0
warpedskydiver

Angry Neighbors Battle It Out With Signs

Recommended Posts

Angry Neighbors Battle It Out With Signs
By Associated Press
Fri Jun 16, 8:13 PM

COLUMBIA CITY, Ind. - A feud between neighbors that began over roving pets has sparked a biting dialogue using homemade signs along the side of the road. Pam and Ron Castle say their neighbor, Larry Shrock, shot their beagle mix named Jake on June 1 and burned his body in an incinerator.

According to a police report, the Shrocks said they asked the Castles to keep their dogs at home, worried the animals would try to attack rabbit hutches on their property. When the dogs returned, Shrock told police he shot one of the animals. No charges have been filed.

Unsatisfied with the response from police and his neighbors, Ron Castle used red paint to write on 4-foot-by-8-foot plywood board: "My Neighbor, Larry Shrock, House on Left up on Hill (arrow) Shot My Dog, Then Burned It." He added an expletive to the sign he posted alongside the road near his house.

"I didn't know what else to do," he said. "What can I do to this man that has caused me so much grief?"

On June 7, after a second neighbor complained Shrock shot another dog, Castle took out the paint again.

"Mowrey Road Dog Killer Ahead On Left, Two Shot and Killed, One Burned."

The Shrocks fought back with blue paint and a sign of their own.

"Neighbor's Dog Killed My Pet Bunnies, Scared My Granddaughter. I Warned Him Twice."

Castle disagreed, and penned a third sign, which denied the rabbit allegations.

Shrock has since taken down his sign, but Castle's three messages remain visible to eastbound drivers who crest a small hill in the community of about 7,800 residents about 20 miles northwest of Fort Wayne.

"My wife and I fear for our lives," Shrock told The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne.
Quote



They should fear for their lives until their entire family is shot dead and burned in the very same incinerator.

Posting signs is for pussies.

I am sorry if this message has offended any pussies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Roaming dogs? Leash laws.



Not every place has a leash law. I see your point on letting the dogs run around the neighborhood. But why did he shoot them? They were beagles for christ sake. If anything else call the dog catcher. Unless a beagle comes up to me foaming at the mouth about to latch on to my goodies I'm not going to shoot the damn thing.
If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I am sorry if this message has offended any pussies.


So what if it did. There not going to kick your ass or something. There PUSSIES!;)



Hijack: "They're not going to kick your ass or something. They're PUSSIES!"

Guide: They're going to park their cars over there.

Buwhaaaaahaaaa..........write it right!!:S:P;):)
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Hijack: "They're not going to kick your ass or something. They're PUSSIES!"

Guide: They're going to park their cars over there.

Buwhaaaaahaaaa..........write it right!!




How many times must I tell you guy's! I FAILED english in HS. And barely got through collage english so stop making fun of the english impaired. :S
If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If anything else call the dog catcher. Unless a beagle comes up to me foaming at the mouth about to latch on to my goodies I'm going to shoot the damn thing.



So you'll shoot any dog except the rabid one attacking your nutsack? Well it's your decision bro but I think it should be the other way round:P
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They should fear for their lives until their entire family is shot dead...



So you disapprove of someone protecting their bunnies from attack on their own property.

But you think that the entire human family should be murdered because their dad did so.

Wonderful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

They should fear for their lives until their entire family is shot dead...



So you disapprove of someone protecting their bunnies from attack on their own property.

But you think that the entire human family should be murdered because their dad did so.

Wonderful.



I did not say should be shot dead, but I was pointing out that upon seizing the moment to shoot 2 dogs and incinerate one he may have very good reason to fear for his and his families lives.

Weren't the rabbits in cages?, or were they just running loose and he considered them his?

I own a dog and hes a good boy, if someone shot him dead, their family tree is getting pulled out by the roots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If he shot the dogs on his property and espically after prior warnings than I dont see the problem. Its done every year with coyotes and other wild dogs. I probably wouldnt have done it myself just becouse it probably isint worth the extra trouble but if its on your property and you feel it to protect your family or envestments (bunines can be a envestment) then oh well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I own a dog and hes a good boy, if someone shot him dead, their
>family tree is getting pulled out by the roots.

Now that is a sad statement on moral values today.



Here is a morality lesson:

Do not kill or injure something that belongs to another unless you are prepared to face the consequense of your actions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Do not kill or injure something that belongs to another unless you
>are prepared to face the consequense of your actions.

Do you believe the US should face the consequences of their actions in Iraq?



Yes and our Soldiers all know that.

That is why we have a PROFESSIONAL military drawn from volunteers and schooled in the laws of warfare and the geneva conventions.

That is also why our Soldiers do not make policy but rather they implement it to the fullest extent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>Do not kill or injure something that belongs to another unless you
>are prepared to face the consequense of your actions.

Do you believe the US should face the consequences of their actions in Iraq?



Yes and our Soldiers all know that.

That is why we have a PROFESSIONAL military drawn from volunteers and schooled in the laws of warfare and the geneva conventions.

That is also why our Soldiers do not make policy but rather they implement it to the fullest extent.



That is the reason why it is possible to support the troops while not supporting the policy that put them there.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shrock:
Please keep your dogs at home.
(or, if you prefer the aggressive approach - Keep you freakin' dogs off my property or I'll shoot their sorry asses)

Castle:
I'll let my dogs run loose if I want to.

Shrock:
Ok, buddy...BAM!

Catle:
WAAAAAAAWAAAAAAAA

I don't see a problem here....
:|
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I did not say should be shot dead



Yes, you did, in message #1: "They should fear for their lives until their entire family is shot dead and burned in the very same incinerator."

Quote

Weren't the rabbits in cages?



It doesn't matter - they were his rabbits on his property. If your dogs trespass on his property because you aren't controlling them properly, and they threaten his rabbits, then he can justifiably shoot them.

If you don't like that, then you need to make sure you control your dogs and keep them on your own property.

Quote

I own a dog and hes a good boy, if someone shot him dead, their family tree is getting pulled out by the roots.



If your dog runs out into the road in front of an oncoming car, and gets run over and killed, are you going to murder the driver of the car?

Let's say that you have a neighbor with a pet tiger, and that tiger gets loose, roams the neighborhood, strolls into your yard and threatens your dog. You shoot the tiger to protect your dog. Can that tiger-owning neighbor now justifiably murder you and your entire family in revenge for you shooting his pet tiger? According to your logic, that is the outcome of which you would approve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0