0
Gravitymaster

NAACP Compares GOP to Nazis

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

take away old peoples houses



OTOH the Liberals on the SCOTUS have passed a law which does this exactly.



By "passed a law", you mean "interpreted a law to mean what it says", don't you?



Actually, you are partially correct. Their warped sense of the law led them to misinterpet a law which has had a more negative effect on people's constitutional rights than any post 9/11 actions including the Patriot Act.



The issue is whether the negative effect on property rights (which is undeniable) is a consequence of the wording of the law, or the way the Supremes "mis"interpreted it.

To get back on topic, NAACP has lost its way and Bond is an idiot. However, I find the right wing of the GOP to be much scarier than Bond.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The GOP uses hatred and fear far more effectively, don't you think?



Probably. At least the "fear" part. The right is more effective with fear because we have the commnder in chief. To deny the efficcy of that would ludicrous.

On the other hand, right-wingers aren't allowed to hate. Racism is bad only if propogated by whites. Racism is good if propogated against whites. White Democrats and Republicans alike have spewed hatred towards other racial groups. But, the left has a monopoly on anti-white racism (and anti-asian) racism. That kind is politically acceptable.

There are other politically acceptable hatreds. Homphobia? Unacceptable. Hatred of homophobes? Acceptable.

Hatred of whitey? Acceptable. Hatred by whitey? Unacceptable.

Hatred of Christians? Acceptable, if not outright encouraged. Hatred of Jews? acceptable, so long as not by Christians.

Hatred by Christians? Not acceptable. Love by Christians? Not acceptable (for it must be based on hate). Love of Christians? Fuck no.

Hatred of Catholics? Acceptable (their priests are all pederasts, right?) Hatred of Muslims? HELL, NO! They might attack us again, which they did because we hate them.

Hatred of corporations? Oh, yes! You're turning me on! Hatred of the welfare queen? No way, unless she's white trailer trash, which is acceptable.

The left can hate away all it wants. Anyone who speaks out against that the left's vitriol is a "token," "Oreo," "Uncle Tom," "in the pockets of big oil money and corporations," or is a bigot, racist, sexist, homophobe.

Sure, the right-wing has haters, too. Robertson and Falwell are among them. They have no touch with the mainstream, though. The problem is that the haters on the left HAVE touch with the mainstream. They HAVE that kind of say. And the NAACP is at the forefront of the mainstream civil rights movment. It now sounds more like the Nation of Islam.

Of course, I'll be branded as a racist or a redneck for calling it what it is - HATRED. Sure, they have the right to hate, and I have the right to not support it.

The NAACP is headed by haters and bigots.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well said! Hurumph Hurumph!

Instead of lies and the lying liars who tell them, it should be hate and the hating haters that spew it. :D
People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Spew hate and divide people has pretty much become SOP for the Libs.



yeah, thank God we have Bush - the great uniter - hahaha

Cheers, T

(edited for grammar upon request)
*******************************************************************
Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> Hell the American Nazi Party lost a LOT of thier support from members in the last election. They voted GOP instead.. just like alot of the other extremist groups.

Like it or not they are there...with the Cultish REligeios Right

I wish I could quit you, but I can't, you just to damn funny to read. Although reading your post pains my neck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

> Hell the American Nazi Party lost a LOT of thier support from members in the last election. They voted GOP instead.. just like alot of the other extremist groups.

Like it or not they are there...with the Cultish REligeios Right



The Army of Ansar al-Sunnah, who liked to kidnap and behead people, endorsed John Kerry. So did Nobel Peace Prize winning terrorist Yassir Arafat. Hell, Jim Jones (of Jonestown fame) was a favorite of Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter and a leader of the NorCal Democrats (he brought out Democratic voters in droves - only later did he have them killed).

Yawn. Just because a nutcase or wacko votes or somebody does not mean that the person being voted for is a nutcase or a wacko, or even espouses all of the same views. As South Park put it, how do you choose between a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich?


