to differ. 100 years ago justice would have been swift and insanity would never have been brought up. She would have been sent to the gallows straight away. Dumb, Stupid or slow, murder is murder and should be paid for in kind.



you have some serious issues with the difference between "Justice" and "Revenge"
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


What was really sad was the woman movement who came to her defense by sighting depression, ok she was depressed I am feeling kind of down this week who can I kill?
If she was so insane why was she not put in a mental hospital before she killed her kids one by one. Let me guess she all of a sudden went over the edge.



To give you some idea of where I'm coming from with this, I'm working for a criminal prosecution office. It's the job of my office, and my job to help, to put criminals in jail.

That said...

First off, Andrea Yates had Post Partum PSYCHOSIS, not Post Partum Depression. There is a massive difference between the two.

With PPP, you are insane. "Postpartum psychosis is a form of depression so severe that the patient loses touch with reality. Although only about 1 in 500 women will get postpartum psychosis, there is a sevenfold increase in the risk of psychiatric hospitalization within the first three months after delivery, and the risk of psychosis is 20 times higher than the pre-pregnancy rate.

When delusions or hallucinations are present, they often involve the infant. A woman may have thoughts that the baby is possessed by a demon and should die. She may even hear voices (auditory hallucinations) telling her to kill her infant. This is an emergency situation, and in such cases a new mother should be taken to the hospital immediately."-healthybaby.com

Andrea Yates had a long history of mental illness and had a history of post-partum depression, which made her much more likely to get PPP. She twice attempted suicide, had been hospitalized four times for psychiatric care and nursed a psychosis before the drownings that was clearly documented in thousands of pages of medical records. -time.com

Someone with PPP who is off their meds is as dangerous, if not more so, than a paranoid schizophrenic off meds. They have no idea what's real and what isn't, delusions come on strongly and suddenly, and there is an incredible compulsion to act on those delusions. The delusions are almost always centered around the child or children.

Andrea Yates was classic PPP. She is the kind of person that an insanity defense is made for. To be "not guilty by reason of insanity", "at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused must be labouring under such a defect of reason, arising from a disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know what he was doing was wrong." -M'Naghten

This defense is based on a principle that punishment is only reasonable if the defendant is capable of distinguishing right and wrong and has some idea of what they're doing. In most jurisdictions, a jury must find that the defendant was in an "active state of psychosis" to accept an insanity defense. By all accounts, Andrea Yates was completely nuts and was given an anti-psychotic cocktail after her arrest.

Defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity are generally placed in a mental institution. Unlike defendants who are found guilty of a crime, they are not institutionalized for a fixed period, but rather they are held within the institution until authorities determine that they are no longer a threat. Authorities making this decision tend to be cautious; as a result, defendants can often spend more time there than they would have in prison (had they been convicted). -wikipedia

Insanity defenses are successful less than 1% of the time. It's not easy to convince a jury that you were so nuts that you didn't know what you were doing, or that it was wrong. It's obviously not easy to convince you either, Darius. However, you were not in the courtroom, you do not have access to the evidence that the jury did, and you do not have the understanding of PPP that the experts gave the jury. Andrea Yates didn't just have to convince one person. She had to convince all twelve. Every single juror had to agree that this woman was nuts. Look at the breakdown of this thread... we've got a pretty good mix of society here. How difficult do you think it would be to get twelve people to agree to find someone who killed five kids "not guilty"??

I applaud the jury in this case. Their decision wasn't easy, but I feel it was the only choice that truly meant justice rather than vengeance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have to disagree with you, I think that regardless of your condition you are always responsible for your actions. Drunk, Sober, Lucid, or not. you have to be held accountable for your actions. To say that an adult shouldn't be is ridiculous. Thats part of being an adult and certainly part of being a parent.


I agree - if you are sane, whatever choices you make you must be responsible for. End of discussion.

However...we are dealing with mental illness. A disease that is as real - and as lethal - as cancer. A disease which isn't about responsibility nor choice. It's a disease which strikes the brain, specifically one's ability to think "normally" and which changes reality. It's like living in a Stephen King novel - and it's real.

Sometimes, when you are hearing voices, you really do hear them. Sometimes, when you're on medication, you really do need it. Sometimes, when you come off those medications, the lethality of your illness is greater than it was before.

Post partum psychosis is real. It's psychotic behavior. Psychotic behavior includes, sometimes, behavior which is not understandable from someone who has not experienced a psychotic break.

It really, really sucks that 5 children are dead. It sucks so fucking much that the insurance "ran out" and that her husband didn't understand - or pay attention to - the illness which affected his wife and threatened the children. It sucks so fucking much that Andrea had an illness which allowed a different reality to prevail...5 children are dead. Killed in a horrific manner, and in a way I would wish on not one person.

And Andrea was - and remains - a critically ill woman. Thank God a jury had enough sense to understand that mental illness is real. Thank God a jury found her NGRI...and that she will spend either the rest of her life or at least most of it in a fine mental facility such as Rusk in east Texas. Thank God...this tragedy could've been avoided - with proper medical care and understanding of the illness from her husband and friends...and a little commitment from them to Andrea.

And it just sucks. There is no happy ending here...none at all. But it's the best ending possible given the circumstances, and for that, I say again "Thank God!".

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0