Gravitymaster 0 #1 May 17, 2006 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House, in an abrupt reversal, has agreed to let the full Senate and House of Representatives intelligence committees review President George W. Bush's domestic spying program, lawmakers said on Tuesday. The Republican chairmen of the Senate and House panels disclosed the shift two days before a Senate confirmation hearing for Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden as the new CIA director, which is expected to be dominated by concern over the program. The chairmen said separately that Bush had agreed to full committee oversight of his Terrorist Surveillance Program rather than the more limited briefings allowed up to now. The White House, under political pressure, did agree to conduct a set of briefings for the two full committees earlier this year, but those sessions did not disclose operational details about the eavesdropping. Initiated after the September 11 attacks, the program lets the National Security Agency eavesdrop without a court warrant on international phone calls and e-mails made by U.S. citizens if one party is suspected to have links with terrorism. It has stirred an outcry among rights groups and lawmakers who believe Bush overstepped his constitutional authority. The White House has sought to avoid full committee oversight by limiting briefings to subcommittees from each panel. Initially, the administration shared program details only with the chairmen and vice chairmen of the committees and party leaders in the House and Senate. "It became apparent that in order to have a fully informed confirmation hearing, all members of my committee needed to know the full width and breadth of the president's program," Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, who heads the 15-member Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement. Democrats, who have long pushed for full hearings, said the change would bring the White House into compliance with the National Security Act of 1947, which requires the executive branch to keep Congress informed on intelligence matters. "The White House, for the first time, is showing signs that they are serious about oversight," said Democrat Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia, the Senate panel's vice chairman. A full Senate committee briefing was scheduled for Wednesday afternoon. Full oversight was expected to replace subcommittee reviews that have been in place since earlier this year, said committee staff members from both chambers. CONFIRMATION HEARING Hayden, who was the program's architect as NSA director from 1999 to 2005, was expected to face a blizzard of questions on NSA spying at a Thursday confirmation hearing before Roberts' committee. Republicans and Democrats have said Hayden's confirmation would depend on his answers would be. A congressional aide who deals with intelligence matters said the change in policy on NSA oversight would allow Hayden to speak about the program during the classified segment of his confirmation hearing. The aide predicted that broader oversight could also pave the way for bringing the program under federal law. Hayden has signaled possible support for this during meetings with members of Congress. Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said full oversight would eliminate what he called politically driven rumors. Bush has defended the program by saying the intelligence activities he authored are lawful and necessary to protect Americans from further harm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Good move. Hopefully those entrusted with information will not leak it to the press, but I doubt it. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #2 May 17, 2006 The folks on these committees shouldn't be leaking anything to the press, as a clearance is a prerequisite to membership. Not a lot of hotheads on these committees because they need to be non-partisan as possible. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #3 May 17, 2006 There. Was that so hard? I am glad to see that this is happening. Thanks for posting. Zipp0 -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #4 May 17, 2006 QuoteThere. Was that so hard? I am glad to see that this is happening. The reason it quit happening in the first place is that one or more of those people entrusted with the oversight were leaking secret information to the press. Those people should be hunted down and tried for treason. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #5 May 17, 2006 >The reason it quit happening in the first place is that one or more of > those people entrusted with the oversight were leaking secret > information to the press. Those people should be hunted down and > tried for treason. Exactly! We should create a White House Special Investigations Unit to hunt down and plug leaks*. We could call it "the Plumbers Unit" or something like that. I'm sure that would work out great. (* = unless the leaks are used to get back at administration critics, of course.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #6 May 17, 2006 QuoteWASHINGTON (Reuters) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Good move. Hopefully those entrusted with information will not leak it to the press, but I doubt it. - Thread stealer Ok, agreed good move. But the fact remains that he's apparently broken the law. Just because he's decided that he's going to abide by it now doesn't change that fact. As for press leaks, what if the committee members are briefed and they find out that the NSA has a huge database of all of our calls and they've been tracking war protesters and moveon.org members? To leak or not to leak? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites