Flying-Wench 0 #51 June 7, 2006 QuoteI think it's a valid issue that needs a constitutional amendment. One that says "Legal marriage shall not be denied to any person on the basis of their gender or sexual orientation." hear hear! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelel01 1 #52 June 7, 2006 All I can say is "YEA!". The amendment got shot down in the Senate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites goofyjumper 0 #53 June 8, 2006 Ya, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me.----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites unformed 0 #54 June 8, 2006 QuoteYa, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me. See, it's comments like this that make me wonder what going on in your skulls. What do women and their voting rights have to do with terrorism? The sanctity of marriage is already being destroyed by people that don't take it seriously and allowing gay people to marry just promotes it even more. Directly related. When women as a whole start voting for terrorists and fascism your argument will make . Until then, it doesn't make any sense. Geez. This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #55 June 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteYa, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me. See, it's comments like this that make me wonder what going on in your skulls. What do women and their voting rights have to do with terrorism? The sanctity of marriage is already being destroyed by people that don't take it seriously and allowing gay people to marry just promotes it even more. Directly related. When women as a whole start voting for terrorists and fascism your argument will make . Until then, it doesn't make any sense. Geez. ______________________________________ How many mad women have you seen? That's terror in it's purist form! I think, this whole Constitutional Ammendment thing is a 'snow job' on the part of the politicians to keep them from working on the 'real' issues. With hopes of not screwing-up their chances for re-election. Gimme a break! I think, we need to vote every one of those clowns out of office and start all over. There are 'real' issues out there and the politicians are more concerned with whether or not gays and lesbians can 'legally' get married. If, the politicians are so afraid of tackling the real issues... they don't need to be in office. They all told us when they were running for office, all the 'big' things they would do if elected. All any of them do is skirt and side-step. Just keep those big lobbyist pay-offs coming in! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites goofyjumper 0 #56 June 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteYa, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me. See, it's comments like this that make me wonder what going on in your skulls. What do women and their voting rights have to do with terrorism? The sanctity of marriage is already being destroyed by people that don't take it seriously and allowing gay people to marry just promotes it even more. Directly related. When women as a whole start voting for terrorists and fascism your argument will make . Until then, it doesn't make any sense. Geez. Ok, you obvioulsy did not get the point I was making. I was just saying that we are going backwards in time since this whole whole gay marrige thing started. Next point is; you talk about the sanctity of marriage has been destroyed by gays. It has long been destroyed. Your saying this in a country were we have TV shows called "Who wants to mary a multi-millionare?" Gays getting married are not destroying anything! If we have a 50% divorse rate, there is a much underlying problem and I don't think that gays are doing anything to make it worse. I want you to give me one reason why gays getting married will hurt your personal life. (and no religion, because it is too diverse to make a strong arguement) And no, I am not gay!----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites missg8tordivr 0 #57 June 8, 2006 This is a clear cut case of DISCRIMINATION and an attack on Civil Liberties! Wasn't the main pupose of the constitution to ensure liberty, equality, create a free environment?? "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Last time I looked, LIBERTY ment- The condition of being free from restriction or control. When this was written they were trying to limit the amount of control the government had over the people...I mean isn't that why we came to the US in the first place to escape tyranny?!*** F LORIDA! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #58 June 8, 2006 An amendment is a stupid idea. I think congress could do better things as well. Maybe doing something to fight crime, or increase the school system. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KidWicked 0 #59 June 8, 2006 QuoteI do not want my children to grow up in a world where people can just go around biting the heads off chickens. This is not a joke. This is a tremendous joke - bravo!Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites goofyjumper 0 #60 June 9, 2006 QuoteThis is a clear cut case of DISCRIMINATION and an attack on Civil Liberties! Wasn't the main pupose of the constitution to ensure liberty, equality, create a free environment?? "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Last time I looked, LIBERTY ment- The condition of being free from restriction or control. When this was written they were trying to limit the amount of control the government had over the people...I mean isn't that why we came to the US in the first place to escape tyranny?! hear hear!----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 3 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
