Gravitymaster 0 #26 February 21, 2006 Quote>If you call your brother in Thailand to discuss plans to carry out >a terrorist attack, you can be prosecuted for it. Or mention drugs. There are no rules regarding what you can and can't be prosecuted for. History has shown that law enforcement personnel will use every single tool in their arsenal to prosecute criminals, whether they are criminals in the war on terror or in the war on drugs. Just look at what has been done with the RICO statutes. True. However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. Especially opium from SE Asia and the ME. Regardless of where you fall on drugs and the legality of using drugs, I doubt most would want a large terrorist attack at Disney World funded by their usage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #27 February 21, 2006 >However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. I do not dispute that. My point was only that you can now call your brother on World Team, make a passing mention about smoking pot. and end up in court if they decide to prosecute. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #28 February 21, 2006 Quote>However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. I do not dispute that. My point was only that you can now call your brother on World Team, make a passing mention about smoking pot. and end up in court if they decide to prosecute. I think thats taking it a little to the extreme. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #29 February 21, 2006 >I think thats taking it a little to the extreme. Oh, agreed. Sort of like using RICO, a law intended to stop organized crime, to go after alleged patent fraud by individuals. Could never happen, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brierebecca 0 #30 February 21, 2006 QuoteNope. It's people who MIGHT be terrorists. And there is no oversight on who decides who might be a terrorist. In other words, if you call your brother in Thailand during the record attempt, the call can be tapped and you can be prosecuted for the things that are said during it. Yep. And anyone you mention in the phone call can be prosecuted for anything they say in any of their phone calls. And this from an NSA employee after the hearing with Gonzalez. Brie"Ive seen you hump air, hump the floor of the plane, and hump legs. You now have a new nickname: "Black Humper of Death"--yardhippie Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GTAVercetti 0 #31 February 21, 2006 QuoteQuote>If you call your brother in Thailand to discuss plans to carry out >a terrorist attack, you can be prosecuted for it. Or mention drugs. There are no rules regarding what you can and can't be prosecuted for. History has shown that law enforcement personnel will use every single tool in their arsenal to prosecute criminals, whether they are criminals in the war on terror or in the war on drugs. Just look at what has been done with the RICO statutes. True. However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. Especially opium from SE Asia and the ME. Regardless of where you fall on drugs and the legality of using drugs, I doubt most would want a large terrorist attack at Disney World funded by their usage. Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone.Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brierebecca 0 #32 February 21, 2006 QuoteOh, agreed. Sort of like using RICO, a law intended to stop organized crime, to go after alleged patent fraud by individuals. Could never happen, right? Quote Heh. Or using it to go after abortion protesters. See Schiedler v. National Organization of Women. Thank god the SC stepped in on that one. Brie"Ive seen you hump air, hump the floor of the plane, and hump legs. You now have a new nickname: "Black Humper of Death"--yardhippie Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,118 #33 February 21, 2006 >Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone. Come to think of it, one of the standards of RICO is that you can prosecute an individual if they do a questionable act more than once. So you should be fine as long as you don't regularly buy gas, or invest in companies that support terrorism through oil purchases. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #34 February 21, 2006 Quote>I think thats taking it a little to the extreme. Oh, agreed. Sort of like using RICO, a law intended to stop organized crime, to go after alleged patent fraud by individuals. Could never happen, right? I don't know anything about RICO being used to go after patent fraud, but I can imagine ways that it would pertain. I've also heard stories about how the rights of Americans are being trashed by the Patriot Act, but I've yet to hear a true story of it happening. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #35 February 21, 2006 Quote>Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone. Come to think of it, one of the standards of RICO is that you can prosecute an individual if they do a questionable act more than once. So you should be fine as long as you don't regularly buy gas, or invest in companies that support terrorism through oil purchases. The flaw in your response is buying gas or investing in companies that support terrorism is it isn't illegal. Drugs are. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #36 February 21, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote>If you call your brother in Thailand to discuss plans to carry out >a terrorist attack, you can be prosecuted for it. Or mention drugs. There are no rules regarding what you can and can't be prosecuted for. History has shown that law enforcement personnel will use every single tool in their arsenal to prosecute criminals, whether they are criminals in the war on terror or in the war on drugs. Just look at what has been done with the RICO statutes. True. However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. Especially opium from SE Asia and the ME. Regardless of where you fall on drugs and the legality of using drugs, I doubt most would want a large terrorist attack at Disney World funded by their usage. Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone. A lot of IED's use fertilizer, so don't talk about fertilizer either.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jenfly00 0 #37 February 21, 2006 Quote>oh well, wiretapping by the nsa has been limited to people who are > actively participating in communication with known terrorists . . . Nope. It's people who MIGHT be terrorists. And there is no oversight on who decides who might be a terrorist. In other words, if you call your brother in Thailand during the record attempt, the call can be tapped and you can be prosecuted for the things that are said during it. Prosecuted? How about just ...disappear. Held without charges, without benefit of legal counsel and subject to torture. Couldn't happen, right?----------------------- "O brave new world that has such people in it". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rickjump1 0 #38 February 22, 2006 QuoteI don't think it will fly with congress.. An investigation is already under way.. Bush is a dumb fuck.. That's right Mr. George W Bush.. I think you are a fucking idiot.. I'm ashamed to have you as my president and I did not vote for your dumb ass..The nerve of this guy: he blows off the house and senate members with a veto threat without any discussion. This is gonna be a good lesson for him.Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rickjump1 0 #39 February 22, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote>If you call your brother in Thailand to discuss plans to carry out >a terrorist attack, you can be prosecuted for it. Or mention drugs. There are no rules regarding what you can and can't be prosecuted for. History has shown that law enforcement personnel will use every single tool in their arsenal to prosecute criminals, whether they are criminals in the war on terror or in the war on drugs. Just look at what has been done with the RICO statutes. True. However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. Especially opium from SE Asia and the ME. Regardless of where you fall on drugs and the legality of using drugs, I doubt most would want a large terrorist attack at Disney World funded by their usage. Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone.How about pistachios. Iranian pistachios are great. Does that sound like a coded message?Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #40 February 22, 2006 Quote I've also heard stories about how the rights of Americans are being trashed by the Patriot Act, but I've yet to hear a true story of it happening. Ask and you shalt recieve. I realize its not NewsMax or Fox News or the CCC website... but take it for what you will. documented cases. The Patriot Act: Targeting American Citizens The party line often heard from Neo-Cons in their attempts to defend the Patriot Act either circulate around the contention that the use of the Patriot Act has never been abused or that it isn't being used against American citizens. Here is an archive of articles that disproves both of these fallacies. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2004/091004patriotact.htm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #41 February 22, 2006 QuoteQuote I've also heard stories about how the rights of Americans are being trashed by the Patriot Act, but I've yet to hear a true story of it happening. Ask and you shalt recieve. I realize its not NewsMax or Fox News or the CCC website... but take it for what you will. documented cases. The Patriot Act: Targeting American Citizens The party line often heard from Neo-Cons in their attempts to defend the Patriot Act either circulate around the contention that the use of the Patriot Act has never been abused or that it isn't being used against American citizens. Here is an archive of articles that disproves both of these fallacies. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2004/091004patriotact.htm Alex Jones...now there's a real credible source. Why am I not surprised you would post a link to such a wacko site. Have you purchased any of his material in which he "proves" the Govt. was behind 9/11? Alex Jones .... Thanks for making me laugh. BTW did you actually read any of the "proof?" Now say something insulting or mean so I can get a woody... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #42 February 22, 2006 Like I said not an approved News outlet for the administration... gets me all hot for the good old days of the Soviet Union and Tass/ Pravda. DUDE Kruschev said we would become them, I guess we are WELL on our way Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #43 February 22, 2006 Quote DUDE Kruschev said we would become them, I guess we are WELL on our way Hey, if he said it, it must be true. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #44 February 22, 2006 Face it You will still be apologizing for these assholes in the Administration no matter WHAT the hell they do to the American People... deficits... economy failing due to that( give it a year or so with these deficits) another war in several more Islamic countries due to WMD..... Let me guess you are secretly a member of the administration...I am guessing Carl Rove.. same kind of outlook on life. So what percieved threat are you going to use to make the american people afraid for the next election...... how many former servicemen are you going to denigrate this time....or are we even going to bother with the elections.. like Tommy Franks is looking for. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #45 February 22, 2006 QuoteFace it You will still be apologizing for these assholes in the Administration no matter WHAT the hell they do to the American People... deficits... economy failing due to that( give it a year or so with these deficits) another war in several more Islamic countries due to WMD..... Let me guess you are secretly a member of the administration...I am guessing Carl Rove.. same kind of outlook on life. So what percieved threat are you going to use to make the american people afraid for the next election...... how many former servicemen are you going to denigrate this time....or are we even going to bother with the elections.. like Tommy Franks is looking for. Damned...my cover is blown. Little reading material I knew would interest you. http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060217/OPINION/602170426/1002 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #46 February 22, 2006 Actually I saw him live the other night.. and I agree with him on SOOO Many issues. I would support a man like that in an instant.. but I guess the power elite types dont like his in your face message and want someone more like them.. Notice the leadership of his party did NOT denigrate his service as Rove et al have done to Mc Cain and to Murtha. There will be a time coming for men like Hackett... Leaders... REAL leaders not the limp dicks in this administration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ryoder 1,590 #47 February 22, 2006 On the positive side, the Nixon administration no longer looks so bad in comparison."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #48 February 22, 2006 You should apply your anger towards the limp dicks in the Democratic Party like Reid, Pelosi and Schumer instead of worrying about Repubs. As long as these people continue to call the shots, the Dems will continue to lose elections. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #49 February 22, 2006 QuoteYou should apply your anger towards the limp dicks in the Democratic Party like Reid, Pelosi and Schumer Wow you really must be a Beltway insider if you have information like that ....who would have imagined Pelosi had one of those. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,118 #50 February 22, 2006 >As long as these people continue to call the shots, the Dems will continue to lose elections. Problem is that when presented with a choice between a 'limp dick' and a corrupt, pro-torture career bureaucrat, many will choose the less corrupt option. Which is why the GOP is very, very worried about elections over the next few years. They've giving people a choice between corruption and indecisiveness. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
billvon 3,118 #33 February 21, 2006 >Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone. Come to think of it, one of the standards of RICO is that you can prosecute an individual if they do a questionable act more than once. So you should be fine as long as you don't regularly buy gas, or invest in companies that support terrorism through oil purchases. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #34 February 21, 2006 Quote>I think thats taking it a little to the extreme. Oh, agreed. Sort of like using RICO, a law intended to stop organized crime, to go after alleged patent fraud by individuals. Could never happen, right? I don't know anything about RICO being used to go after patent fraud, but I can imagine ways that it would pertain. I've also heard stories about how the rights of Americans are being trashed by the Patriot Act, but I've yet to hear a true story of it happening. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #35 February 21, 2006 Quote>Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone. Come to think of it, one of the standards of RICO is that you can prosecute an individual if they do a questionable act more than once. So you should be fine as long as you don't regularly buy gas, or invest in companies that support terrorism through oil purchases. The flaw in your response is buying gas or investing in companies that support terrorism is it isn't illegal. Drugs are. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #36 February 21, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote>If you call your brother in Thailand to discuss plans to carry out >a terrorist attack, you can be prosecuted for it. Or mention drugs. There are no rules regarding what you can and can't be prosecuted for. History has shown that law enforcement personnel will use every single tool in their arsenal to prosecute criminals, whether they are criminals in the war on terror or in the war on drugs. Just look at what has been done with the RICO statutes. True. However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. Especially opium from SE Asia and the ME. Regardless of where you fall on drugs and the legality of using drugs, I doubt most would want a large terrorist attack at Disney World funded by their usage. Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone. A lot of IED's use fertilizer, so don't talk about fertilizer either.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenfly00 0 #37 February 21, 2006 Quote>oh well, wiretapping by the nsa has been limited to people who are > actively participating in communication with known terrorists . . . Nope. It's people who MIGHT be terrorists. And there is no oversight on who decides who might be a terrorist. In other words, if you call your brother in Thailand during the record attempt, the call can be tapped and you can be prosecuted for the things that are said during it. Prosecuted? How about just ...disappear. Held without charges, without benefit of legal counsel and subject to torture. Couldn't happen, right?----------------------- "O brave new world that has such people in it". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #38 February 22, 2006 QuoteI don't think it will fly with congress.. An investigation is already under way.. Bush is a dumb fuck.. That's right Mr. George W Bush.. I think you are a fucking idiot.. I'm ashamed to have you as my president and I did not vote for your dumb ass..The nerve of this guy: he blows off the house and senate members with a veto threat without any discussion. This is gonna be a good lesson for him.Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #39 February 22, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuote>If you call your brother in Thailand to discuss plans to carry out >a terrorist attack, you can be prosecuted for it. Or mention drugs. There are no rules regarding what you can and can't be prosecuted for. History has shown that law enforcement personnel will use every single tool in their arsenal to prosecute criminals, whether they are criminals in the war on terror or in the war on drugs. Just look at what has been done with the RICO statutes. True. However a great deal of terrorism is funded by illegal drugs. Especially opium from SE Asia and the ME. Regardless of where you fall on drugs and the legality of using drugs, I doubt most would want a large terrorist attack at Disney World funded by their usage. Terrorism is also funded by oil. Don't talk about oil on the phone.How about pistachios. Iranian pistachios are great. Does that sound like a coded message?Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #40 February 22, 2006 Quote I've also heard stories about how the rights of Americans are being trashed by the Patriot Act, but I've yet to hear a true story of it happening. Ask and you shalt recieve. I realize its not NewsMax or Fox News or the CCC website... but take it for what you will. documented cases. The Patriot Act: Targeting American Citizens The party line often heard from Neo-Cons in their attempts to defend the Patriot Act either circulate around the contention that the use of the Patriot Act has never been abused or that it isn't being used against American citizens. Here is an archive of articles that disproves both of these fallacies. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2004/091004patriotact.htm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #41 February 22, 2006 QuoteQuote I've also heard stories about how the rights of Americans are being trashed by the Patriot Act, but I've yet to hear a true story of it happening. Ask and you shalt recieve. I realize its not NewsMax or Fox News or the CCC website... but take it for what you will. documented cases. The Patriot Act: Targeting American Citizens The party line often heard from Neo-Cons in their attempts to defend the Patriot Act either circulate around the contention that the use of the Patriot Act has never been abused or that it isn't being used against American citizens. Here is an archive of articles that disproves both of these fallacies. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2004/091004patriotact.htm Alex Jones...now there's a real credible source. Why am I not surprised you would post a link to such a wacko site. Have you purchased any of his material in which he "proves" the Govt. was behind 9/11? Alex Jones .... Thanks for making me laugh. BTW did you actually read any of the "proof?" Now say something insulting or mean so I can get a woody... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #42 February 22, 2006 Like I said not an approved News outlet for the administration... gets me all hot for the good old days of the Soviet Union and Tass/ Pravda. DUDE Kruschev said we would become them, I guess we are WELL on our way Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #43 February 22, 2006 Quote DUDE Kruschev said we would become them, I guess we are WELL on our way Hey, if he said it, it must be true. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #44 February 22, 2006 Face it You will still be apologizing for these assholes in the Administration no matter WHAT the hell they do to the American People... deficits... economy failing due to that( give it a year or so with these deficits) another war in several more Islamic countries due to WMD..... Let me guess you are secretly a member of the administration...I am guessing Carl Rove.. same kind of outlook on life. So what percieved threat are you going to use to make the american people afraid for the next election...... how many former servicemen are you going to denigrate this time....or are we even going to bother with the elections.. like Tommy Franks is looking for. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #45 February 22, 2006 QuoteFace it You will still be apologizing for these assholes in the Administration no matter WHAT the hell they do to the American People... deficits... economy failing due to that( give it a year or so with these deficits) another war in several more Islamic countries due to WMD..... Let me guess you are secretly a member of the administration...I am guessing Carl Rove.. same kind of outlook on life. So what percieved threat are you going to use to make the american people afraid for the next election...... how many former servicemen are you going to denigrate this time....or are we even going to bother with the elections.. like Tommy Franks is looking for. Damned...my cover is blown. Little reading material I knew would interest you. http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060217/OPINION/602170426/1002 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #46 February 22, 2006 Actually I saw him live the other night.. and I agree with him on SOOO Many issues. I would support a man like that in an instant.. but I guess the power elite types dont like his in your face message and want someone more like them.. Notice the leadership of his party did NOT denigrate his service as Rove et al have done to Mc Cain and to Murtha. There will be a time coming for men like Hackett... Leaders... REAL leaders not the limp dicks in this administration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ryoder 1,590 #47 February 22, 2006 On the positive side, the Nixon administration no longer looks so bad in comparison."