rushmc 23 #1 June 16, 2006 Yes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #2 June 16, 2006 Well this can't be true, because the lefties just can't have the truth being told. You are now causing them to seek counseling Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #3 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html QuoteWell this can't be true, because the lefties just can't have the truth being told. You are now causing them to seek counseling Yes, because after all, Fox News is the only network that tells the truth. I believe it's you guys that should seek counseling -- Room 101 has really done a number on y'all. edited to add a t-shirt design for rushmc that I've posted before. You really would wear it quite well. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #4 June 16, 2006 Yes, because after all, Fox News is the only network that tells the truth.Quote Hhmm, where did I say that?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Alias 0 #5 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html Wow! Not thats evidence invading Iraq was justified when grouped with the nationalistic chant of "9/11 - 9/11 - 9/11" I think that was the second of many reasons the Bush Administration gave for the invasion. After the first one. Going on the UN's behalf, even after they said "DON'T"! But before the third one "We are liberators" That report, has finally convinced me That link was solid Carpe Diem Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Channman 2 #6 June 16, 2006 Lets not forget the other documents that show clearly we are winning the war in IRAQ. Dead men tell no tells unless they leave the writtings behind. ZOWCOWWEE, , helped lead us to many other killers that we had the chance to Kill (107) and capture hundreds more. I'm thinking Club Gito for the captured foreign fighters and a trail before the military court and a bullet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Adriandavies 0 #7 June 16, 2006 'It is highly probable...appeared to chronicle ...describes a meeting with an unidentified Iraqi official referred to as “M.O.M.,” who possibly is Tahir Jalil Habbush al Tikriti,...Probably M.O.M.' Oh yes this is absolute proof isn't it! It is full of probable, maybe, and references to unidentified 3 parties. I have a genuine question though and that is surely three years after the overthrow of Saddam, the capture of many of his top officials and pretty much unfeterred access to the Iraqi government archives, wouldn't you think that the US would be able to find something a bit more definitive than this? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites miked10270 0 #8 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html Without wishing to impugn Fox News' editorial policy, I think I'll wait and see it The BBC picks it up. The nice thing about The Beeb is that it's money's guaranteed without control over it's content - they don't have to satisfy anyone to ensure their income. This is perhaps the best guarantee of impartiality we can get. Mike. Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable. Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wmw999 2,558 #9 June 16, 2006 I've found more evidence -- a picture showing both of them together, no less Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterblaster72 0 #10 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html Without wishing to impugn Fox News' editorial policy, I think I'll wait and see it The BBC picks it up. The nice thing about The Beeb is that it's money's guaranteed without control over it's content - they don't have to satisfy anyone to ensure their income. This is perhaps the best guarantee of impartiality we can get. Mike. Well said -- precisely why BBC is my primary news source. It's useless to try communicating what you said to rushmc though -- I've suggested BBC many times to him, but his idea of impartiality is pretty much any swill that caters to his viewpoints. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Zipp0 1 #11 June 16, 2006 I have proof Rumsfeld is a terrorist. He associated with the Taliban supporting, gas-his-own-people scumbag, Saddam Hussein. See attached. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #12 June 16, 2006 >It's useless to try communicating what you said to rushmc though -- I've suggested BBC many times to him, but his idea of impartiality is pretty much any swill that caters to his viewpoints. Indirect attack hmm? I read the BBC so you obviousy don't know me or what you are talking about. I have found the same infomation I posted in a Londan online paper, have you? Keep your indignat swipes to yourself if you don't want people to know the color of your stripes or. Comment back head on if you got the guts"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites miked10270 0 #13 June 16, 2006 QuoteIndirect attack hmm? No. That was in no way indirect! I believe that when you look at ANY information source or news service, you should consider the words of Miles Copeland: "Listen to what they're saying, then consider WHY they're saying it." Mike. Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable. Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #14 June 16, 2006 March 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterblaster72 0 #15 June 16, 2006 QuoteI read the BBC... Could have fooled me. I've yet to see you cite anything from them. Perhaps it's because they do their jobs as journalists and not propagandists? QuoteI have found the same infomation I posted in a Londan online paper, have you? Which London online paper -- could it perhaps be The Sun (also owned by Rupert Murdoch)? They recycle a lot of Fox News' garbage. QuoteIndirect attack hmm? ... Keep your indignat swipes to yourself if you don't want people to know the color of your stripes or. Personally, I have nothing against you and I'm sure you're a nice fellow. I'm not sure why you would take this as an attack; just commenting on the skewed sources you continually cite here. It's like masturbation or a circle-jerk with political ideas -- you're not going to convince anyone else other than those who agree with you when you cite only NewsMax/Fox etc. as your sources. QuoteComment back head on if you got the guts Ok then, I'll modify my quote: It's useless to try communicating what you miked10270 said to rushmc you though -- I've suggested BBC many times to him you, but his your idea of impartiality is pretty much any swill that caters to his your viewpoints. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterblaster72 0 #16 June 16, 2006 QuoteMarch 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm Now we're talking, much better Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #17 June 16, 2006 People go the places they are the most comfortable and I do the same. However, when looking at many sites most of the time (not all) it is a cut and paste duplicate. Fox, despite what those that do not like it. Has more sides of a story with less inserted comentary in thier news than most other outltes. The problem that others have with Fox and other non original outlets is that the "originals" no longer can make a statement and have it go unchallenged. Too bad from them. Their own BS reporting is why they are loosing shares, not because Fox is here... The comments made were uncalled for and incorrect. I hope no one posting back directly to you says it is useless (just because you disagree) let alone to someone else in the thread wondering if you might see it........."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #18 June 16, 2006 here is one where you can pick your own http://news.google.com/news?q=Abu+Musab+al+Zarqawi+US+Iran+war&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&as_qdr=all&sa=X&oi=news&ct=title"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #19 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteMarch 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm Now we're talking, much better Thanks, but that beer thingy made me thristy"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #20 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html I'm a little confused here. Didn't President Bush himself say there was no link between Saddam and 9/11? WHY do you keep harping on this?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterblaster72 0 #21 June 16, 2006 QuoteFox, despite what those that do not like it. Has more sides of a story with less inserted comentary in thier news than most other outltes. You've GOT to be kidding us on this one. Quote The problem that others have with Fox and other non original outlets is that the "originals" no longer can make a statement and have it go unchallenged. Too bad from them. Their own BS reporting is why they are loosing shares, not because Fox is here... Actually, I think Fox's BS reporting is exactly why they're the #1 news outlet -- the sensational and partial commentary and the baiting with loaded questions adds entertainment value that other news outlets have not offered. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #22 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html I'm a little confused here. Didn't President Bush himself say there was no link between Saddam and 9/11? WHY do you keep harping on this? For all the Bush haters Full content of the letter for you http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/06-06/06-16-06/02world-nation.htm"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Zipp0 1 #23 June 16, 2006 QuoteMarch 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm LOL. Only one of these articles that you state is related to the article the thread is about. Two articles are about the al-Zarqawi documents indicating the Al Qaeda plot to start a US/Iran war. One is about the possibility Russia gave Iraq our war plans prior to the invasion. Only the weekly standard piece deals with the article that this thread pertains to. Do you always do such rigorous research? -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterblaster72 0 #24 June 16, 2006 For a second I wondered if that photo was doctored, but the juxtaposed flowers underneath Saddam and bin Laden were enough proof to me that they were in the same place together. hilarious, I laughed out loud at that one Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #25 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteFox, despite what those that do not like it. Has more sides of a story with less inserted comentary in thier news than most other outltes. You've GOT to be kidding us on this one. Quote The problem that others have with Fox and other non original outlets is that the "originals" no longer can make a statement and have it go unchallenged. Too bad from them. Their own BS reporting is why they are loosing shares, not because Fox is here... Actually, I think Fox's BS reporting is exactly why they're the #1 news outlet -- the sensational and partial commentary and the baiting with loaded questions adds entertainment value that other news outlets have not offered. Your kidding right? Even college studies have said ABC, CBS and NBC input direction and opinion in the "news". Simple things like starting a story saying "Right Wing commentator" (you insert the name)... But bring up the likes of Farhcon (sp) and the Reverand Jackson, Dean, Soros, Sheehan for christ sakes, with very little leading comentary. Fox is by far more ballanced but I can not say they do not embelish for sales sake......."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Alias 0 #5 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html Wow! Not thats evidence invading Iraq was justified when grouped with the nationalistic chant of "9/11 - 9/11 - 9/11" I think that was the second of many reasons the Bush Administration gave for the invasion. After the first one. Going on the UN's behalf, even after they said "DON'T"! But before the third one "We are liberators" That report, has finally convinced me That link was solid Carpe Diem Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #6 June 16, 2006 Lets not forget the other documents that show clearly we are winning the war in IRAQ. Dead men tell no tells unless they leave the writtings behind. ZOWCOWWEE, , helped lead us to many other killers that we had the chance to Kill (107) and capture hundreds more. I'm thinking Club Gito for the captured foreign fighters and a trail before the military court and a bullet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adriandavies 0 #7 June 16, 2006 'It is highly probable...appeared to chronicle ...describes a meeting with an unidentified Iraqi official referred to as “M.O.M.,” who possibly is Tahir Jalil Habbush al Tikriti,...Probably M.O.M.' Oh yes this is absolute proof isn't it! It is full of probable, maybe, and references to unidentified 3 parties. I have a genuine question though and that is surely three years after the overthrow of Saddam, the capture of many of his top officials and pretty much unfeterred access to the Iraqi government archives, wouldn't you think that the US would be able to find something a bit more definitive than this? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miked10270 0 #8 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html Without wishing to impugn Fox News' editorial policy, I think I'll wait and see it The BBC picks it up. The nice thing about The Beeb is that it's money's guaranteed without control over it's content - they don't have to satisfy anyone to ensure their income. This is perhaps the best guarantee of impartiality we can get. Mike. Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable. Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,558 #9 June 16, 2006 I've found more evidence -- a picture showing both of them together, no less Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #10 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html Without wishing to impugn Fox News' editorial policy, I think I'll wait and see it The BBC picks it up. The nice thing about The Beeb is that it's money's guaranteed without control over it's content - they don't have to satisfy anyone to ensure their income. This is perhaps the best guarantee of impartiality we can get. Mike. Well said -- precisely why BBC is my primary news source. It's useless to try communicating what you said to rushmc though -- I've suggested BBC many times to him, but his idea of impartiality is pretty much any swill that caters to his viewpoints. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #11 June 16, 2006 I have proof Rumsfeld is a terrorist. He associated with the Taliban supporting, gas-his-own-people scumbag, Saddam Hussein. See attached. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #12 June 16, 2006 >It's useless to try communicating what you said to rushmc though -- I've suggested BBC many times to him, but his idea of impartiality is pretty much any swill that caters to his viewpoints. Indirect attack hmm? I read the BBC so you obviousy don't know me or what you are talking about. I have found the same infomation I posted in a Londan online paper, have you? Keep your indignat swipes to yourself if you don't want people to know the color of your stripes or. Comment back head on if you got the guts"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miked10270 0 #13 June 16, 2006 QuoteIndirect attack hmm? No. That was in no way indirect! I believe that when you look at ANY information source or news service, you should consider the words of Miles Copeland: "Listen to what they're saying, then consider WHY they're saying it." Mike. Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable. Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #14 June 16, 2006 March 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #15 June 16, 2006 QuoteI read the BBC... Could have fooled me. I've yet to see you cite anything from them. Perhaps it's because they do their jobs as journalists and not propagandists? QuoteI have found the same infomation I posted in a Londan online paper, have you? Which London online paper -- could it perhaps be The Sun (also owned by Rupert Murdoch)? They recycle a lot of Fox News' garbage. QuoteIndirect attack hmm? ... Keep your indignat swipes to yourself if you don't want people to know the color of your stripes or. Personally, I have nothing against you and I'm sure you're a nice fellow. I'm not sure why you would take this as an attack; just commenting on the skewed sources you continually cite here. It's like masturbation or a circle-jerk with political ideas -- you're not going to convince anyone else other than those who agree with you when you cite only NewsMax/Fox etc. as your sources. QuoteComment back head on if you got the guts Ok then, I'll modify my quote: It's useless to try communicating what you miked10270 said to rushmc you though -- I've suggested BBC many times to him you, but his your idea of impartiality is pretty much any swill that caters to his your viewpoints. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #16 June 16, 2006 QuoteMarch 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm Now we're talking, much better Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #17 June 16, 2006 People go the places they are the most comfortable and I do the same. However, when looking at many sites most of the time (not all) it is a cut and paste duplicate. Fox, despite what those that do not like it. Has more sides of a story with less inserted comentary in thier news than most other outltes. The problem that others have with Fox and other non original outlets is that the "originals" no longer can make a statement and have it go unchallenged. Too bad from them. Their own BS reporting is why they are loosing shares, not because Fox is here... The comments made were uncalled for and incorrect. I hope no one posting back directly to you says it is useless (just because you disagree) let alone to someone else in the thread wondering if you might see it........."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #18 June 16, 2006 here is one where you can pick your own http://news.google.com/news?q=Abu+Musab+al+Zarqawi+US+Iran+war&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&as_qdr=all&sa=X&oi=news&ct=title"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #19 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteMarch 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm Now we're talking, much better Thanks, but that beer thingy made me thristy"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #20 June 16, 2006 QuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html I'm a little confused here. Didn't President Bush himself say there was no link between Saddam and 9/11? WHY do you keep harping on this?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #21 June 16, 2006 QuoteFox, despite what those that do not like it. Has more sides of a story with less inserted comentary in thier news than most other outltes. You've GOT to be kidding us on this one. Quote The problem that others have with Fox and other non original outlets is that the "originals" no longer can make a statement and have it go unchallenged. Too bad from them. Their own BS reporting is why they are loosing shares, not because Fox is here... Actually, I think Fox's BS reporting is exactly why they're the #1 news outlet -- the sensational and partial commentary and the baiting with loaded questions adds entertainment value that other news outlets have not offered. Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #22 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteYes from Fox because it doen't fit the other networks agenda me thinks http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199757,00.html I'm a little confused here. Didn't President Bush himself say there was no link between Saddam and 9/11? WHY do you keep harping on this? For all the Bush haters Full content of the letter for you http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/06-06/06-16-06/02world-nation.htm"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #23 June 16, 2006 QuoteMarch 06 ABC http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1 Weekly Standard the 7th of this month http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4152&R=ECBB75F8 Not too hard hum? How about another one http://www.almanar.com.lb/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=651276 China Daily Anyone? http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/15/content_618195.htm LOL. Only one of these articles that you state is related to the article the thread is about. Two articles are about the al-Zarqawi documents indicating the Al Qaeda plot to start a US/Iran war. One is about the possibility Russia gave Iraq our war plans prior to the invasion. Only the weekly standard piece deals with the article that this thread pertains to. Do you always do such rigorous research? -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #24 June 16, 2006 For a second I wondered if that photo was doctored, but the juxtaposed flowers underneath Saddam and bin Laden were enough proof to me that they were in the same place together. hilarious, I laughed out loud at that one Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #25 June 16, 2006 QuoteQuoteFox, despite what those that do not like it. Has more sides of a story with less inserted comentary in thier news than most other outltes. You've GOT to be kidding us on this one. Quote The problem that others have with Fox and other non original outlets is that the "originals" no longer can make a statement and have it go unchallenged. Too bad from them. Their own BS reporting is why they are loosing shares, not because Fox is here... Actually, I think Fox's BS reporting is exactly why they're the #1 news outlet -- the sensational and partial commentary and the baiting with loaded questions adds entertainment value that other news outlets have not offered. Your kidding right? Even college studies have said ABC, CBS and NBC input direction and opinion in the "news". Simple things like starting a story saying "Right Wing commentator" (you insert the name)... But bring up the likes of Farhcon (sp) and the Reverand Jackson, Dean, Soros, Sheehan for christ sakes, with very little leading comentary. Fox is by far more ballanced but I can not say they do not embelish for sales sake......."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