goofyjumper 0 #53 June 8, 2006 Ya, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me.----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unformed 0 #54 June 8, 2006 QuoteYa, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me. See, it's comments like this that make me wonder what going on in your skulls. What do women and their voting rights have to do with terrorism? The sanctity of marriage is already being destroyed by people that don't take it seriously and allowing gay people to marry just promotes it even more. Directly related. When women as a whole start voting for terrorists and fascism your argument will make . Until then, it doesn't make any sense. Geez. This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #55 June 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteYa, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me. See, it's comments like this that make me wonder what going on in your skulls. What do women and their voting rights have to do with terrorism? The sanctity of marriage is already being destroyed by people that don't take it seriously and allowing gay people to marry just promotes it even more. Directly related. When women as a whole start voting for terrorists and fascism your argument will make . Until then, it doesn't make any sense. Geez. ______________________________________ How many mad women have you seen? That's terror in it's purist form! I think, this whole Constitutional Ammendment thing is a 'snow job' on the part of the politicians to keep them from working on the 'real' issues. With hopes of not screwing-up their chances for re-election. Gimme a break! I think, we need to vote every one of those clowns out of office and start all over. There are 'real' issues out there and the politicians are more concerned with whether or not gays and lesbians can 'legally' get married. If, the politicians are so afraid of tackling the real issues... they don't need to be in office. They all told us when they were running for office, all the 'big' things they would do if elected. All any of them do is skirt and side-step. Just keep those big lobbyist pay-offs coming in! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goofyjumper 0 #56 June 8, 2006 QuoteQuoteYa, I agree You freakin religeous freaks are trying to go back in time. Next thing you know Bush will come on air and say that women should not vote because of terrorism. I know that seems way far, but it really wouldn't surprise me. See, it's comments like this that make me wonder what going on in your skulls. What do women and their voting rights have to do with terrorism? The sanctity of marriage is already being destroyed by people that don't take it seriously and allowing gay people to marry just promotes it even more. Directly related. When women as a whole start voting for terrorists and fascism your argument will make . Until then, it doesn't make any sense. Geez. Ok, you obvioulsy did not get the point I was making. I was just saying that we are going backwards in time since this whole whole gay marrige thing started. Next point is; you talk about the sanctity of marriage has been destroyed by gays. It has long been destroyed. Your saying this in a country were we have TV shows called "Who wants to mary a multi-millionare?" Gays getting married are not destroying anything! If we have a 50% divorse rate, there is a much underlying problem and I don't think that gays are doing anything to make it worse. I want you to give me one reason why gays getting married will hurt your personal life. (and no religion, because it is too diverse to make a strong arguement) And no, I am not gay!----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missg8tordivr 0 #57 June 8, 2006 This is a clear cut case of DISCRIMINATION and an attack on Civil Liberties! Wasn't the main pupose of the constitution to ensure liberty, equality, create a free environment?? "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Last time I looked, LIBERTY ment- The condition of being free from restriction or control. When this was written they were trying to limit the amount of control the government had over the people...I mean isn't that why we came to the US in the first place to escape tyranny?!*** F LORIDA! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #58 June 8, 2006 An amendment is a stupid idea. I think congress could do better things as well. Maybe doing something to fight crime, or increase the school system. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KidWicked 0 #59 June 8, 2006 QuoteI do not want my children to grow up in a world where people can just go around biting the heads off chickens. This is not a joke. This is a tremendous joke - bravo!Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goofyjumper 0 #60 June 9, 2006 QuoteThis is a clear cut case of DISCRIMINATION and an attack on Civil Liberties! Wasn't the main pupose of the constitution to ensure liberty, equality, create a free environment?? "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Last time I looked, LIBERTY ment- The condition of being free from restriction or control. When this was written they were trying to limit the amount of control the government had over the people...I mean isn't that why we came to the US in the first place to escape tyranny?! hear hear!----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
