0
GTAVercetti

You don't own your genes

Recommended Posts

Check out this crazy op ed piece by Michael Crichton:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/opinion/19crichton.html?ex=1300424400&en=9addb806498d2739&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

The gist: Patents are out of control. Companies actually OWN the genes for diseases. Example, a company owns the right to the genes for diabetes. So any research into it must be done with royallties paid to the company.

I have never heard of this. If it is indeed true, I find it unbelievable. How can someone own something so basic to nature?
Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Check out this crazy op ed piece by Michael Crichton:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/opinion/19crichton.html?ex=1300424400&en=9addb806498d2739&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

The gist: Patents are out of control. Companies actually OWN the genes for diseases. Example, a company owns the right to the genes for diabetes. So any research into it must be done with royallties paid to the company.

I have never heard of this. If it is indeed true, I find it unbelievable. How can someone own something so basic to nature?



So? The country is run for the benefit of corporations.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The USPTO has been running amok for years, and the awarding of patents for discovered genetic sequences is one of their more eggregious outrages, compounded by the complete lack of understanding of how most of the sequences actually function or what they even do.

This is not what was anticipated when the President, the Attorney General and the Secretary of State signed the first U.S. patent. It'll all be fixed when we make all three officers personally sign all patents before they can be awarded or enforced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh, and by the way: I own the patent for "essay or letter criticizing a previous publication." So anyone who criticizes what I have said here had better pay a royalty first, or I'll see you in court.



Quote from the article.

It looks like a lot of us here may owe Mr. Crichton some fees for infringing on his patent.
:P:P
"Buttons aren't toys." - Trillian
Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I have never heard of this. If it is indeed true, I find it unbelievable.
>How can someone own something so basic to nature?

The thinking is that allowing such patents will encourage research on them.

During Amy's research year, she was looking into the benefits of hypertonic saline on the treatment of trauma. Turns out that there are some odd links between immune system function and salinity during massive injury; basically the hypertonic saline prevents shock from 'shutting down' the immune system, which can lead to infection, gangrene etc. Worked amazingly well in rats.

No one's ever going to continue the research, though, because no one can patent salt water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think he tried, but the USPTO already gave out a patent on divine suits to someone else.



Actually, apparently divine suits get thrown out because of problems with jurisdiction and service of process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_ex_rel._Gerald_Mayo_v._Satan_and_His_Staff

:D

Brie
"Ive seen you hump air, hump the floor of the plane, and hump legs. You now have a new nickname: "Black Humper of Death"--yardhippie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I think he tried, but the USPTO already gave out a patent on divine suits to someone else.



Actually, apparently divine suits get thrown out because of problems with jurisdiction and service of process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_ex_rel._Gerald_Mayo_v._Satan_and_His_Staff

:D

Brie



Well, actually, that would be a human suit against an immortal being. A divine suit would have God as the plaintiff.

But God refuses to pay the royalty. :ph34r:
Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0