0
GTAVercetti

Please tell me this is a joke

Recommended Posts

Quote

I was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week.



Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam.

And these are the folks the cut-and-run liberals want to let take over Iraq with an immediate U.S. pull-out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week.



Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam.

And these are the folks the cut-and-run liberals want to let take over Iraq with an immediate U.S. pull-out.

Ain't my country. Fuck em. Let them sort it out themselves:P
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week.



Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam.

And these are the folks the cut-and-run liberals want to let take over Iraq with an immediate U.S. pull-out.



When will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

When will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop.



There you go changing subjects again.

Some people are calling for it, at the same time they are also calling for the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Go figure. Cut-and-run liberals love to pretend to care and want to help, but then they don't want to stay around long enough to complete the job.

The U.N. is handling Darfur. And doing a great job of it, eh? Liberals love the U.N. too.

But hey, go start your own thread if you want to talk about the Muslim-led genocide in the Sudan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

When will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop.



There you go changing subjects again.

Some people are calling for it, at the same time they are also calling for the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Go figure. Cut-and-run liberals love to pretend to care and want to help, but then they don't want to stay around long enough to complete the job.

The U.N. is handling Darfur. And doing a great job of it, eh? Liberals love the U.N. too.

But hey, go start your own thread if you want to talk about the Muslim-led genocide in the Sudan.



Carefully explain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

When will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop.



There you go changing subjects again.

Some people are calling for it, at the same time they are also calling for the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Go figure. Cut-and-run liberals love to pretend to care and want to help, but then they don't want to stay around long enough to complete the job.

The U.N. is handling Darfur. And doing a great job of it, eh? Liberals love the U.N. too.

But hey, go start your own thread if you want to talk about the Muslim-led genocide in the Sudan.



Carefully explain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians.



When I go fishing, I never catch the largest fish in the pond. But that doesn't mean my trip has no validity. It also doesn't mean I won't stop fishing just because I didn't catch the largest fish last time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>When I go fishing, I never catch the largest fish in the pond. But
>that doesn't mean my trip has no validity.

Well, to be fair - if you accidentally killed a bunch of fishermen every time you went fishing, after a while other fishermen might decide that the lakes should be reserved for fishermen who can avoid killing so many people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

explain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians.



So let me see if I have your philosophy straight:
"If we can't help everyone at the same time, then we shouldn't help anyone."
Is that it?

And since there are always multiple peoples that need assistance at any one time, and since America's resources are not unlimited, therefore the U.S. should never bother to help anyone.

Correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>And since there are always multiple peoples that need
>assistance at any one time, and since America's resources are
>not unlimited, therefore the U.S. should never bother to help
> anyone.

So the latest rationale change:

Saddam Hussein has WMD's.
Saddam Hussein presents a threat to the US.
Saddam Hussein helped the 9/11 hijackers.
Saddam Hussein killed thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Saddam Hussein's regime was the most brutal regime around.

Saddam Hussein was just one of the many bad people around. Might as well invade him.

What's next?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

explain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians.



So let me see if I have your philosophy straight:
"If we can't help everyone at the same time, then we shouldn't help anyone."
Is that it?

And since there are always multiple peoples that need assistance at any one time, and since America's resources are not unlimited, therefore the U.S. should never bother to help anyone.

Correct?



I guess you can't answer the question so you change the subject.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam.



You're forgetting the party line. The Iraqi people are much better off with Saddam deposed. That's why we went there, to remove the brutal dictator and stop his totalitarian reign, right? Mission accomplished!

Blues,
Dave
"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!"
(drink Mountain Dew)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam.



You're forgetting the party line. The Iraqi people are much better off with Saddam deposed. That's why we went there, to remove the brutal dictator and stop his totalitarian reign, right? Mission accomplished!

Blues,
Dave



We've had people murdered for wearing the wrong colors on their clothes in the USA.** Good reason for Canada to invade and depose the President.

** From a Sacramento trial: Based on Deputy District Attorney Marlisa Ferreira's comments in court, the motive for the shooting may be little more than retaliation or a fight over gang colors.

Police have said the defendants are Sureños, who prefer blue, and that the victim was affiliated with the Norteños, who prefer red.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


So the latest rationale change:

Saddam Hussein has WMD's.
Saddam Hussein presents a threat to the US.
Saddam Hussein helped the 9/11 hijackers.
Saddam Hussein killed thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Saddam Hussein's regime was the most brutal regime around.

Saddam Hussein was just one of the many bad people around. Might as well invade him.

What's next?



In fairness Bill, I've amended your crossing out of #2 above.

Iraq DID present a threat to the US. He started selling his oil in Euros, remember? Even those satanic incarnates, Chavez and Ahmadinejad have only threatened to do that so far.

In the meantime, we have to wait for the Iraqi situation to stabilise and ensure that the new, independent, democratic Iraq WILL act like a colony, and that the natives won't go doing anything stupid with democracy, like voting for who THEY want to govern them.

In the meantime, "The Big Green Fighting Machine" will continue to protect "The Big Green Printing Machine"!

Mike.

Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable.

Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


So the latest rationale change:

Saddam Hussein has WMD's.
Saddam Hussein presents a threat to the US.
Saddam Hussein helped the 9/11 hijackers.
Saddam Hussein killed thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Saddam Hussein's regime was the most brutal regime around.

Saddam Hussein was just one of the many bad people around. Might as well invade him.

What's next?



In fairness Bill, I've amended your crossing out of #2 above.

Iraq DID present a threat to the US. He started selling his oil in Euros, remember? Even those satanic incarnates, Chavez and Ahmadinejad have only threatened to do that so far.

In the meantime, we have to wait for the Iraqi situation to stabilise and ensure that the new, independent, democratic Iraq WILL act like a colony, and that the natives won't go doing anything stupid with democracy, like voting for who THEY want to govern them.

Mike.



Right, I'm sure they will remember the lessons of Iran (1953) and Chile(1973). Republican presidents in the US only tolerate democracy if the natives elect leaders satisfactory to the Republicans.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0