GTAVercetti 0 #1 June 23, 2006 I was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week. Falafel ban in Iraq Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #2 June 23, 2006 *shakes head* Friggin insane....Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GTAVercetti 0 #3 June 23, 2006 Quote*shakes head* Friggin insane.... I do like the quote in there about the fact that guns didn't really exist when Mohammed was around either. Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #4 June 23, 2006 No it is worse than insanity, why vilify the insane for an organic disorder, when these people do whatever act they like as a religous act. One of the two is a disease, and one is an actual human willing themselves to be this way. Wow Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #5 June 23, 2006 Couldn't agree more (is that a 1st). Regards, (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #6 June 23, 2006 QuoteI was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week. Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam. And these are the folks the cut-and-run liberals want to let take over Iraq with an immediate U.S. pull-out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #7 June 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteI was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week. Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam. And these are the folks the cut-and-run liberals want to let take over Iraq with an immediate U.S. pull-out.Ain't my country. Fuck em. Let them sort it out themselvesI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #8 June 23, 2006 obviously the falafal vendors need to invest in some fire arms. Violent Crimes like these would see immediate drastic reductions Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #9 June 23, 2006 Running water inside of buildings wasn't in their prophet's time, either. The vendors need to buy some guns, and use them.We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #10 June 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteI was looking up information on making falafels and I came across this last week. Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam. And these are the folks the cut-and-run liberals want to let take over Iraq with an immediate U.S. pull-out. When will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #11 June 23, 2006 or even back home... or has all murdering stopped in the US? (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #12 June 23, 2006 Quoteor has all murdering stopped in the US? I hear Chicago was down 1. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #13 June 23, 2006 (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #14 June 23, 2006 QuoteWhen will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop. There you go changing subjects again. Some people are calling for it, at the same time they are also calling for the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Go figure. Cut-and-run liberals love to pretend to care and want to help, but then they don't want to stay around long enough to complete the job. The U.N. is handling Darfur. And doing a great job of it, eh? Liberals love the U.N. too. But hey, go start your own thread if you want to talk about the Muslim-led genocide in the Sudan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #15 June 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteWhen will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop. There you go changing subjects again. Some people are calling for it, at the same time they are also calling for the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Go figure. Cut-and-run liberals love to pretend to care and want to help, but then they don't want to stay around long enough to complete the job. The U.N. is handling Darfur. And doing a great job of it, eh? Liberals love the U.N. too. But hey, go start your own thread if you want to talk about the Muslim-led genocide in the Sudan. Carefully explain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #16 June 24, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteWhen will the US go to police Sudan, then, John? Lots of killing going on there that our boys could stop. There you go changing subjects again. Some people are calling for it, at the same time they are also calling for the U.S. to pull out of Iraq. Go figure. Cut-and-run liberals love to pretend to care and want to help, but then they don't want to stay around long enough to complete the job. The U.N. is handling Darfur. And doing a great job of it, eh? Liberals love the U.N. too. But hey, go start your own thread if you want to talk about the Muslim-led genocide in the Sudan. Carefully explain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians. When I go fishing, I never catch the largest fish in the pond. But that doesn't mean my trip has no validity. It also doesn't mean I won't stop fishing just because I didn't catch the largest fish last time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #17 June 24, 2006 >When I go fishing, I never catch the largest fish in the pond. But >that doesn't mean my trip has no validity. Well, to be fair - if you accidentally killed a bunch of fishermen every time you went fishing, after a while other fishermen might decide that the lakes should be reserved for fishermen who can avoid killing so many people. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #18 June 26, 2006 Quoteexplain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians. So let me see if I have your philosophy straight:"If we can't help everyone at the same time, then we shouldn't help anyone."Is that it? And since there are always multiple peoples that need assistance at any one time, and since America's resources are not unlimited, therefore the U.S. should never bother to help anyone. Correct? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #19 June 26, 2006 >And since there are always multiple peoples that need >assistance at any one time, and since America's resources are >not unlimited, therefore the U.S. should never bother to help > anyone. So the latest rationale change: Saddam Hussein has WMD's. Saddam Hussein presents a threat to the US. Saddam Hussein helped the 9/11 hijackers. Saddam Hussein killed thousands of innocent Iraqis. Saddam Hussein's regime was the most brutal regime around. Saddam Hussein was just one of the many bad people around. Might as well invade him. What's next? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #20 June 26, 2006 QuoteQuoteexplain why our boys have to die, and why we have to pay $(hundreds of billions) to protect Iraqi civilians, but not Sudanese civilians. So let me see if I have your philosophy straight:"If we can't help everyone at the same time, then we shouldn't help anyone."Is that it? And since there are always multiple peoples that need assistance at any one time, and since America's resources are not unlimited, therefore the U.S. should never bother to help anyone. Correct? I guess you can't answer the question so you change the subject.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #21 June 26, 2006 These "people" are nothing but bipedal vermin.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livendive 8 #22 June 26, 2006 Quote Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam. You're forgetting the party line. The Iraqi people are much better off with Saddam deposed. That's why we went there, to remove the brutal dictator and stop his totalitarian reign, right? Mission accomplished! Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #23 June 26, 2006 QuoteQuote Murdering people for selling chickpeas. Wonderful. But it doesn't surprise me. They've also been murdering people for wearing shorts during sports games, and other such capital crimes against Islam. You're forgetting the party line. The Iraqi people are much better off with Saddam deposed. That's why we went there, to remove the brutal dictator and stop his totalitarian reign, right? Mission accomplished! Blues, Dave We've had people murdered for wearing the wrong colors on their clothes in the USA.** Good reason for Canada to invade and depose the President. ** From a Sacramento trial: Based on Deputy District Attorney Marlisa Ferreira's comments in court, the motive for the shooting may be little more than retaliation or a fight over gang colors. Police have said the defendants are Sureños, who prefer blue, and that the victim was affiliated with the Norteños, who prefer red. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miked10270 0 #24 June 27, 2006 Quote So the latest rationale change: Saddam Hussein has WMD's. Saddam Hussein presents a threat to the US. Saddam Hussein helped the 9/11 hijackers. Saddam Hussein killed thousands of innocent Iraqis. Saddam Hussein's regime was the most brutal regime around. Saddam Hussein was just one of the many bad people around. Might as well invade him. What's next? In fairness Bill, I've amended your crossing out of #2 above. Iraq DID present a threat to the US. He started selling his oil in Euros, remember? Even those satanic incarnates, Chavez and Ahmadinejad have only threatened to do that so far. In the meantime, we have to wait for the Iraqi situation to stabilise and ensure that the new, independent, democratic Iraq WILL act like a colony, and that the natives won't go doing anything stupid with democracy, like voting for who THEY want to govern them. In the meantime, "The Big Green Fighting Machine" will continue to protect "The Big Green Printing Machine"! Mike. Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable. Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #25 June 27, 2006 QuoteQuote So the latest rationale change: Saddam Hussein has WMD's. Saddam Hussein presents a threat to the US. Saddam Hussein helped the 9/11 hijackers. Saddam Hussein killed thousands of innocent Iraqis. Saddam Hussein's regime was the most brutal regime around. Saddam Hussein was just one of the many bad people around. Might as well invade him. What's next? In fairness Bill, I've amended your crossing out of #2 above. Iraq DID present a threat to the US. He started selling his oil in Euros, remember? Even those satanic incarnates, Chavez and Ahmadinejad have only threatened to do that so far. In the meantime, we have to wait for the Iraqi situation to stabilise and ensure that the new, independent, democratic Iraq WILL act like a colony, and that the natives won't go doing anything stupid with democracy, like voting for who THEY want to govern them. Mike. Right, I'm sure they will remember the lessons of Iran (1953) and Chile(1973). Republican presidents in the US only tolerate democracy if the natives elect leaders satisfactory to the Republicans.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites