0
TheAnvil

What a horrid day for 700 FL kids

Recommended Posts

Clicky

That turd Meyer's quote really perturbed me. "Students using vouchers will now be welcomed back into Florida public schools," Meyer said in a statement.

Welcomed? Neither they nor their parents want to return, Meyer, you fucking NEA tool. They left for a reason. If Mr. Meyer actually cared about the kids, he would want them in the best educational environs possible. Private school vs. failing public school - pretty much a no brainer. I'm sure the parents of those kids REALLY appreciate what Mr. Meyer has done for them on behalf of the NEA, NAACP, and LWV.
:S>:(
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A side note... Public vs. private is not that straight forward. Blaming your level of basic education on public school system is, well not valid. It's like saying "I had bad beef at one restaurant - thus all beef is bad and from now on I'm going to eat just chicken..." :P

Take a look at PISA http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pages/0,2987,en_32252351_32235731_1_1_1_1_1,00.html

Guess how many of those top rated countries had a mostly private school system...

It's not the question of private vs. public - I'm confident you can make both work, or fail.

Finland has a public school system. According to PISA it was rated on the top on two consecutive assessments. Also, the Finnish system was one of the most equal ones - no matter what part of Finland pupils came from or what school they went to, they were receiving similar scores in the assessment. So where you lived or came from did not have significant impact on how you were doing in the assessment. Would you agree this would not necessary be the case if we had a private school network instead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not a Florida taxpayer, but if I were, I'd have issue with my tax dollars paying for your kids to attend private school. I've never had any kids and never will. I don't like paying for anyone's kids to go to any school.

I'm assuming that the voucher program ends up costing the taxpayer more. Is that the case? If it ends up saving the taxpayers money, then the decision really is heinous.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm not a Florida taxpayer, but if I were, I'd have issue with my tax dollars paying for your kids to attend private school. I've never had any kids and never will. I don't like paying for anyone's kids to go to any school.



Isn't that kind of self-centered, Walt?

Someone paid for you to go to school. We pay for the education of all children--our own and others--because they are the future. I only had one child. I don't resent helping pay for those who have two or more.

That said, I'm not sure I agree with the voucher system. It seems to me that the money is better spent improving the system we have.

rl
If you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Isn't that kind of self-centered, Walt?


Yes it is.

Quote

Someone paid for you to go to school.


My parents paid taxes.

Quote


We pay for the education of all children--our own and others--because they are the future. I only had one child. I don't resent helping pay for those who have two or more.



Fine for you, but those of us who have chosen to never have kids are paying for those who do and many of those people are having kids when they cannot afford them in the first place. Those people are putting an unfair burden on the rest of society.

Is it not just as unfair for people without kids to support other people's kids even if they do otherwise not depend on the rest of society to support their kids?

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Fine for you, but those of us who have chosen to never have kids are paying for those who do and many of those people are having kids when they cannot afford them in the first place. Those people are putting an unfair burden on the rest of society.



Agreed but be careful. Some people believe you should pay for everything they do. It is not politically correct to suggest otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Fine for you, but those of us who have chosen to never have kids are paying for those who do and many of those people are having kids when they cannot afford them in the first place. Those people are putting an unfair burden on the rest of society.



Agreed but be careful. Some people believe you should pay for everything they do. It is not politically correct to suggest otherwise.



Point well taken. RL is in no way, shape or form, one of those people, but they do exist and they are a burden.

In some cases, it's a burden I don't mind. In many cases, though, it's a matter of people being grossly irresponsible and expecting others to pay for the mess they create.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Isn't that kind of self-centered, Walt?


Yes it is.



Someone paid for you to go to school.


My parents paid taxes.



Generally speaking, the taxes paid by a single family are not enough to educate their children even if they have only one child.

Your education was subsidized by the taxes of others, some of whom had no children. It is part of being a member of society to see to our collective future.

Quote

Quote


We pay for the education of all children--our own and others--because they are the future. I only had one child. I don't resent helping pay for those who have two or more.



Fine for you, but those of us who have chosen to never have kids are paying for those who do and many of those people are having kids when they cannot afford them in the first place. Those people are putting an unfair burden on the rest of society.



You're paying back into what you had the advantage of. Childless people helped pay for you. Now that my daughter is grown, I'm paying to help educate the children of others, some of whom have large families.

Quote

Is it not just as unfair for people without kids to support other people's kids even if they do otherwise not depend on the rest of society to support their kids?



I can't wrap my mind around that sentence this morning. It must be PMS.

rl
If you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm not a Florida taxpayer, but if I were, I'd have issue with my tax dollars paying for your kids to attend private school. I've never had any kids and never will. I don't like paying for anyone's kids to go to any school.

I'm assuming that the voucher program ends up costing the taxpayer more. Is that the case? If it ends up saving the taxpayers money, then the decision really is heinous.

Walt



While I am not a big fan of the voucher program, your argument is a somewhat extreme. Do you really think that BASIC education should be totally private? I mean, I am pretty liberal when it comes to government interference in our lives, but without taxpayer money for school, I can bet we would see alot less people going to any school. And you would see our country getting even dumber.
Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm trying to figure out if this thread is drifting in the "I hate welfare mothers" direction.:P

I think spending money on welfare and education is a better use of tax dollars than the $2 million per cruise missle or buying 370 F22 Raptor's thru FY 2009 at a cost of $170 million per plane.
"Buttons aren't toys." - Trillian
Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
saying it isn't fair for a single person to have to pay taxes is kind of like saying it isn't fair for an employed person to be paying for unemployment or welfare...

if i calculate the amount of property taxes based on a 100,000 dollar home in the school district I live and assume that the rate never rises (LOL). In say 40 years, again assuming i'm in that city and I have been a homeowner for those 40 years I will have paid over 70,000 in taxes specifically to the school district, (you can look up your county school districts tax rates online or just call your county tax contact and find out what your rate it. Because we pay a percentage of your property tax for school district funding, (atleast in most places), the "richer" or people living in more expensive homes pay quite a bit more... if you triple the home value to 300,000 your now paying over 220,000 over that same period...

i'm not saying how we pay for our childrens education is right or wrong, but "it is what it is"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You're paying back into what you had the advantage of. Childless people helped pay for you. Now that my daughter is grown, I'm paying to help educate the children of others, some of whom have large families.



That sounds like a sugar-coated version of "we've always done it this way". Yes, we have always (or at least for a very long time) done it this way, but that does not automatically make it reasonable.

I think it's not reasonable. You think it is. We can simply agree that we don't agree on that point and probably never will.

I do not have the perspective of being a parent and I'm sure that I might feel differently if I did. As a non-parent, though, paying school taxes is a bit annoying. It's obviously not that big of a deal--I don't lay awake at night thinking about it.

Quote

Is it not just as unfair for people without kids to support other people's kids even if they do otherwise not depend on the rest of society to support their kids?



I can't wrap my mind around that sentence this morning. It must be PMS.

rl



Sorry to hear about your PMS, but re-reading the sentence, it isn't clear to me either.

What I meant to do was to compare two cases and get your thoughts.

Consider the case where someone who has kids they can't afford and expects society to pay for their irresponsibility. In that case, paying school taxes to support their kids' education is put in the larger context of a parasitic lifestyle.

I think anyone could see the first case as being unfair to society at large because of the larger context.

In the second case, one where the parents can afford their kids and pay taxes and don't rely on the government to support their lifestyle, then the context is quite different, but I still think that non-parents paying their kids' schooling expenses is still unfair.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Consider the case where someone who has kids they can't afford and expects society to pay for their irresponsibility. In that case, paying school taxes to support their kids' education is put in the larger context of a parasitic lifestyle.



The problem with this idea is that if we remove the tax that is used to fund public school, it will not stop idiots from having children. Instead, they will keep going and their children will have NO chance to improve their lives and will then become idiots themselves. And the saga continues.

