bodypilot90 0 #1 June 23, 2006 Quote"I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy," 12-3-03 Kerry on the war maybe he was looking in the mirror....... http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/04/elec04.prez.democrats.kerry/ __________________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #2 June 23, 2006 QuoteQuote"I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy," 12-3-03 Kerry on the war maybe he was looking in the mirror....... http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/04/elec04.prez.democrats.kerry/ __________________________________________________ "NEW YORK (CNN) -- Presidential candidate John Kerry Wednesday attacked President Bush's foreign policy, calling it "arrogant, inept, and reckless," So, at least he got that bit right.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #3 June 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote"I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy," 12-3-03 Kerry on the war maybe he was looking in the mirror....... http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/04/elec04.prez.democrats.kerry/ __________________________________________________ "NEW YORK (CNN) -- Presidential candidate John Kerry Wednesday attacked President Bush's foreign policy, calling it "arrogant, inept, and reckless," So, at least he got that bit right. Like Bodypilot said.... he was looking in the mirror. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #4 June 23, 2006 QuotePresidential candidate John Kerry Wednesday attacked President Bush's foreign policy, calling it "arrogant, inept, and reckless," So, at least he got that bit right. So how come he only got 13 votes in the Senate for his cut-and-run strategy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #5 June 23, 2006 QuoteQuotePresidential candidate John Kerry Wednesday attacked President Bush's foreign policy, calling it "arrogant, inept, and reckless," So, at least he got that bit right. So how come he only got 13 votes in the Senate for his cut-and-run strategy? Nice to see the Dems standing by their convictions, huh? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #6 June 24, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuotePresidential candidate John Kerry Wednesday attacked President Bush's foreign policy, calling it "arrogant, inept, and reckless," So, at least he got that bit right. So how come he only got 13 votes in the Senate for his cut-and-run strategy? Nice to see the Dems standing by their convictions, huh? When is the sentencing??"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #7 June 25, 2006 Quotearrogant, inept, and reckless, that's Kerry in a nutshell. __________________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #8 June 25, 2006 QuoteQuotearrogant, inept, and reckless, that's Kerry in a nutshell. __________________________________________________ Are you still posting stuff you know to be untrue, just for your amusement?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #9 June 25, 2006 It's true, he's the dems worst nightmare. Maybe he'll get the '08 ticket with Billary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #10 June 25, 2006 Quote It's true, he's the dems worst nightmare. Maybe he'll get the '08 ticket with Billary. After that bill he proposed that got squashed, you can all but guarantee that he won't be invited to speak on anyone's campaign, it would be a kiss of death.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #11 June 26, 2006 > arrogant, inept, and reckless, Dem's political party platform for 2008. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #12 June 26, 2006 >the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy . . . "WASHINGTON, June 24 — The top American commander in Iraq has drafted a plan that projects sharp reductions in the United States military presence there by the end of 2007, with the first cuts coming this September, American officials say. According to a classified briefing at the Pentagon this week by the commander, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the number of American combat brigades in Iraq is projected to decrease to 5 or 6 from the current level of 14 by December 2007." Looks like he was right. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #13 June 26, 2006 http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/26/iraq.troops/index.html QuoteResponding to reports of possible troop reductions in Iraq, President Bush said Monday that the U.S. presence there will be determined by military commanders, the Iraqi government and "conditions on the ground." no looks like kerry was worng.... ****************************************** Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #14 June 26, 2006 >no looks like kerry was worng.... Last week the democrats (including Kerry) pushed two proposals through Congress to phase out US troops - one over the next year, one simply at some time in the future. They've been pushing for such a withdrawal plan for quite some time. Right wingers said they wanted to "cut and run" and voted down the measure. "Withdrawal is not an option" said Frist in reference to the proposals. Now the general in charge of US forces in Iraq wants to do exactly the same thing. You have a choice to make here. a.) Claim that's what you "wanted all along" and hope no one reads your old posts. b.) Claim that "things are completely different now" and hope no one reads the news. c.) Claim that the US military is a despicable "cut and run" kind of outfit. d.) Admit that we should do what the democrats have been pushing for. (I know, no chance of that.) d.) Change the subject. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #15 June 26, 2006 Quotehttp://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/26/iraq.troops/index.html QuoteResponding to reports of possible troop reductions in Iraq, President Bush said Monday that the U.S. presence there will be determined by military commanders, the Iraqi government and "conditions on the ground." no looks like kerry was worng.... ****************************************** Who was president when we abandoned N. Korea to the commies? Who was president when we abandoned S. Vietnam to the commies? Who was the president that cut back the fight against the Taliban in Afghanistan before finishing the job (and which has now come back to haunt us)? HINT - none were Democrats. ...... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #16 June 26, 2006 QuoteAre you still posting stuff you know to be untrue, just for your amusement? Oh, the irony, once again! From the one who tried to deceive everyone about a significant change in crime rate with a .02% change, from one single murder. And then after being beaten down you finally decided to claim it was "parody". So if you're against things that are posted which are untrue, then I guess you're against yourself. You sound like the fable of "the boy who cried wolf", who told fibs so many times, that no one any longer believed anything he said. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #17 June 26, 2006 >then I guess you're against yourself. Are you still against the "cut and run" losers? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #18 June 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteAre you still posting stuff you know to be untrue, just for your amusement? Oh, the irony, once again! From the one who tried to deceive everyone about a significant change in crime rate with a .02% change, from one single murder. And then after being beaten down you finally decided to claim it was "parody". So if you're against things that are posted which are untrue, then I guess you're against yourself. You sound like the fable of "the boy who cried wolf", who told fibs so many times, that no one any longer believed anything he said. Where did I say it was "significant"? Provide a link to the post in which I made that claim or retract your statement. All I said was that it decreased, and that is true (447 is LESS THAN 448 in most states). I wrote not one qualifier (large, enormous, significant, huge, miniscule...) about the decrease. You need to re-read the thread, carefully this time. I will accept your apology when you discover that you are wrong in accusing me of deception.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #19 June 26, 2006 QuoteWho was president when we abandoned N. Korea to the commies? Who was president when we abandoned S. Vietnam to the commies? Who was the president that cut back the fight against the Taliban in Afghanistan before finishing the job (and which has now come back to haunt us)? HINT - none were Democrats. I wonder who would actually stand up with a weapon in his hands if he needed to.. Kerry or Bush. One has...and has pulled the trigger on another human being. the other has not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #20 June 26, 2006 >One has...and has pulled the trigger on another human being. Silly woman. Democrats who serve their countries are war criminals. Republicans who fly on Navy jets as passengers - now, those are the real deal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #21 June 26, 2006 the only plan from Bush is to stay in Iraq is until the Iraqi's can take over and are welcome. He stated this how many times? As you well know their are plans to invade Canada, Cuba, Mexico. Will we tomorrow, no. You must be smart enough to know that setting a date to pull out is counter productive and would be a loss to the Iraqi's more than anyone. The only ones that does not understand this is the Murtha crowd. _________________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #22 June 26, 2006 QuoteOh, the irony, once again! From the one who tried to deceive everyone about a significant change in crime rate with a .02% change, from one single murder. And then after being beaten down you finally decided to claim it was "parody". So if you're against things that are posted which are untrue, then I guess you're against yourself. You sound like the fable of "the boy who cried wolf", who told fibs so many times, that no one any longer believed anything he said. You got to expect this from the libs, i just ignore it. __________________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #23 June 26, 2006 Quote commies? John i am shocked....... not PC at all _________________________________________________ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #24 June 26, 2006 Who would accept a purple heart for a scratch? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,132 #25 June 26, 2006 >The only ones that does not understand this is the Murtha crowd. And now, apparently, the US military. Spin it all you like; the commander of the US troops in Iraq today proposed a hard date for a pullout to begin, just as the democrats have proposed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites