rushmc 23 #51 May 9, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteKind of like the american that was be-headed on the internet. Oh, I forgot, he was a US citizen so he deserved it Those who invade other people's countries cannot expect it to be all flowers and kisses. I wondered who would be first with this stupid answer.... How to win friends in Iraq Ah, I forgot that is what the US is all about. You are now two for two"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brian3576 0 #52 May 9, 2006 throw him a change up........ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,119 #53 May 9, 2006 >FAR more positives things than negative things !!!! Tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis dead, 2500 US soldiers dead . . . those are pretty negative things. You'd have to get a REALLY REALLY good thing out of it to make up for that. A puppet government that will collapse as soon as we withdraw isn't that really positive thing. Nor is staying there forever and losing 100 troops a year propping up said government. I hope that somehow the new Iraqi government sorts out all its problems, gets its internal affairs in order, gets the Sunnis and the Shi'a to stop fighting, and gets the insurgents to stop fighting us - but every year that goes by, the odds of that happening gets lower and lower. BTW these are NOT positive things: -Really cool pictures of bombs going off (Hollywood does it better anyway) -Places for men ardent for desperate glory to go (there are better ways) -Pissing off the entire world (we will need their support when China tries to get us to disarm the pacific) -Killing tens of thousands of Iraqis (even if they throw rocks at us) -"Defending the US" (Iraq didn't attack us, which more and more people forget every day) -"Taking the fight to them" (Fiji would be a better place to go, and if we kill enough of them, we could create terrorists there too) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #54 May 9, 2006 Quote>FAR more positives things than negative things !!!! Tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis dead, 2500 US soldiers dead . . . those are pretty negative things. You'd have to get a REALLY REALLY good thing out of it to make up for that. A puppet government that will collapse as soon as we withdraw isn't that really positive thing. Nor is staying there forever and losing 100 troops a year propping up said government. I hope that somehow the new Iraqi government sorts out all its problems, gets its internal affairs in order, gets the Sunnis and the Shi'a to stop fighting, and gets the insurgents to stop fighting us - but every year that goes by, the odds of that happening gets lower and lower. BTW these are NOT positive things: -Really cool pictures of bombs going off (Hollywood does it better anyway) -Places for men ardent for desperate glory to go (there are better ways) -Pissing off the entire world (we will need their support when China tries to get us to disarm the pacific) -Killing tens of thousands of Iraqis (even if they throw rocks at us) -"Defending the US" (Iraq didn't attack us, which more and more people forget every day) -"Taking the fight to them" (Fiji would be a better place to go, and if we kill enough of them, we could create terrorists there too) Make up your mind, Bill...it's either a puppet government or it's not...which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #55 May 9, 2006 You are an enigma...."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #56 May 10, 2006 Quotei'd prefer to call it liberation would you rather the invasion hadn't happened? would you rather have had Saddam Hussain still in power? Very droll. So we liberated some 20,000+ Iraqis from life itself. I don't recall any invitation being extended from Iraq for us to liberate them. It seems you are so taken in by our own propaganda that you've forgotten the ACTUAL reasons we invaded in 2003. Reasons laid out in great detail by Colin Powell at the UN and by Bush in the State of the Union address. Reasons that turned out to be false false false.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #57 May 10, 2006 IMO You are the one that mirors the propaganda..... You need to get off your self appointed high horse....... Your left wing demogoging, moveon.org, youngdemocrates.com Bush hating spew is getting old and most of it is a lie, which you seem to be taking to heart... Sorry for my rant, but it is getting very tiring...."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
misaltas 0 #58 May 10, 2006 QuoteI don't recall any invitation being extended from Iraq for us to liberate them. a. Iraqi National Congress (I know, I know, don't hindsight-is-20/20 me.) b. The Shiite majority who we let down by not supporting them overthrow the Sunni majority after Gulf I. c. The Kurds who welcomed the SF and the 173d Abn Bde fighting in the north. Isn't like they were Saddam fans after he used WMD on them. No wait, Saddam didn't ever have WMD. "It seems you are so taken in by our own propaganda that you've forgotten the ACTUAL reasons we invaded in 2003." Actual reasons? Evidence at the time which pointed to Saddam continuing his WMD programs was secondary to the primary reason for the invasion, which was that Saddam did everything to avoid proving he destroyed the WMD he had. Look, everyone knows the post-war was unplanned and poorly executed and is costing us tragically. But the alternative of leaving Saddam in, and years later paying the price, would cause the second guessing to begin why Bush didn't do anything when he had the chance. Sorry if that doesn't fit into anyone's easy "Bush lied" sound bite.Ohne Liebe sind wir nichts Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faber 0 #59 May 10, 2006 funny thing is that if this were posted 2 years ago this tread wouldnt have been as it is now... US and ALLIED we steped up to make a difference in Iraqe,ANY who´s leaving before the mission has finnished aint to be trusted in the furture.. I for one didnt agree in the war against Iraqe to start whith,BUT as a part of a democrasy i stand up and help were i can,meaning we said yes to this job,and were not going to quit it now "just" becourse our kids are getting killed,injuryed and disabeled down there.We knew the consequences of war,thouse who dont fool them self. WE said yes to this war,theres no way that the soildeirs who has lost their lives,lost body parts or has been ruined mentaly should have sacrificed this just for nothing... I like the pics shown in this tread i dont see it as propeganda but its showing the human race trying to survive in the middel of a war.. as other said similar shots should have been taken by the Iraqies... Stay safe Stefan Faber Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faber 0 #60 May 10, 2006 Quote... And I want to know why the Feck they're still there!? we werent as good as we thourght we were.. QuoteI supported the war! I still do! now thats a good thing,our kids need the support they can down there QuoteI quite frankly didn't give a Flying-Feck about the WMDs or lack thereof. This was (at first) a matter of liberating the Iraqi people and giving them the opportunity to make choices about their future. thats why many said that the war were started at a wrong issue,i do agree whith you,but it wasnt the right reasson we went to war.. QuoteWell... Job done. Hussein & the Ba'Athists are toppled. Towns & cities are under control of an elected council. National elections have been held. The core of a new Iraqi police & military have been trained in neighbouring countries.... is that why our troops still are killed down there? as i see it theres no control,and no matter how much a president somewere declaired the war as over i will call that a war zone down there right now.. Stay safe Stefan Faber Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faber 0 #61 May 10, 2006 QuoteLook, everyone knows the post-war was unplanned and poorly executed and is costing us tragically. But the alternative of leaving Saddam in, and years later paying the price, would cause the second guessing to begin why Bush didn't do anything when he had the chance. Sorry if that doesn't fit into anyone's easy "Bush lied" sound bite. Im glad Americans start to realice this... That said i still think its a good thing to relif the Iraqies from Sadam,should have done so at the first gulfwar.. Stay safe Stefan Faber Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #62 May 10, 2006 Quote Okay, Bill would you please confirm the torture and killing of an Iraqi by AMERICANS. I mean a creditable case. Not degrading pictures "tortured to death". One that we captured and then "tortured to death" They're not necessarily military. Some are civilian contractors. And don't forget, CIA is civilian...at least for a little while longer. http://www.cid.army.mil/Documents/OIF-OEF%20Homicides.pdf http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4093997.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4741608.stm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #63 May 10, 2006 Quote Fred Phelps has a Baptist church in Kansas. He and His show up at soldiers funerals and "protest". They hold up signs that say "thank God for 9/11". "God hates fags". (he thinks we are at war cause God is mad at us because homosexuals live in the US. He is a troop hater. Look further down in this forum for the thread about thank god for 9/11. There is a video of one of his freaky followers (also his daughter, I believe). Sounds like Pat Robertson on acid. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #64 May 10, 2006 Quote a. Iraqi National Congress (I know, I know, don't hindsight-is-20/20 me.) b. The Shiite majority who we let down by not supporting them overthrow the Sunni majority after Gulf I. c. The Kurds who welcomed the SF and the 173d Abn Bde fighting in the north. Isn't like they were Saddam fans after he used WMD on them. No wait, Saddam didn't ever have WMD. "It seems you are so taken in by our own propaganda that you've forgotten the ACTUAL reasons we invaded in 2003." Actual reasons? Evidence at the time which pointed to Saddam continuing his WMD programs was secondary to the primary reason for the invasion, which was that Saddam did everything to avoid proving he destroyed the WMD he had. Look, everyone knows the post-war was unplanned and poorly executed and is costing us tragically. But the alternative of leaving Saddam in, and years later paying the price, would cause the second guessing to begin why Bush didn't do anything when he had the chance. Sorry if that doesn't fit into anyone's easy "Bush lied" sound bite. 1) Actually the US created and funded the Iraqi National Congress shortly after the first Gulf war. 2) No one in the region, even the Shiites that we left hanging out to dry wanted us to invade Iraq. 3) Sure, the Kurds didn't want Saddam around but they were essentially running their own region of the country anyway, Saddam didn't have control of the north. 4) You're right, Saddam DID have WMD's and he DID use them on the Kurds....but he was our ally at the time and we did nothing about it, aside from continuing to do business with him until he invaded Kuwait a couple of years later. 5) Powell stated early on in this administration that the sanctions had crippled Saddam's programs. Then 9/11 came and the story changed. 6) You're right, Saddam did continue to posture like he was still a dangerous man, BUT the UN inspectors were in the country with unprecedented access to any and all sites. Bush said we couldn't wait for the inspectors. 7) I thought Saddam was a bad man, no doubt. But he wasn't a threat to us. What this administration did was to abandon the war on terrorism which was next door in Afghanistan by taking all but about 15,000 troops from the bin Laden hunt and invading Iraq, something that had been the goal of of administration officials for about a decade. And today, those terrorists that we're looking for are where? They're right where we left them, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #65 May 10, 2006 QuoteI for 1 and glad they are fighting in IRAQ and not the US ALL GAVE SOME SOME GAVE ALL HOOAH and thanks .. Of course the best case scenario would be not having the fight at all. Our dependency on oil and the desire for Bush and Co. to line their pockets kind of rules out that option. So yeah, I'll agree, better their dead children than ours." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #66 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteJust I find propoganda a bit tiresome So who, then, thinks the pics are staged? If only some, which ones? None of it is staged...the pictures are handpicked. I doubt they are staged, but don't know, and it's irrelevant. A soldier petting a kitty has no bearing on why we are there, what we are doing, what we'll accomplish, or how it will end. A picture like that is window dressing - art at best, propoganda at worst. I oppose our actions, but wish no harm to our troops. To me, the best way to insure them no harm would be to bring them home." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #67 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuote1) Actually the US created and funded the Iraqi National Congress shortly after the first Gulf war. 2) No one in the region, even the Shiites that we left hanging out to dry wanted us to invade Iraq. 3) Sure, the Kurds didn't want Saddam around but they were essentially running their own region of the country anyway, Saddam didn't have control of the north. 4) You're right, Saddam DID have WMD's and he DID use them on the Kurds....but he was our ally at the time and we did nothing about it, aside from continuing to do business with him until he invaded Kuwait a couple of years later. 5) Powell stated early on in this administration that the sanctions had crippled Saddam's programs. Then 9/11 came and the story changed. 6) You're right, Saddam did continue to posture like he was still a dangerous man, BUT the UN inspectors were in the country with unprecedented access to any and all sites. Bush said we couldn't wait for the inspectors. 7) I thought Saddam was a bad man, no doubt. But he wasn't a threat to us. What this administration did was to abandon the war on terrorism which was next door in Afghanistan by taking all but about 15,000 troops from the bin Laden hunt and invading Iraq, something that had been the goal of of administration officials for about a decade. And today, those terrorists that we're looking for are where? They're right where we left them, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That's a pretty good set of bullets. Sums it up well. Most people are not aware that Sadam was one of our buddies right up until he invaded Kuwait. Not only did our government not give a crap how many people he screwed over, they actually supplied him and the Turks with weapons and money to slaughter Kurdish civilians. But invading Kuwait and threatening to destabilize the Middle East in general, and oil supplies specifically, that was crossing the line. People that think we went there to free the Iraqi people from a tyrant or eliminate WMD are incredibly naive. Our government has ignored, and still does ignore, tyrants much worse than Sadam. Our presence in that region since WWII has been about 1 thing - OIL. Nothing else. I doubt we would have even gave a crap about Israel if it weren't for the fact that they represent our best foothold in the region. IMO, they wouldn't even exist if it weren't for oil in the Middle East." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pirana 0 #68 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuoteI for 1 and glad they are fighting in IRAQ and not the US.. ... And I want to know why the Feck they're still there!? I supported the war! I still do! I honestly believe that Iraq HAD to be liberated from the Ba'Athists & Saddam Hussein! I quite frankly didn't give a Flying-Feck about the WMDs or lack thereof. This was (at first) a matter of liberating the Iraqi people and giving them the opportunity to make choices about their future. Well... Job done. Hussein & the Ba'Athists are toppled. Towns & cities are under control of an elected council. National elections have been held. The core of a new Iraqi police & military have been trained in neighbouring countries.... Time to come home and leave the Iraqi's to the self-determination which we are so fond of preaching. Unless, of course, our troops are still there to follow some half-arsed hidden agenda to match the half-arsed plan!? Mike. Exactly my point. If the goal was to bring down Sadam and rid the country of WMD, then we are done. Should go home, right? Can't leave yet though. We need to leave behind a relatively stable government that is under our control, and preferrably very deeply in debt to the USA. It's how we got the House of Saud under our thumb." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pirana 0 #69 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuote Are you serious?!?! Even the most hard core democrats agree that a sudden withdrawl would throw the country into chaos and civil war. Sorry, this one isn't even worth debating.... Jeff They are headed towards civil war whether we withdraw suddenly or slowly, today or 20 years from now. The kind of hate they have transcends generations. We will have to, for all practical purposes, commit to very, very long-term occupation (way beyond our lifetimes) in order to stave off a civil war in Iraq. But long-term occupations are not the modern tools of control, puppet governments and economic slavery are, and cost less. We will leave when someone else is in place to do our work for us." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites penniless 0 #70 May 10, 2006 QuoteIMO You are the one that mirors the propaganda..... You need to get off your self appointed high horse....... Your left wing demogoging, moveon.org, youngdemocrates.com Bush hating spew is getting old and most of it is a lie, which you seem to be taking to heart... Sorry for my rant, but it is getting very tiring.... Facts remain facts even if you are tired of hearing them. The stated reason for the Iraq invasion turned out to be false. We invaded a sovereign nation under false pretenses. Colin Powell's speech to the UN turned out to be an embarrassment of falsehoods. "Mission Accomplished" was nothing of the sort. Thousands of American boys dead and maimed, and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians too. Costs spiraling out of control. All on account of US hubris. Those are the facts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #71 May 10, 2006 >The stated reason for the Iraq invasion turned out to be false. We invaded a sovereign nation under false pretenses.< These statements are false! Enough said........."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #72 May 10, 2006 QuoteThese statements are false! Enough said......... Exactly, questioning anything the WHite House does is decidedly un-patriotic. As a matter of fact, those voicing their concerns with the current administration should be segregated from society and kept in camps. I mean, really, nobody knows what those unpatriotic "almost terrorists" are capable of doing if not kept in check.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,119 #73 May 10, 2006 >Make up your mind, Bill...it's either a puppet government or >it's not...which is it? Right now it's a barely functioning fledgeling government that's trying to get its act together. If we have to prop it up permanently to allow it to survive (as we are doing now) it will be a puppet government. If it asks us to leave (and we do) and it survives, then it will not be. I hope the latter happens, but so far we have had to do the former. They've had three years; will it take another three years? Ten? Thirty? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #74 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuoteThese statements are false! Enough said......... Exactly, questioning anything the WHite House does is decidedly un-patriotic. As a matter of fact, those voicing their concerns with the current administration should be segregated from society and kept in camps. I mean, really, nobody knows what those unpatriotic "almost terrorists" are capable of doing if not kept in check.... Hm, I am looking to see where I posted any of what you have here and I can not find it. Nice try twist, spin and move. Twist, spin and move......."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #75 May 10, 2006 Quote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Reply To -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These statements are false! Enough said......... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exactly, questioning anything the WHite House does is decidedly un-patriotic. As a matter of fact, those voicing their concerns with the current administration should be segregated from society and kept in camps. I mean, really, nobody knows what those unpatriotic "almost terrorists" are capable of doing if not kept in check.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hm, I am looking to see where I posted any of what you have here and I can not find it. Nice try twist, spin and move. Twist, spin and move....... Hmm, I am looking to see where I wrote: rushmc said... and I cannot find it. Nice try Twist, spin and move. Twist, spin and move. I have been dying to ask though.....how often do you enjoy yourself? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 3 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
pirana 0 #68 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuoteI for 1 and glad they are fighting in IRAQ and not the US.. ... And I want to know why the Feck they're still there!? I supported the war! I still do! I honestly believe that Iraq HAD to be liberated from the Ba'Athists & Saddam Hussein! I quite frankly didn't give a Flying-Feck about the WMDs or lack thereof. This was (at first) a matter of liberating the Iraqi people and giving them the opportunity to make choices about their future. Well... Job done. Hussein & the Ba'Athists are toppled. Towns & cities are under control of an elected council. National elections have been held. The core of a new Iraqi police & military have been trained in neighbouring countries.... Time to come home and leave the Iraqi's to the self-determination which we are so fond of preaching. Unless, of course, our troops are still there to follow some half-arsed hidden agenda to match the half-arsed plan!? Mike. Exactly my point. If the goal was to bring down Sadam and rid the country of WMD, then we are done. Should go home, right? Can't leave yet though. We need to leave behind a relatively stable government that is under our control, and preferrably very deeply in debt to the USA. It's how we got the House of Saud under our thumb." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #69 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuote Are you serious?!?! Even the most hard core democrats agree that a sudden withdrawl would throw the country into chaos and civil war. Sorry, this one isn't even worth debating.... Jeff They are headed towards civil war whether we withdraw suddenly or slowly, today or 20 years from now. The kind of hate they have transcends generations. We will have to, for all practical purposes, commit to very, very long-term occupation (way beyond our lifetimes) in order to stave off a civil war in Iraq. But long-term occupations are not the modern tools of control, puppet governments and economic slavery are, and cost less. We will leave when someone else is in place to do our work for us." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penniless 0 #70 May 10, 2006 QuoteIMO You are the one that mirors the propaganda..... You need to get off your self appointed high horse....... Your left wing demogoging, moveon.org, youngdemocrates.com Bush hating spew is getting old and most of it is a lie, which you seem to be taking to heart... Sorry for my rant, but it is getting very tiring.... Facts remain facts even if you are tired of hearing them. The stated reason for the Iraq invasion turned out to be false. We invaded a sovereign nation under false pretenses. Colin Powell's speech to the UN turned out to be an embarrassment of falsehoods. "Mission Accomplished" was nothing of the sort. Thousands of American boys dead and maimed, and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians too. Costs spiraling out of control. All on account of US hubris. Those are the facts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #71 May 10, 2006 >The stated reason for the Iraq invasion turned out to be false. We invaded a sovereign nation under false pretenses.< These statements are false! Enough said........."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #72 May 10, 2006 QuoteThese statements are false! Enough said......... Exactly, questioning anything the WHite House does is decidedly un-patriotic. As a matter of fact, those voicing their concerns with the current administration should be segregated from society and kept in camps. I mean, really, nobody knows what those unpatriotic "almost terrorists" are capable of doing if not kept in check.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,119 #73 May 10, 2006 >Make up your mind, Bill...it's either a puppet government or >it's not...which is it? Right now it's a barely functioning fledgeling government that's trying to get its act together. If we have to prop it up permanently to allow it to survive (as we are doing now) it will be a puppet government. If it asks us to leave (and we do) and it survives, then it will not be. I hope the latter happens, but so far we have had to do the former. They've had three years; will it take another three years? Ten? Thirty? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #74 May 10, 2006 QuoteQuoteThese statements are false! Enough said......... Exactly, questioning anything the WHite House does is decidedly un-patriotic. As a matter of fact, those voicing their concerns with the current administration should be segregated from society and kept in camps. I mean, really, nobody knows what those unpatriotic "almost terrorists" are capable of doing if not kept in check.... Hm, I am looking to see where I posted any of what you have here and I can not find it. Nice try twist, spin and move. Twist, spin and move......."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #75 May 10, 2006 Quote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Reply To -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These statements are false! Enough said......... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exactly, questioning anything the WHite House does is decidedly un-patriotic. As a matter of fact, those voicing their concerns with the current administration should be segregated from society and kept in camps. I mean, really, nobody knows what those unpatriotic "almost terrorists" are capable of doing if not kept in check.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hm, I am looking to see where I posted any of what you have here and I can not find it. Nice try twist, spin and move. Twist, spin and move....... Hmm, I am looking to see where I wrote: rushmc said... and I cannot find it. Nice try Twist, spin and move. Twist, spin and move. I have been dying to ask though.....how often do you enjoy yourself? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 3 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