Furthermore, if there was no public school, I am not even sure MY parents could have afforded to send me to school. My parents are not rich. They handle money well but I don't think they could have afforded to pay for 17 years of school (I included college too). Particularly at the age when people usually have children.

I too, do not plan on having children. But I like innovation, art, creativity, new ideas. If our children do not receive a basic education, the alot of what I like will lessen. Basic education may not give them everything, but it gives many drive to be better. I know it did for me.
Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm trying to figure out if this thread is drifting in the "I hate welfare mothers" direction.:P

I think spending money on welfare and education is a better use of tax dollars than the $2 million per cruise missle or buying 370 F22 Raptor's thru FY 2009 at a cost of $170 million per plane.



I'm not going to start wailing on welfare mothers because each case is different. I will, however, gladly wail on people who take advantage of that system simply because they can, or people who live ridiculous lifestyles knowing that they have welfare to fall back on.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly, I think fewer people *should* go to school.

We have a system where people who have absolutely no desire to be in school are somewhat forced to be there and many of them disrupt the educations of those who *do* want to be there.

I did not want to go to high school. I resented being forced to go. I considered it to be a hell hole; a cesspool of insanity and cruelty. I still feel I would have been better off staying away and getting a GED.

Whether it makes for a "smarter" country or not, I don't think paying for a system like that is necessarily good.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I too, do not plan on having children. But I like innovation, art, creativity, new ideas. If our children do not receive a basic education, the alot of what I like will lessen. Basic education may not give them everything, but it gives many drive to be better. I know it did for me.



It's not clear to me that I got much of *any* kind of education between grades 5 and 12, and I would bet that home schooling can do a far better job of teaching the material taught in grades 1 - 4.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I too, do not plan on having children. But I like innovation, art, creativity, new ideas. If our children do not receive a basic education, the alot of what I like will lessen. Basic education may not give them everything, but it gives many drive to be better. I know it did for me.



It's not clear to me that I got much of *any* kind of education between grades 5 and 12, and I would bet that home schooling can do a far better job of teaching the material taught in grades 1 - 4.

Walt



And that is your personal experience. I had mine and I also know that I would have not gotten into college without public school. And I would not have the good job I possess now.

And do you think every parent has the time to homeschool? It is just not a realistic expectation. Not only must the parent learn to be a good teacher but many parent work full time.

Yes, the argument could be made, "then they should not have kids." But then who would have the kids? Only the rich, who can afford maids or nannies or not working?

That idea simply will not stop people from having kids. And like I said, they will have kids who have no chance to ever further themselves because their parents made poor mistakes. And most likely, they will go onto to make the same mistakes if they make it out alive.

Public school has ALOT of problems, but it is something we need to at least give kids a chance no matter if their parents are morons or not.

(I also agree though that people should not be FORCED to go to school. But then, GED IS an option)
Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That said, I'm not sure I agree with the voucher system. It seems to me that the money is better spent improving the system we have.



Rhonda - this seems to be the classic response to anything that is failing or screwed up. "We need more money." "Obviously, if we had more money, we would be better at this." So they get more money and things don't improve. "We didn't have enough money." Ad nauseum.

There are four ways to spend money, Rhonda:

1) Spend your money on yourself - this way, you want the best product for the best price.
2) Spend your money on somebody else - It's your money so you'll be cheap and not care if they need it or whether the product is any good. This is why I get underwear for Christmas. I don't even wear it,
3) Spend somebody else's money on yourself - you'll want to have the best you can get for that money you have. It's like a gift certificate - it let's you decide what's the best thing for you.
4) Spend somebody else's money on somebody else - screw the cost, screw the product, don't worry whether it's any good, don't bitch about something that's free (even if you are paying for it in taxes). Expensive? No worries, it's not your money. Is it good? Who cares? I don't need it.

Public schooling is Number 4. What's wrong with making it No. 3? Put a little choice in there for the parents and the schools as opposed to just forcing someone into something geographically?

"Ooh. But this school might close because nobody wants to go there." Exactly. If a school sucks, is it good policy to force kids to go there?


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm not going to start wailing on welfare mothers because each case is different. I will, however, gladly wail on people who take advantage of that system simply because they can, or people who live ridiculous lifestyles knowing that they have welfare to fall back on.



I think that your notion of what people on welfare are like is very skewed. When you say ridiculous lifestyle do you mean working a full-time minimum wage job, trying to feed a small child as a single parent, pay for that child's daycare needs and pay bills? I think that that is a more accurate description of someone on welfare than "people who live ridiculous lifestyles".

Check out the minimum wage in your state, it's about $7.50 here. Which means a 40 hour work week leaves you with about $300 before taxes.. that is less than $15,000 per year. Try working out a budget for that which includes paying for rent, electricity, garbage, water, food, child-care costs, gas, car insurance, car payments and trying to save for retirement or the child's education. Maybe that will help your perspective a bit.


-karen

"Life is a temporary victory over the causes which induce death." - Sylvester Graham

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I too, do not plan on having children. But I like innovation, art, creativity, new ideas. If our children do not receive a basic education, the alot of what I like will lessen. Basic education may not give them everything, but it gives many drive to be better. I know it did for me.



It's not clear to me that I got much of *any* kind of education between grades 5 and 12, and I would bet that home schooling can do a far better job of teaching the material taught in grades 1 - 4.

Walt



... During the grades 1-4 pupils learn to be part of a group, interact and work together. Establishing this in home schooling is somewhat more difficult. Not impossible, just a bit more difficult (of course this depends on the size of your family).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think that your notion of what people on welfare are like is very skewed. When you say ridiculous lifestyle do you mean working a full-time minimum wage job, trying to feed a small child as a single parent, pay for that child's daycare needs and pay bills? I think that that is a more accurate description of someone on welfare than "people who live ridiculous lifestyles".



I'm sure my view *is* very skewed, so let me tell you what my view is.

For starters, as I said in a previous post, I think each case is quite different. I have no problems whatsoever with society helping the less fortunate--especially people who have been dealt severe blows from changes in the economy and need a hand getting back on their feet.

I'm well aware of the "working poor". I've been there and it was rough even without having kids. Again, I have no problem with helping anyone who is trying to get out of that hole.

Where I start having a problem, though, is with the idea of multi-generations of a family on welfare. It exists and it points to serious problems in the system.

I also have a problem with someone who lives in government-owned or subsidized housing who profits from criminal activities *or* lets someone who does live with them. That, in my opinion, is a ridiculous lifestyle and it does exist.

Quote


Check out the minimum wage in your state, it's about $7.50 here. Which means a 40 hour work week leaves you with about $300 before taxes.. that is less than $15,000 per year. Try working out a budget for that which includes paying for rent, electricity, garbage, water, food, child-care costs, gas, car insurance, car payments and trying to save for retirement or the child's education. Maybe that will help your perspective a bit.

-karen



What I wonder is why someone in that position *before* they have kids decides to have a kid. Or worse, why would anyone in that position have *more* kids?

Should I pay for that kind of irresponsibility. I be more ok with it if their kids were taken away from them and put in an environment where they did not have that kind of socially-retard role model. Further, I think the parent should be billed for the care of their kids.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

That said, I'm not sure I agree with the voucher system. It seems to me that the money is better spent improving the system we have.



Rhonda - this seems to be the classic response to anything that is failing or screwed up. "We need more money." "Obviously, if we had more money, we would be better at this." So they get more money and things don't improve. "We didn't have enough money." Ad nauseum.



What we're doing now is not giving more money to the school system. We're taking it away.

I don't see how that's going to improve anything.

rl
If you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Actually you are right. I wasn't thinking about it like that. Everyone should get vouchers that can be used for public or private schools.



Definition of the voucher program. A choice on where you send you kid to school. I don't see what's so objectionable about that. Except for the public school who had the monopoly. If this was the telephone company or Enron, or Halliburton, imagine the outrage over the monopoly and how bad that is for society.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0