akarunway 1 #1 March 23, 2006 Why can't they just hurry and get to the forced retina scans and chip implants. I just can't waithttp://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/14155275.htm?source=yahoodist&content=ksc_newsI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #2 March 23, 2006 Hell you know its coming.. but it will make illegal immigration very hard once we all have our implants.. and national ID Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flygurl 0 #3 March 23, 2006 Might as well put GPS tracking in my chip... it's already in my car.________________________________________ "One out of every four American's are suffering from some form of mental illness. Think of your three best friends. If they're okay, then it's you." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #4 March 23, 2006 Pulled over in Kansas? Get ready to show your license, registration — and fingerprintsBy BENITA Y. WILLIAMSThe Kansas City StarIf you are stopped by police in Kansas, don’t be surprised if the officer pulls out a little black box and takes your fingerprints. The gadget allows officers to identify people by fingerprints without hauling them to the police station. Over the next year the Kansas Bureau of Investigation will test 60 of the devices with law enforcement agencies around the state. State officials said similar tests are being planned for New York, Milwaukee and Hawaii. “This is definitely new,” said Gary Page, Overland Park Police Department crime lab. “It’s been talked about, but as far as I know they are not in use anywhere in the metro.” The tests in Kansas are part of a bigger $3.6 million upgrade to the KBI’s statewide fingerprint database, unveiled Tuesday by the KBI and Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline. ■ The system: Called the Automatic Fingerprint Identification System, it is a statewide database of more than 10 million fingerprints taken from people arrested in Kansas. The Missouri Highway Patrol maintains a similar database. Both systems link to the FBI fingerprint database. ■ How it works: In Kansas, 54 law enforcement agencies have traded the ink-and-paper fingerprinting method for biometric imaging, which electronically scans a digital image of the print. Sixty Missouri agencies use biometric scanning. Police also can scan the fingers of corpses and people they arrest to match them against prints in the system. Results are obtained in seconds instead of hours. The inked cards still used by some smaller departments are also scanned into the statewide systems. ■ Why upgrade? Kansas could no longer locate replacement parts or anyone to service the old system, which was launched in 1990 and upgraded in 1998. The first phase was funded with a $752,000 homeland security grant. The KBI is applying for similar grants to pay the balance. All upgrades should be completed by January 2007. ■ The portable devices: Police place a person’s two index fingers on a screen. Wireless technology sends the image to the database for comparison. Prints scanned in the field will not be stored. ■ What else is new: The system will analyze palm prints, which were stored but could not be read before. The system also will store mug shots and pictures of scars, tattoos and other identifying Quote Sure they won't be stored and the FFL database wasn't stored either Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,150 #5 March 23, 2006 Quote Prints scanned in the field will not be stored. Sure they won't be stored and the FFL database wasn't stored either Damn right.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Nightingale 0 #6 March 23, 2006 I wonder if it could be argued that it would an unreasonable search to fingerprint someone just for a traffic stop. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,150 #7 March 23, 2006 QuoteI wonder if it could be argued that it would an unreasonable search to fingerprint someone just for a traffic stop. It could sure be argued, but Chief Justice Roberts won't buy it. He's big into allowing intrusive government searches (see yesterdays SCOTUS decision).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites unformed 0 #8 March 23, 2006 there was an article in today's usa today, where surprisingly enough, a judge ruled, even if one person in a house consents to a search, if the other doesn't, the police are not allowed to enter... here's the article: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-08-scotus-searches_x.htm this could actually turn out to be positive, especially considering the way things have been going for a while now.This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #9 March 23, 2006 QuoteThe Bush administration has joined the side of Georgia, Gee, what a surprise. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites unformed 0 #10 March 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteThe Bush administration has joined the side of Georgia, Gee, what a surprise. hey man, give 'em a break. people usually stick by those who they know well, and both are at right about the same position in the evolutionary chain ...This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites headoverheels 334 #11 March 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteThe Bush administration has joined the side of Georgia, Gee, what a surprise. Most of us reading 1984, about 35 years ago, thought "scary." GW read it, and thought it made a good plan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kallend 2,150 #5 March 23, 2006 Quote Prints scanned in the field will not be stored. Sure they won't be stored and the FFL database wasn't stored either Damn right.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nightingale 0 #6 March 23, 2006 I wonder if it could be argued that it would an unreasonable search to fingerprint someone just for a traffic stop. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #7 March 23, 2006 QuoteI wonder if it could be argued that it would an unreasonable search to fingerprint someone just for a traffic stop. It could sure be argued, but Chief Justice Roberts won't buy it. He's big into allowing intrusive government searches (see yesterdays SCOTUS decision).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unformed 0 #8 March 23, 2006 there was an article in today's usa today, where surprisingly enough, a judge ruled, even if one person in a house consents to a search, if the other doesn't, the police are not allowed to enter... here's the article: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-08-scotus-searches_x.htm this could actually turn out to be positive, especially considering the way things have been going for a while now.This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #9 March 23, 2006 QuoteThe Bush administration has joined the side of Georgia, Gee, what a surprise. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unformed 0 #10 March 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteThe Bush administration has joined the side of Georgia, Gee, what a surprise. hey man, give 'em a break. people usually stick by those who they know well, and both are at right about the same position in the evolutionary chain ...This ad space for sale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #11 March 23, 2006 QuoteQuoteThe Bush administration has joined the side of Georgia, Gee, what a surprise. Most of us reading 1984, about 35 years ago, thought "scary." GW read it, and thought it made a good plan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