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #48 February 22, 2006 You should apply your anger towards the limp dicks in the Democratic Party like Reid, Pelosi and Schumer instead of worrying about Repubs. As long as these people continue to call the shots, the Dems will continue to lose elections. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #49 February 22, 2006 QuoteYou should apply your anger towards the limp dicks in the Democratic Party like Reid, Pelosi and Schumer Wow you really must be a Beltway insider if you have information like that ....who would have imagined Pelosi had one of those. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,118 #50 February 22, 2006 >As long as these people continue to call the shots, the Dems will continue to lose elections. Problem is that when presented with a choice between a 'limp dick' and a corrupt, pro-torture career bureaucrat, many will choose the less corrupt option. Which is why the GOP is very, very worried about elections over the next few years. They've giving people a choice between corruption and indecisiveness. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Amazon 7 #42 February 22, 2006 Like I said not an approved News outlet for the administration... gets me all hot for the good old days of the Soviet Union and Tass/ Pravda. DUDE Kruschev said we would become them, I guess we are WELL on our way Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #43 February 22, 2006 Quote DUDE Kruschev said we would become them, I guess we are WELL on our way Hey, if he said it, it must be true. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #44 February 22, 2006 Face it You will still be apologizing for these assholes in the Administration no matter WHAT the hell they do to the American People... deficits... economy failing due to that( give it a year or so with these deficits) another war in several more Islamic countries due to WMD..... Let me guess you are secretly a member of the administration...I am guessing Carl Rove.. same kind of outlook on life. So what percieved threat are you going to use to make the american people afraid for the next election...... how many former servicemen are you going to denigrate this time....or are we even going to bother with the elections.. like Tommy Franks is looking for. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #45 February 22, 2006 QuoteFace it You will still be apologizing for these assholes in the Administration no matter WHAT the hell they do to the American People... deficits... economy failing due to that( give it a year or so with these deficits) another war in several more Islamic countries due to WMD..... Let me guess you are secretly a member of the administration...I am guessing Carl Rove.. same kind of outlook on life. So what percieved threat are you going to use to make the american people afraid for the next election...... how many former servicemen are you going to denigrate this time....or are we even going to bother with the elections.. like Tommy Franks is looking for. Damned...my cover is blown. Little reading material I knew would interest you. http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060217/OPINION/602170426/1002 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #46 February 22, 2006 Actually I saw him live the other night.. and I agree with him on SOOO Many issues. I would support a man like that in an instant.. but I guess the power elite types dont like his in your face message and want someone more like them.. Notice the leadership of his party did NOT denigrate his service as Rove et al have done to Mc Cain and to Murtha. There will be a time coming for men like Hackett... Leaders... REAL leaders not the limp dicks in this administration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #47 February 22, 2006 On the positive side, the Nixon administration no longer looks so bad in comparison."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #48 February 22, 2006 You should apply your anger towards the limp dicks in the Democratic Party like Reid, Pelosi and Schumer instead of worrying about Repubs. As long as these people continue to call the shots, the Dems will continue to lose elections. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #49 February 22, 2006 QuoteYou should apply your anger towards the limp dicks in the Democratic Party like Reid, Pelosi and Schumer Wow you really must be a Beltway insider if you have information like that ....who would have imagined Pelosi had one of those. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #50 February 22, 2006 >As long as these people continue to call the shots, the Dems will continue to lose elections. Problem is that when presented with a choice between a 'limp dick' and a corrupt, pro-torture career bureaucrat, many will choose the less corrupt option. Which is why the GOP is very, very worried about elections over the next few years. They've giving people a choice between corruption and indecisiveness. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
