bch7773 0 #26 July 20, 2006 sure you can be gay and christian. you can also be an adulterer and christian, or a thief and christian. Being gay is no different from any of the sins that hetrosexuals do. MB 3528, RB 1182 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #27 July 20, 2006 >All people calling themselves Christian should be celibate, except for >those in marriage. Then most people in the US who call themselves Christian have no right to do that! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #28 July 20, 2006 It's not really the same without a hairyjuan post. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #29 July 20, 2006 QuoteIt's not really the same without a hairyjuan post. Were they banned?When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nightingale 0 #30 July 20, 2006 QuoteQuoteIt's not really the same without a hairyjuan post. Were they banned? Unfortunately not. He's off trolling in the "Not a Christian" thread. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,610 #31 July 20, 2006 Now His name has been invoked I have faith that He will arrive to anoint the thread.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windcatcher 0 #33 July 20, 2006 No Christian is perfect---we all continue to sin. However, we have the choice to NOT sin, and we cannot go on deliberately sinning if we are children of God. Mother to the cutest little thing in the world... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #34 July 20, 2006 Now you just have to post that same link a few dozen more times. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #35 July 20, 2006 QuoteNow you just have to post that same link a few dozen more times. How's this... *** when are you ALL goingto realize 'hairyjuan' was a KNOWN MYTH 1900 years ago. PROVEN BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT *** Read this and you will have no more doubt. If you're scared to, it just proves my point. YOu're all weak!!! Worthless and weak!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #36 July 21, 2006 Come on.... That was funny... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #37 July 21, 2006 QuoteSo you don't subscribe to the born that way argument? I can't prove it ,but I am a fairly observant person. Back when I was in high school there was only one "sissy" boy. He was raised by a single mother. Today, there seem to be thousands. There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. I call them Man haters. They truly despise manliness or machisimo. Some of us just have it running through our blood. They make every effort to eliminate such behavior from their male offspring. Thus the effiminization of America. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #38 July 21, 2006 > Some of us just have it running through our blood. And some have homosexuality "running through their blood." It is as wrong to try to make them hetero as would be to 'effeminize' you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #39 July 21, 2006 BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
labrys 0 #40 July 21, 2006 QuoteToday, there seem to be thousands. There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. I call them Man haters. They truly despise manliness or machisimo. Some of us just have it running through our blood. They make every effort to eliminate such behavior from their male offspring. Thus the effiminization of America. You're claiming that a few women are changing the entire fabric of the country by teaching their sons to be gentle? All that power...wow. Owned by Remi #? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #41 July 21, 2006 QuoteQuoteSo you don't subscribe to the born that way argument? I can't prove it ,but I am a fairly observant person. Back when I was in high school there was only one "sissy" boy. He was raised by a single mother. Today, there seem to be thousands. There also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. I call them Man haters. They truly despise manliness or machisimo. Some of us just have it running through our blood. They make every effort to eliminate such behavior from their male offspring. Thus the effiminization of America. QuoteThere also seems to be a rise in the number of women who only believe a man is good for a seed donor. Why do they think that? Is it because of the way men have allowed themselves to be less than manly and have also thrown chilvery and being a gentleman into the no longer required trash basket?When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #42 July 21, 2006 QuoteYou're claiming that a few women are changing the entire fabric of the country by teaching their sons to be gentle? All that power...wow.A few women? NOW is no small orginization. Their agenda is political and radical. I can tell you that eliminating competitive and sometimes, slightly rough games from a school yard wasn't the idea of a real man. Even the game of tag is being questioned because someone might get hurt running around. Also, once you get tagged, you're out of the game. This might lead to low self esteem. I thought that the betterment of the species through competition was a good thing. Right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #43 July 21, 2006 QuoteBWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Thanks man! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
labrys 0 #44 July 21, 2006 QuoteI thought that the betterment of the species through competition was a good thing. Right? You're asking me? Okay then... no, it's not necessary any more. I don't see where human competition is going to make the species any better. Cooperation might help a lot more. As far as NOW being big and powerful just do a little math. They clam half a million members. That's not even 1 percent of the adult population of America. You really think they're that powerful? Enough of this argument for me. I know that "real men" don't change their opinions so I'm not going to waste my time with it.Owned by Remi #? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #45 July 21, 2006 >I thought that the betterment of the species through competition >was a good thing. Right? You really willing to let a sick relative die? Because that's how evolution works. "The betterment of the species" doesn't happen because competition makes us stronger. It happens because competition kills the weaker off, and the pool of people remaining is, on average, stronger. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites