0
Skyrad

Christian and Gay?

Recommended Posts

Quote

Now you just have to post that same link a few dozen more times.:P:D



How's this...

*** when are you ALL goingto realize 'hairyjuan' was a KNOWN MYTH 1900 years ago. PROVEN BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT ***

Read this and you will have no more doubt.
If you're scared to, it just proves my point.
YOu're all weak!!! Worthless and weak!!! B|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So you don't subscribe to the born that way argument?

I can't prove it ,but I am a fairly observant person.
Back when I was in high school there was only one "sissy" boy. He was raised by a single mother.
Today, there seem to be thousands. There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. I call them Man haters.
They truly despise manliness or machisimo. Some of us just have it running through our blood.
They make every effort to eliminate such behavior from their male offspring. Thus the effiminization of America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Today, there seem to be thousands. There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. I call them Man haters.
They truly despise manliness or machisimo. Some of us just have it running through our blood.
They make every effort to eliminate such behavior from their male offspring. Thus the effiminization of America.



You're claiming that a few women are changing the entire fabric of the country by teaching their sons to be gentle? All that power...wow. :S
Owned by Remi #?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

So you don't subscribe to the born that way argument?

I can't prove it ,but I am a fairly observant person.
Back when I was in high school there was only one "sissy" boy. He was raised by a single mother.
Today, there seem to be thousands. There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. I call them Man haters.
They truly despise manliness or machisimo. Some of us just have it running through our blood.
They make every effort to eliminate such behavior from their male offspring. Thus the effiminization of America.



Quote

There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor.



Why do they think that? Is it because of the way men have allowed themselves to be less than manly and have also thrown chilvery and being a gentleman into the no longer required trash basket?
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You're claiming that a few women are changing the entire fabric of the country by teaching their sons to be gentle? All that power...wow.

A few women? NOW is no small orginization. Their agenda is political and radical.

I can tell you that eliminating competitive and sometimes, slightly rough games from a school yard wasn't the idea of a real man.

Even the game of tag is being questioned because someone might get hurt running around. Also, once you get tagged, you're out of the game. This might lead to low self esteem.

I thought that the betterment of the species through competition was a good thing. Right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I thought that the betterment of the species through competition was a good thing. Right?



You're asking me? Okay then... no, it's not necessary any more. I don't see where human competition is going to make the species any better. Cooperation might help a lot more.

As far as NOW being big and powerful just do a little math. They clam half a million members. That's not even 1 percent of the adult population of America. You really think they're that powerful?

Enough of this argument for me. I know that "real men" don't change their opinions so I'm not going to waste my time with it.
Owned by Remi #?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I thought that the betterment of the species through competition
>was a good thing. Right?

You really willing to let a sick relative die? Because that's how evolution works. "The betterment of the species" doesn't happen because competition makes us stronger. It happens because competition kills the weaker off, and the pool of people remaining is, on average, stronger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0