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Spew hate and divide people has pretty much become SOP for the Libs.



yeah, thank God we Bush - the great uniter - hahaha

Cheers, T



Thank God you Bush?? Ehrrrrrr......O.K........If you say so. :P

Please explain what the Libs have done to try and bring the country together. Most no longer have any helpful suggestion to solve problems. All they do is oppose everything and tell us why it won't work. Oh, except for the "secret plan to (fill in blank)"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Mr Bush.. does not like to hear anything that does not jibe with his world view.



If their "world view" is that Republicans are like Nazis, then their opinions aren't worth hearing, and there is no intellectual loss from that absence.

Using your same idea, I suppose then that you would prefer that President Bush meet with neo-Nazis and the KKK, and would praise him for doing so, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I really like the part about "J. Edgar Ashcroft". But I'm so tired of comparisons to Nazi Germany, whether it comes from anti-abortionists or the NAACP.

The plain truth is that if we had lost World War II, we not only would have plenty of swatstikas on the flag, we would have no black people. They'd have all gone up a chimney somewhere in Nevada or Montana. Seriously, think about it. If the Nazis had already done it to the Jews, they'd have about finished the Holocaust if they'd won the war. And they'd have moved on to other "inferior" races in conquered lands like the Americas. In North America there would be NO racial minorities anymore. South America and Africa would be massive slave labor continents on a scale we can't even imagine.

No kiddin' people, we literally saved the world with that war. From great evil. People who compare anybody with the Nazis may mean well, but they just don't understand that there is no comparison with what they did and would've done.

And what they don't teach you in school is just how close the Nazis came to winning that war - it almost happened.

Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I really like the part about "J. Edgar Ashcroft". But I'm so tired of comparisons to Nazi Germany, whether it comes from anti-abortionists or the NAACP.

The plain truth is that if we had lost World War II, we not only would have plenty of swatstikas on the flag, we would have no black people. They'd have all gone up a chimney somewhere in Nevada or Montana. Seriously, think about it. If the Nazis had already done it to the Jews, they'd have about finished the Holocaust if they'd won the war. And they'd have moved on to other "inferior" races in conquered lands like the Americas. In North America there would be NO racial minorities anymore. South America and Africa would be massive slave labor continents on a scale we can't even imagine.

No kiddin' people, we literally saved the world with that war. From great evil. People who compare anybody with the Nazis may mean well, but they just don't understand that there is no comparison with what they did and would've done.

And what they don't teach you in school is just how close the Nazis came to winning that war - it almost happened.



That's true. If the Battle of Britain had gone the other way it would have been all over in 1940.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Taking an adversarial position is a business.

When things are great, it puts them out of a job.
"Hey, things look great. They are treating you perfectly. You don't need us."

Unions will never say that a business treats the employees fairly.

Religious groups are famous for this. "The US of A is being destroyed by immorality. God will punish this country if you don't start sending me money."

There are also gender and race-centric groups that are never going to be satisfied by any change or result. More women are being admitted to college than men now. Does that stop the preferential admissions policies? Is the NOW saying, "We did a fine job with that. We don't need preferences there now, thanks." ?

These are all parasitic groups that make their living on divisiveness and exploiting the ignorance, anger, prejudices, and greed of their constituencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Black Conservatives Slam Extremist Comments from NAACP Chairman Julian Bond

Chairman Bond's Comments Demean the Reputation of the Venerable Civil Rights Group



For Release: February 3, 2006
Contact: David Almasi at 202/543-4110 x11
or Project21@nationalcenter.org


Members of the black leadership network Project 21 are appalled by comments NAACP chairman Julian Bond reportedly made during a recent speech in North Carolina. Members say the radical nature of Bond's comments are detrimental to the civil rights group's reputation and its ability to function within the non-partisan confines of its non-profit status.

As reported by WorldNetDaily, Bond's comments came during a February 1 speech at Fayetteville State University in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Bond is said to have called Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and predecessor Colin Powell "tokens." He also compared the Bush Administration's judicial nominees to the former Taliban regime in Afghanistan and said "The Republican Party would have the American flag and the [Nazi] swastika flying side by side."

"If Julian Bond's comments are indicative of the NAACP, the group has truly lost its way. I believe the NAACP has positioned itself on the far left of the political spectrum, and Mr. Bond's comments give me no reason to think otherwise," said Project 21 member Jimmie Hollis.

"What is most offensive to me is that Julian Bond denigrated Secretary Rice and Colin Powell as tokens at the beginning of Black History Month. President Bush's appointments are not based on skin color, but the content of peoples' character. This was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream. The fact that Rice and Powell became the face of U.S. foreign policy during President Bush's first term, as well as Rod Paige at the Department of Education and Alphonso Jackson at Housing and Urban Development, says a lot," said Project 21 member Geoffrey Moore. "And yet NAACP leaders still seem to wonder why President Bush refuses to address their annual conference."

"Julian Bond's tirades serve only to further reduce the once-great standing of the NAACP in our society," added Project 21 member Mychal Massie. "Bond's rank partisanship must call into question the legitimacy of the NAACP's political neutrality and its charitable tax status."

In October of 2005, the IRS reportedly informed NAACP leaders that anti-Bush comments made by Bond at the group's 2005 annual conference may have constituted political activity that violates the group's non-profit status.

Bond's February 1 speech was part of the Fayetteville State University's Distinguished Speaker Series. Announcements and media coverage of the speech described Bond as the chairman of the NAACP and did not indicate he was speaking as a private citizen.

"As Julian Bond wallows in the sunset of 1960s victimization, other blacks are moving onward and upward," said Project 21 member Deneen Moore. "People of all colors and creeds should stand up to those who continue to incite negative racial bigotry and name-calling as a vehicle to air their agenda."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further evidence that the NAACP and Bond in particular are way out of the mainstream thinking of many blacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"What is most offensive to me is that Julian Bond denigrated Secretary Rice and Colin Powell as tokens at the beginning of Black History Month. President Bush's appointments are not based on skin color, but the content of peoples' character. This was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream. The fact that Rice and Powell became the face of U.S. foreign policy during President Bush's first term, as well as Rod Paige at the Department of Education and Alphonso Jackson at Housing and Urban Development, says a lot," said Project 21 member Geoffrey Moore. "And yet NAACP leaders still seem to wonder why President Bush refuses to address their annual conference."

Further evidence that the NAACP and Bond in particular are way out of the mainstream thinking of many blacks.



Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy Jr. founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in part because they felt the NAACP was out of step with the times - and that was in the 1950's.

As anyone who reads these forums know, I'm a rabid Bush hater. But truthfully, I don't think the guy has a racist bone in his body. In fact, about the only good or smart thing I can think of him ever doing is the way the Texas Republican Party has reached out to Hispanic voters - with resounding success (compare this to California's Republican Party, which is the standard bearer of white racial purity and pays for it in every state election).

That doesn't mean that his shills and minions don't resort to racial hijinks - especially the harassment of black voters in heavily black precincts in states like Florida.

But a racist ? Bush ? no, I don't think so. I despise the guy enough that I wish I could say he was. But he's not.

Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Members say the radical nature of Bond's comments are detrimental to the civil rights group's reputation and its ability to function within the non-partisan confines of its non-profit status.



Now, wouldn't that be something - if the NAACP lost its non-profit status due to partisanship? It may be what Julian Bon dis trying to do, because of the political hay that he can make out of it.

Let's say that the NAACP loses its tax-exempt status. Now there's something to shout out - "Bush Administration strips NAACP of tax-exempt status. Nation outraged at Administrations destruction of dissentingvoices."

I seriously wouldn't put it past them to deliberately do something that causes them to lose tax-exempt status so that they can have ammunition against Bush and lots of, "See? I told you so. The American Taliban."


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0